similar to: [LLVMdev] Running "make check" on Windows yields lots of unwarrented unexpected failures (HTML free this time:-)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Running "make check" on Windows yields lots of unwarrented unexpected failures (HTML free this time:-)"

2010 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] Running "make check" on Windows yields lots of unwarrented unexpected failures (HTML free this time:-)
Dirk, I am working on tests/win32(s) too. I can let all tests pass on msvc10 and cygming with my patches, thought, my patches are incomplete (several of them hide potential problems) Please see threads below in llvm-commits. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100927/109077.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20101004/109271.html If you are
2010 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] Running "make check" on Windows yields lots of unwarrented unexpected failures
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" background="https://img.web.de/v/p.gif" class="bgRepeatYes" style="background-repeat: repeat; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: verdana,geneva; font-size: 9pt; padding-left: 0px;"><div style="min-height: 200px; background-image: url(https://img.web.de/v/p.gif); background-repeat:
2005 Jan 16
2
OCFS disk failure problem.
Hi, Irecently setup a Oracle 10g RAC test environment with two HP/Compaq DL380s and a shared disk array. The array is presented as a single 136GB disk. The systems are running RedHat AS 3.0 Update 4. OCFS 1.0.13-PROD1 build: 5e87201061935f464cf6541c56eb2827 Oracle 10g 10.1.0.3.0 I was able to get everything working, had a database created and running an instance on each system. The
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
Hi Chandler, There were five SEH releated patches posted in two threads in the last days. Two different patches in Martell e-mail starting this thread: the win64 seh (llvm) and the register names Three more related SEH patches in another thread: one for win64 seh clang, one for MinGW toolchain and another for unreachable prologue. To clarify and allow proper reviews for the different patches I
2012 Aug 28
2
Compile syslinux64.exe on ubuntu
Hello, I wanted to recompile syslinux64.exe (windows 64bit binary) on ubuntu. The default ./find-mingw64.sh script failed to locate mingw64 on ubuntu, even after root at htpc:~# apt-get install gcc-mingw-w64 So I had to patch the script to let it find mingw64 on ubuntu as well. Patch is below, please apply to syslinux sources: --- syslinux-4.05/win64/find-mingw64.sh.orig 2012-08-28
2011 Jan 23
2
[PATCH][git-pull] win64/find-mingw64.sh: Debian/Ubuntu
git://git.zytor.com/users/genec/syslinux.git Branch win64-mingw32-ubuntu-for-hpa This adds the compiler prefix used in Debian/Ubuntu to the list (amd64-mingw32msvc-). Too bad /bin/sh doesn't support brace expansion. -- -Gene
2012 Jun 11
5
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy?
Hi, [Synopsis: Mikael thinks Windows support is overlooked and that this is a strategic error. You can skip to the next mail now, if you'd like :-) Long, long, long mail follows.] Before I go on, I'd like to informally apologize for my many postings to this mailing list. I have no intentions of spamming it, but I still feel a need to grasp certain things that seem to be implied by the
2014 Apr 18
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
In summary we have no less than six patches required to support Win64 SEH MinGW. The first five could be committed after review and LGTM but the last one also requires Ray Donnelly approval. Please comment in the Phabricator so the comments would be kept in context. 'unreachable' trap http://reviews.llvm.org/D3417 Win64 SEH (LLVM) http://reviews.llvm.org/D3418 Win64 SEH (clang)
2010 Jan 04
2
I have finished compiling of R 64 bit on 64 bit Windows use MINGW64
hi ,everyone I have finished compiling of R 64 bit on 64 bit Windows system by using MINGW64, include the standard and recommended packages.tested it on Windows 2008 server R2 X64.it run very well.I wander anyone interested in it ,and anyone who want to continue testing  it with me?  and who can provide a space let me upload the R files Best wishes!                    2010/1/4                    
2010 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Is the Win64 codegen issue fixed?
Great! Are there other issues I should be aware of? Félix Le 2010-11-25 à 07:43:23, Anton Korobeynikov a écrit : > Hello Felix > >> I have a project in mind that involves using the JIT for a few targets (x86 >> and x86_64 processors on Mac OS, Linux and Windows). However, there is an >> open bug that says LLVM generates incorrect code for Win64. >> Eli's last
1998 Dec 07
3
How to sync /etc/smbpasswd with /etc/passwd ?
While we do sync our /etc/passwd whenever /etc/smbpasswd is changed via the Samba sync option that does not seem to be possible the other way round: I just want a /etc/smbpasswd generated from my /etc/passwd with the correct passwords as used for the UniX login... Is that possible ? Regards, -- /(__ __|\ Lars Steinke, Research Student @ ( \/ __)_
2010 Dec 10
0
[LLVMdev] Is the Win64 codegen issue fixed?
Felix, > Great! Are there other issues I should be aware of? There might be some issues wrt tailcalls, but I'd not expect anything else to be major broken. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2011 Feb 28
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [PATCH] Windows improvements
Hello Erik, Thank you to work. I have not checked to build them, though, I can tell you some comments, excuse me. * General - Please post patches to cfe-commits and to llvm-commits, too. (IMHO it would not be needed to split articles apart each lists as long as each would be related.) - If you can, please attach files w/o CRLF(dos encodings), or with attached text/plain. - You may
2012 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy?
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi, > > [Synopsis: Mikael thinks Windows support is overlooked and that this is a > strategic error. ...] > Synopsis of my response: It is not overlooked, it has some technical, non-technical, and manpower limitations. Allow me to briefly summarize these issues: Technical: Currently, we have
2012 May 28
1
[LLVMdev] Make install drops 64-bit LLVM in Windows x86 program folder
Hi, I just did a "make install" on Win7x64 using Mingw64 and it dropped off the files in "C:\Program Files (x86)\LLVM". That's almost right, but nicer would be if the 64-bit build was dropped off in "C:\Program Files\LLVM". I am fairly confident that it is me who is doing something wrong because I simply do this: (retrieve trunk version of LLVM, Clang,
2012 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] [RFC] Makefile: add mingw objects conditionally
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle at tiscali.nl> --- 0) If I build syslinux on a system without mingw a (successful) build will end with: ls: cannot access win32/syslinux.exe: No such file or directory ls: cannot access win64/syslinux64.exe: No such file or directory [...] make: [all] Error 2 (ignored) Ie, it ends with an ignored error. That's confusing (and a bit
2013 Jan 13
5
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> Good points David, I don't feel qualified to evaluate the differences >> between those versions though... Perhaps Richard or Doug could comment here? > > Unless I'm misreading the buildbots, we don't actually have anything > trying to build with MSVC. Have we considered how
2013 Feb 04
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Promote AArch64 to be built by default
> I think this is the right thing to do. Once you've resolved the Mac and Windows issues, go for it. Thanks Doub. Just to let people know what happened. I enabled in r174322 around lunchtime. Here's a report of the noticed failures with status (important/outstanding ones at the top). Feel free to do anything from telling me about more problems to reverting the patch when llvm.org comes
2013 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] Patch to compile LLVM with MSVC 2010
>From the DeveloperPolicy.html document I gathered I need to send a patch to this list (which I did); could you clarify if I misunderstood it? The second patch is really trivial and I think it's worth applying - it seems like a typo by someone who tested on MSVC 11 but not 10; or maybe my local instance of MSVC10 is somehow deficient, of course. The first patch is adding MSVC-specific
2014 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: How to represent SEH (__try / __except) in LLVM IR
Thanks for the additional information. Right now I’m experimenting with a mix of code compiled with MSVC and code compiled with clang, trying to get a C++ exception thrown and caught by the MSVC-compiled code across a function in the clang-compiled code. My goal here is to isolate a small part of what needs to be done in a way that lends itself to tinkering. I think this might lead me to the