similar to: [LLVMdev] ldc a D compiler search contributor

On 03.12.2013 14:30, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Can you send a patch? Hi Rafael, the patch is attached. @Mikael, Tim Thanks for the help. I really needed only the link to the repo. Regards, Kai > > On 2 December 2013 06:44, Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC >> compiler. All

Hello, While trying to find out why the LDC compiler refuses to generate object code for MSP430 targets (but generates MSP430 assembly or LLVM IR/bitcode), I came across the following apparent inconsistency. This works: $ clang --target=msp430 -c test.c This doesn't work: $ clang --target=msp430 -S -emit-llvm test.c $ llc -filetype=obj test.ll /opt/msp430/bin/llc: target does not support

Can you send a patch? On 2 December 2013 06:44, Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> wrote: > Hi! > > I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC > compiler. All links are currently out-of-date. The following pages need > updates: > > On page http://www.llvm.org/Users.html, please replace the existing entry > "LLVM D Compiler" in section

Hi! I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC compiler. All links are currently out-of-date. The following pages need updates: On page http://www.llvm.org/Users.html, please replace the existing entry "LLVM D Compiler" in section "Open Source Projects" with: <tr> <td><a href="http://wiki.dlang.org/LDC/">

On Oct 27, 2008, at 11:03 PM, Kelly W wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I just thought I would let people here know that ldc (llvm backend > for the D Programming Language) is getting pretty usable (a few > larger libraries compile) and it now has x86-64 support added. I > decided to run some timings on some D and C++ code to compare ldc to > dmd (the mainline compiler),

Hello everyone, I just thought I would let people here know that ldc (llvm backend for the D Programming Language) is getting pretty usable (a few larger libraries compile) and it now has x86-64 support added. I decided to run some timings on some D and C++ code to compare ldc to dmd (the mainline compiler), gdc (the gcc based D compiler) and g++. I used a ray tracing program found in this

Maybe it's time to add it to the LLVM projects list. :) The original annoucement on digitalmars.D.announce and http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/projects/index.php/2009/01/09/ldc-09-released/ was: --- The first version of LDC (http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc), the LLVM based compiler for version one of the D programming language has been released for x86-32 Linux. Get it here:

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Nicholas Wilson < iamthewilsonator at hotmail.com> wrote: > Luís, try using the -no-integrated-as flag to execute the assembler for > you. > We should probably make that the default for MSP430. > Cool. When I did that on macOS, LDC generated a lot of complaints, possibly because it is assuming mach-o files. I tried changing from -mtriple=msp430

You need to get the LLVM Sphinx docs using SVN or Git. If you want it, I can do the changes for you since I have already everything in place. -- Mikael 2013/12/3 Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> > Hi Rafael, > > is there a repository with the static pages or should I simply produce a > diff between the 2 versions? > > Regards, > Kai > > On 03.12.2013 14:30,

Hi Rafael, is there a repository with the static pages or should I simply produce a diff between the 2 versions? Regards, Kai On 03.12.2013 14:30, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Can you send a patch? > > On 2 December 2013 06:44, Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC >> compiler.

Compiling for AArch64: CommandLine Error: Option 'aarch64-branch-relax' registered more than once! Hi all! I am trying to run LDC (LLVM-based D compiler) on AArch64. The compiler contains all IR and target specific passes. You can view it as combined llc/opt tool. It uses the same strategy as opt to collect the passes with the NameParser. Like llc, it calls

Hi everybody. I'm having (yet) another look at trying to get naked functions from D (1) working in our LLVM D Compiler - LDC (2). I have this test case: /// D CODE /// extern(C) int printf(char*, ...); ulong retval() { asm { naked; mov EAX, 0xff; mov EDX, 0xaa; ret; } } ulong retval2() { return (cast(ulong)0xaa << 32) | 0xff; } void main() {

Hey Chris et al., >> Hello everyone, >> >> I just thought I would let people here know that ldc (llvm backend >> for the D Programming Language) is getting pretty usable (a few >> larger libraries compile) and it now has x86-64 support added. . . >Wow, very very nice! Have you pointed this out to the other D users? >-Chris Yes, I have let

In first, i hope i can discuss here I would like generate a shared lib without gcc but i fail. With my D compiler i do: $ ldc2 --output-bc --output-o -op -release -c -relocation-model=pic -od=../build *.d llvm bytecode finish with .wc and are in ../build directory $ cd ../build $ lvm-ld -link-as-library -o libDparser.bc -L/usr/local/lib64/ -L/usr/lib64 -ldruntime-ldc -llphobos2 -lm -ldl -lrt

Kai Nacke via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Compiling for AArch64: CommandLine Error: Option > 'aarch64-branch-relax' registered more than once! > > Hi all! > > I am trying to run LDC (LLVM-based D compiler) on AArch64. The > compiler contains all IR and target specific passes. You can view it > as combined llc/opt tool. It uses the same

Hi, I'm having difficulty to replicate in R a nested (hierarchical) anova example found in p. 308 of Zar, J.H. 1996. Bostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall. 3rd ed. The example (15.1) is as follows: The variable is blood cholesterol concentration in women (in mg/100 ml of plasma). This variable was measured after the administration of one of three different drugs, each drug having been

On 3 December 2013 16:08, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > You need to get the LLVM Sphinx docs using SVN or Git. If you want it, I > can do the changes for you since I have already everything in place. I think the changes he wants actually are in static html pages, at http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/www/trunk. Cheers. Tim.

Oh, sorry. Thought everything had been converted to Sphinx. Any particular reason why there are still static pages left on the website? -- Mikael 2013/12/3 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> > On 3 December 2013 16:08, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > > You need to get the LLVM Sphinx docs using SVN or Git. If you want it, I > > can do the

Hello all! I extended the LDC2 with a pragma to register a funcion in the llvm.global_ctors or llvm.global_dtors list. On Linux, references to these functions are placed in .ctors and .dtors sections and everything runs fine. On Windows, functions from llvm.global_ctors are placed in section .CRT$XCU, which is automatically called by the MS C Runtime. However, functions from

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Taner Tas <taner76 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We have a Samba AD DC service running on Ubuntu 16.0.4 with Samba > > 4.3.11. We are planning to upgrade it to a recent version, probably > > 4.8.3. > > > > I think that I have two options: > > > > a) Package upgrade via 3rd party