similar to: [LLVMdev] Hazard recognizers & basic blocks

Ooops, you are right. Just forgot to CC the mailing list. Thanks for noticing it,, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison ________________________________________ From: Damien Vincent [damien.llvm at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 3:57 AM To: Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hazard recognizers & basic blocks Merci ! I was also planning to add a second pass to verify these

Hi, Are there any plans (ongoing works) to implement hazards recognizers for in-order x86 processors (e.g. Atom)? Regards, Sergey Yakoushkin

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -

Hi, Ady wrote: > so, why the original isohybrid image from Debian and many other > isohybrid images have mostly (but not all) "00s" in place of the "90s"? That's a fake Block0 of an Apple Partition Map. Part of mjg's layout. Caused by isohybrid option --mac or xorrisofs option -isohybrid-apm-hfsplus. * Fedora has it with EFI FAT filesystem in one partition

Hi, I would like to compare the hazard functions of two samples using the Cox proportional hazards model. For sample 1 I have individual time-to- event data. For sample 2 I don't have individual data, but grouped data that allows to obtain a hazard function. I am wondering if there is an R function that allows to obtain a hazard ratio of the two hazard funtions (under the

Greetings -- I would like to estimate a proportional hazard model with a weibull or lognormal baseline. I have looked at both the coxph() and survreg() functions and neither appear (to me ) to do it. Am I missing something in the docs or is there another terrific package out there that will do this. Many Thanks. Carl Mason

Hi, Gene Cumm wrote: > it seems the stack format got > set, changed, then mostly reverted back, with this code being the last > piece missing from 2009. The commit to isohdpfx.S of 2009-05-31 looks incomplete. The sequence of the stack pointers was swapped, but the sequence of stack pushes was not.

I have 6 boxes with a client config (see below) across 6 boxes. I am using distribute across 3 replicate pairs. Since I am running xen I need to disable-direct-io and that slows things down quite a bit. My thought was to move the replicate / distribute to the backend server config so that self heal can happen on faster backend rather then frontend client with disable-direct-io. Does this

hi, LLVM, I found there is a flag DisableHazardRecognizer in TargetInstrImpl.cpp. I still don't understand how llvm detects data hazard in pre-RA-sched. pre-RA-sched is based on SDNode and all operands are vregs. Even you can calculate the operators of SDNodes, the data hazard in vreg are not same as physical register data hazard. Is it useful to optimize processor pipeline? thanks, --lx

Hi. I have a list where each object in the list has multiple parts. I'd like to take the mean of just one part of each object. Is it possible to do this with lapply? If not, can you recommend another function? Thanks. eric > x1 <- c(0,1,2,3) > x2 <- c(7,8) > x3 <- c(2,6,6,8) > x4 <- c(4,8) > > Lst1 <- list(label1 = x1,label2 = x2) > Lst2 <-

On Sep 21, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Liu Xin <navy.xliu at gmail.com> wrote: > hi, LLVM, > > I found there is a flag DisableHazardRecognizer in TargetInstrImpl.cpp. I still don't understand how llvm detects data hazard in pre-RA-sched. pre-RA-sched is based on SDNode and all operands are vregs. Even you can calculate the operators of SDNodes, the data hazard in vreg are not same as

Hi, I'm an Apache James committer and we are curious to use imaptest in order to validate our IMAP protocol implementation. I'm using the nightlybuild : imaptest-20170506 I follow the examples given in the /T/ /est IMAP server compliancy/ examples https://imapwiki.org/ImapTest/Examples. And I wanted to analyse the errors reported, here are some: Error: user1 at james.org[11]: seq too

HI Elisa, You could use ?cut() vec1<-c(33,18,13,47,30,10,6,21,39,25,40,29,14,16,44,1,41,4,15,20,46,32,38,5,31,12,48,27,36,24,34,2,35,11,42,9,8,7,26,22,43,17,19,28,23,3,49,37,50,45) label1<-unlist(lapply(mapply(c,lapply(seq(0,45,5),function(x) x),lapply(seq(5,50,5),function(x) x),SIMPLIFY=FALSE),function(i) paste(i[1],"<x<=",i[2],sep="")))

Hi, I have a dataframe wf existing of a header with different labels and beneath the values of those labels : wf: label1 label2 ... 0,45 0,21 0,10 0,45 .... .... I have a list fl <- c("label2","label3",..) Isn't possible to use the list elements in the list in order to subtract values from the dataframe? like : wf$fl[[1]] When I do in R I get :NULL

I just use wxRuby and I have problem I use background image on my app and when I create label it seem look background of label is gray, how can I change it into transparent???? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, Previously, while running Dovecot 2.2.27/Pigeonhole 0.4.16 the following code snippet was working as one would expect: if duplicate { addflag ["\\seen", "Duplicate"]; fileinto "Duplicate"; stop; } if address :contains "to" "user.email at example.com" { addflag "$label1"; } After upgrading to

Dear all, I am trying to find a suitable R-function for parametric proportional hazard regressions. The package survival contains the coxph() function which performs a Cox regression which leaves the base hazard unspecified, i.e. it is a semi-parametric method. The package Design contains the function pphsm() which is good for parametric proportional hazard regressions when the underlying base

I am racking my brain over this, probably because I only know very simple mysql functions. Basically I''ve got a few tables, ex: Albums (id,name,band_id); Bands (id,name,label_id), and Label (id,name) I want to search through both album.name, band.name, and label.name throwing all results into a variable, with no redundant info. I think what I need to be doing is setting up some

I've converted most of our users from Outlook to Thunderbird. One important feature of Thunderbird is that it pays attention to the IMAP non-standard message flags via the 'tags' feature (see http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir). This is important because 2 users make extensive use of Outlook categories (Tags, in Thunderbird). I found that when I set a message to the 1st

Hi, Andrew, Thank you for answering my question. What's the status of misched? is it experimental? I found it is disabled by default for all architectures(3.4svn). I also don't understand the algorithm. Could you point to me more papers or text materials about your approach? it seems that you want to balance register pressure and ILP in misched. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:07 PM,