similar to: [LLVMdev] I source required?

If your project works with LLVM 2.7 and you want it included in the release notes, please email me a blurb to include ASAP. -Chris

Hi All, I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements. There are "a lot" of changes that went into 2.8, but I think I've scraped most of them out of the commits. However, it is also highly likely that I missed something, so if I missed your favorite feature, please speak

Hi All, With 2.9 starting to make its way out into the world, it is time to start poking at the release notes. I plan to make a pass through llvm-commits to cull some of the major changes into bullets, but am already behind and insanely busy with other stuff over the next week. If you have commit access, I'd really appreciate it if you could take a pass through llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html

On 2010-10-04 06:43, Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements. There are "a lot" of changes that went into 2.8, but I think I've scraped most of them out of the commits. However, it is also highly likely that I

Frits van Bommel skrev: > Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> At the moment llvm-config outputs "2.6svn" if llvm is build from trunk >> >> $ llvm-config --version >> 2.6svn >> >> Some external projects (built out-of-tree) need to know which revision >> of llvm is installed. LDC currently asks llvm-config --src-root for the >> source

Hi I am trying to create a new LLVM project that uses autoconf to configure it. the example requires me to define * LLVM_SRC_ROOT - The root of the LLVM source tree. * LLVM_OBJ_ROOT - The root of the LLVM object tree Is this required? Why? I just want to use the libraries that were installed using Ubuntu 10.04. I can compile programs using llvmc $ llvmc --version Low Level

Xerxes Rånby wrote: > Frits van Bommel skrev: >> Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>> The attached patch modifies the llvm build system (both autotools and >>> cmake) to write the revision into PACKAGE_VERSION: >>> >>> $ llvm-config --version >>> 2.6-71981 >>> >> I don't think that's enough for LDC; we want to be able to

well, I had the site and page and I had added the relevant backport but it didn't work and i keep installing R 2.7 . Don't know why; i probably missed something. #### May be you should add in your mail the file : /etc/apt/sources.list (I suppose there might be a typo, as IT addresses are long and booring, and AFAIK, correcting a typo one made is **very** difficult). FYI binary installs

Andrew Haley wrote: > Jeff Kuskin wrote: > > Apologies if this is a FAQ. > > > > I am using the LLVM JIT facility on an x86_64 platform. I generate > > IR for a single function using IRBuilder(), use the > > FunctionPassManager to do some optimization passes, and then call > > ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction() to get a native-code version > > of

Hi I am trying to create a new LLVM project that uses autoconf to configure it. the example requires me to define * LLVM_SRC_ROOT - The root of the LLVM source tree. * LLVM_OBJ_ROOT - The root of the LLVM object tree Is this required? Why? I just want to use the libraries that were installed using Ubuntu 10.04. I can compile programs using llvmc $ llvmc --version Low Level

Benjamin Kramer wrote: > At the moment llvm-config outputs "2.6svn" if llvm is build from trunk > > $ llvm-config --version > 2.6svn > > Some external projects (built out-of-tree) need to know which revision > of llvm is installed. LDC currently asks llvm-config --src-root for the > source directory and then parses svn info's output to get the revision

Apologies if this is a FAQ. I am using the LLVM JIT facility on an x86_64 platform. I generate IR for a single function using IRBuilder(), use the FunctionPassManager to do some optimization passes, and then call ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction() to get a native-code version of the function. Everything works fine so far. Two questions: Question (1): How can I get the size of the native

At the moment llvm-config outputs "2.6svn" if llvm is build from trunk $ llvm-config --version 2.6svn Some external projects (built out-of-tree) need to know which revision of llvm is installed. LDC currently asks llvm-config --src-root for the source directory and then parses svn info's output to get the revision number. This requires the user to keep the llvm source tree

Hi i'm a new user but rsync is easy and a great tool I have a folder caled source and a folder caled destini, like this + Source |_ FolderA |____ File1 |____ File2 + Destini I use this comando to sync only File 1 rsync -a Souce/FolderA/File1 Destini it's copy the File 1 to Destini but i would like who rsync create te Folder A in the destini and put the File 1 inside Then. I read

The latest updates to CentOS 5.5 seem to have broken the Java plugin, and have defeated any and all attempts to get it working again. I'm running CentOS 5.5 (32-bit) and Firefox 3.6.9 (installed from the CentOS repository); I've tried BOTH the openJDK plugin available through the Argeo repositories, and installing Java 1.6.0 directly from Sun/Oracle and creating the plugin soft link in

Hi all, I am lookng for a truble ticket to install on my Cents os 4.4 server. RPM is always prefferd. Souce is also welcome. Have you done somethink like this before? What are the packages that you recomend for me. -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

hello, now that i have dynamic source auth working fine, i wonder if it's possible to also create a souce dynamically, i.e. without defining a specific mount in icecast.xml? I've seen some hints, but havn't found it in the docs. tips appreciated, thanks, uno

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > >>> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser >>> to make sure, that the right java version is activated. >> >> This

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 14:51, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: >>> On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote: >>> >>>> Where would I do that? This is something

Hello, I'm try to run speex on some ARM processor. I'd like to cut away some speex features including VBR, ABR and preprocessor while still supporting VAD/DTX. But I've found some puzzles in the source code regarding VAD as below, 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. Will VAD still work If I don't use the source file preprocess.c? 2)The speex manual