similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm::Pass::Pass(llvm::PassKind, intptr_t): Assertion `pid && "pid cannot be 0"' failed.

llvm/include/llvm/Pass.h:93: llvm::Pass::Pass(llvm::PassKind, intptr_t): Assertion `pid && "pid cannot be 0"' failed. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Surinder <surifilms at gmail.com> wrote: > I have written a new pass, it compiles ok but crashes when i run it > with error (llvm::Pass::Pass(llvm::PassKind, intptr_t): Assertion `pid > && "pid

I am creating a new pass (function pass) called Dfl from the Hello example and notes on "Writing an LLVM Pass". When I compile the program I get inncomplete type error (llvm/include/llvm/Pass.h:188: error: incomplete type 'llvm::DominatorTree' used in nested name specifier). The code is given below. Surinder struct Dfl : public FunctionPass { raw_ostream *Out; static

Hi Surinder, Did you remember to #include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"? Best, Douglas On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Surinder <surifilms at gmail.com> wrote: > I am creating a new pass (function pass) called Dfl from the Hello > example and notes on "Writing an LLVM Pass". When I compile the > program I get inncomplete type error

Hi Sam, Thanks for your reply. I am implementing my research (http://www.it.usyd.edu.au/~suri/Detecting%20Buffer%20Over.pdf), a translation of LLVM to a simple non-deterministic language to detect buffer overflows. It involves (1) printing a control flow graph of basic blocks of a function (easily done) (2) translating each llvm statement to a corresponding data flow language (needs ASTs to

Has anyone written a grammar for LLVM for ANTLR. I mean an ANTLR grammar that parses LLVM instructions. Is an LLVM grammar available for any other parsing tool? Surinder

Hello Surinder, The existing hand-written parser is callable from almost anywhere so the only reason you'd need to have a parser for it would be to extend it. Originally it was written using Flex and Bison but Chris Lattner rewrote it from scratch to catch more errors at the parsing stage. The only feature I've found to be missing from the existing LLVM-AS utility was an include

I am getting a segmentation fault as soon as I touch the Basic block *b value defined as :  std::string getPHIAssigns(const PHINode *PH)  { const BasicBlock *b = PH->getParent();    errs() << b->size(); where as getPHIAssigns is being called from               for (BasicBlock::iterator ins=b->begin(), e3=b->end(); ins!=e3; ++ins, ++l) // get instructions                

I have a pointer to a basic block and am iterating thru its predecessor blocks. I want to get a pointer to the predecessor block. How do I do it. I am using following code and it given compile time errors. error: cannot convert 'llvm::const_pred_iterator' to 'const llvm::BasicBlock*' in initialization const BasicBlock *b = PH->getParent(); // process all pred block

Hi Surinder, You'll need to dereference your iterator to get a pointer: const BasicBlock *p = *pr; Cheers, Lang. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Surinder <surifilms at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a pointer to a basic block and am iterating thru its > predecessor blocks. I want to get a pointer to the predecessor block. > How do I do it. I am using following code and it

Hi Surinder, I don't see anything obviously wrong with your code. I suggest that (1) you build LLVM with assertions enabled, (2) you run the verifier on your bitcode, and (3) run your program under valgrind. Ciao, Duncan. > I am getting a segmentation fault as soon as I touch the Basic block > *b value defined as : > > std::string getPHIAssigns(const PHINode *PH) > {

Is the pass "Break Critical edges" acheives the same as edge-splitting SSA, i.e., a node has either multiple predecessors or multiple successors but not both. A node with multiple predecessors and multiple successors is replaced by two consecutive nodes joined together. The first node has multiple predecessors and second node as its only successor. The second node has first node as

Hi, I get this error: ------------------ Reader.cpp:464: error: `intptr_t' undeclared (first use this function) ------------------ It doesn't seem that you include <stddef.h>, where the intptr_t is declared, in the source file. When I included the header, it compiled without errors. The same error seems to be present for ReaderWrappers.cpp. /Henrik

ambika wrote: > Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using, > > void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.setPreservesAll(); > AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); > } > > and then I use it as, > > > bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module &M) { > > DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); > ...... >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have an IBM xseries 345, running CentOS 5.3, hosting a few Xen domUs. However, I need more RAM -- but cannot remember if all (four) RAM sockets are populated (which would mean to buy higher capacity modules) or if there are two slots left to use. However, I'd like (and think that it's possible, but don't remember how) to

On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 23:17 +0200, Peter Tuharsky via samba wrote: > Hallo, > > there is not much happening on this topic in mailing list, so I hope > there is a base to revive this old thread. I see that Samba is making > great progress, but as usually, it is hard to keep up with Microsoft > changes. > > So far, Samba supports 2008 R2 DFL, and has only experimental

This make sure there is no mismatch between the size of the integer value that Int64_val returns, and the size of the guestfs_h pointer. This should fix the warning on 32bit environments (and thus build, when --enable-werror is enabled). --- mllib/visit-c.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mllib/visit-c.c b/mllib/visit-c.c index b46dd33..b1c1216 100644 ---

?Not sure if this actually made it to the list the first time.? Here is the SERIAL output (bottom of message after your questions).? Googling the error indicates it's something people ran into a few years back but was supposedly fixed.? Any ideas? I can verify that if I REMOVE the second CPU, it boots into Xen kernel no problem.? The CPU itself doesn't matter, as I can swap either

ambika wrote: > But this is already present in my pass. > And I am not able to understand the cause for the error: > Can you send a copy of your getAnalysisUsage() method for your pass? There are some funny errors that can occur when you do things that the PassManager cannot handle. For example, if you're requiring a transform pass, that can cause strange assertions from the

Hi all I've been thinking about using CentOS on a Dell R200 server and turn it into a firewall / network monitor / traffic shaper in our datacentre, instead of using a dedicated firewall device. One of the devices that I have been looking at, with my limited budget, is the D-Link DFL 860 - http://www.netdefend.eu/Product.aspx?m=15&ref=DFL-860 It provides AV, SPI, VPN, DOS, P2P, etc

John Criswell wrote: > ambika wrote: >> Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using, >> >> void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage&AU) const { >> AU.setPreservesAll(); >> AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); >> } >> >> and then I use it as, >> >> >> bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module&M) { >> >>