similar to: [LLVMdev] Patch for V7M

Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello > "T2Divide" should be a subtarget feature bit. This way it can be > "automatically" assigned to the procesor. I agree this is a better approach. > The instruction selection patterns for t2{S,U}DIV should be also > guarded by this predicate. Is this necessary? Since the absence of the predicate causes lowering to expand

OK, here's a patch that follows your suggestion. I'm not an authorized developer, so I can't commit it myself. The test case is also attached again. bagel Jim Grosbach wrote: > Ah, ok. I was comparing v7-A and v7-R only. The M3 is described in > separate documentation (mostly since it lacks the ARM mode instructions, > I suspect). In any case, as far as I can tell, not

Hello > Is this necessary?  Since the absence of the predicate causes lowering to > expand divides, the pattern should never show up. Just to guard codegen bugs. If anything went wrong (when predicates will be used) then you'll get nice assertion "cannot yet select". > Agreed.  Now how do we get this done? Just look how ArmV7A is defined and do something similar... --

Hello LLVM, Does the community have bots or humans tracking code size for -Os builds? I've noticed troubling regressions lately. Sometime near Nov 5, the EEMBC bitmnp01 benchmark grew by 25% for ARMv7m and 35% for i586. That's ghastly. This week, the EEMBC matrix01 workload grew by 5% for ARMv7m and 3% for i586. Regards, -steve

On 22 July 2012 20:42, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> Any suggestions? > Try to specify CPU explicitly. He shouldn't have to, but that might help. Maybe setting -march? This is a big mess... I thought that v7 always assumed Thumb2 for the thumb flag, and v7M should always assume Cortex-M3 CPU if none provided. It's funny that James had a great

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 19 November 2015 at 19:08, Steve King via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Does the community have bots or humans tracking code size for -Os >> builds? > > Hi Steve, > > I still haven't got around doing a CI for EEMBC or SPEC on ARM. I do > track

Hello > OK, here's a patch that follows your suggestion.  I'm not an authorized > developer, so I can't commit it myself.  The test case is also attached > again. "T2Divide" should be a subtarget feature bit. This way it can be "automatically" assigned to the procesor. The instruction selection patterns for t2{S,U}DIV should be also guarded by this

> Any suggestions? Try to specify CPU explicitly. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi, I am trying to cross compile code for ARM Cortex m0, m3, and m4. For m0, I use: -target armv6--eabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 That seems to work. For m3 and m4, I use the following which does not work (fatal error: error in backend: CPU: 'cortex-m3' does not support ARM mode): -target armv7m--eabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 and -target armv7em--eabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 Who can help me with the

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 22 July 2012 22:03, salvatore benedetto > <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote: >> While we are at it, if a new comer would like to understand where everything >> takes place, where should he look? >> >> I did a grep in the source and eventually ended up in

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:08 PM, salvatore benedetto <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: >> On 18 July 2012 15:46, salvatore benedetto >> <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote: >>> $ clang++ -ccc-host-triple thumbv7m-none-gnueabi noInclude.cpp -c >>>

On Jul 23, 2012, at 1:52 PM, salvatore benedetto <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: >> On 23 July 2012 17:03, Chris Cadwallader <ccadwallader at arxan.com> wrote: >>> On Darwin, if -march is armv7 clang's driver will assume you want thumb2 unless you also give it

Maybe adjust this to be different for –Os, -Oz than for –O2? Kevin Smith From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of James Molloy via llvm-dev Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 4:05 PM To: Steve King <steve at metrokings.com>; Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Recent -Os code

On 22 July 2012 22:03, salvatore benedetto <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote: > While we are at it, if a new comer would like to understand where everything > takes place, where should he look? > > I did a grep in the source and eventually ended up in clang/something/driver. That's pretty much it: clang/lib/Driver

Hello LLVMdev!! Yesterday I posted a patch request to the llvm-commits list requesting that someone could apply a patch to Triple.h and Triple.cpp for me. I didn't get any response so I wondered whether I should have posted to this list instead. My story is as follows: we are trying to get lldb/llvm support for CSRs range of Kalimba DSPs. Eventually we are planning to hire someone to

Hello, I'm new on this list. First of all, thank you to all the developers of this great project! At the moment there is only an application that keeps me on both macos and windows, its name is PWGL a free environment for computer assisted composition in openGL. (http://www2.siba.fi/PWGL/) I'm running Ubuntu 8.04 and wine 0.9.59. I have to say that I also installed vcrun2005 and

Hi everybody, like in the subject: is there a way for telling libvirt to auto define an xml under /etc/libvirt/qemu? I mean, sometimes it happens to have the /etc/libvirt/qemu shared between nodes, say with a NFS share, since I can set a new xml on a node and I want o see the virtual machine on all the others, is there a way to automate this or am I obligated to launch virsh define <xml> on

> > $ qemu-arm -cpu ? > > Available CPUs: > > arm926 arm946 arm1026 arm1136 arm1136-r2 arm1176 arm11mpcore > > cortex-m3 > > cortex-a8 > > cortex-a8-r2 cortex-a9 cortex-a15 ti925t pxa250 sa1100 sa1110 > pxa255 pxa260 > > pxa261 pxa262 pxa270 pxa270-a0 pxa270-a1 pxa270-b0 pxa270-b1 xa270- > c0 > > pxa270-c5 any > > >

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 22 July 2012 20:42, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >>> Any suggestions? >> Try to specify CPU explicitly. > > He shouldn't have to, but that might help. Maybe setting -march? This > is a big mess... > > I thought that v7 always assumed

On Darwin, if -march is armv7 clang's driver will assume you want thumb2 unless you also give it -mno-thumb but that is irrelevant with mcpu=cortex-m3. I agree its a mess. -Chris On Jul 22, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 22 July 2012 20:42, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >>> Any suggestions? >> Try to specify CPU explicitly. >