similar to: [LLVMdev] PFO

On 21 July 2010 22:14, Reza Yazdani <ry.yazdani at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. > It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build > them with LTO now. I followed the directions in > "http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html" and built ar, nm-new, and

Hi Reza, -O4 is the highest level of LLVM optimization that I know of. But, I don't know if it has been tried on Spec2006. IIRC, Dan Gohman has run Spec. tests with LLVM, so he can provide more info. - fariborz On Jul 19, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Hi, > > What are the best options to compile Spec2006 with LLVM compilers to > get the best performance numbers

433.milc, 447.deall, and 450.soplex are run as part of the nightly tests on Darwin (=MacOSX) in a way that closely approximates -O4. They are working there. I am inclined to suspect gold given that they work at -O3. Can a Linux person comment? On Jul 23, 2010, at 10:19 AMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Following is the list of fp benchmarks that fail. They all pass with > -O3, but

On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Hi, > > I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 > out 17 of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I > made a mistake in my build? Hi Reza. Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't think it's normal. You may have checked out the source at a moment when it had a bug

Following is the list of fp benchmarks that fail. They all pass with -O3, but some fail with -O4. I did the test run. Thanks, Reza Estimated Estimated Base Base Base Peak Peak Peak Benchmarks Ref. Run Time Ratio Ref. Run Time Ratio -------------- ------ --------- ---------

Hello, I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build them with LTO now. I followed the directions in " http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html" and built ar, nm-new, and ld-new in binutils. I also built libLLVMgold.so. I get the following error: llvm-gcc: -use-gold-plugin,

Hi, What are the best options to compile Spec2006 with LLVM compilers to get the best performance numbers on x86? Has anybody compared LLVM Spec2006 numbers with GCC 4.5 base? reza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100719/40cf38a5/attachment.html>

Hi, I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out 17 of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a mistake in my build? Reza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100722/4c4a81a9/attachment.html>

Dear R-Help, >From reading the help file, it is my understanding the the download.file() function does not support HTTPS connections. So therefore, understandably, the follow produces an error: ### R Code > url <- "https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2008-October/thread.html" > destfile <- "//PFO-SBS001/Redirected/tonyb/Desktop/R_web_test/tmp.txt" >

On Aug 26, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Stephen Crane <sjcrane at uci.edu> wrote: > We have been working on adding randomness into code generation > to create a diverse population of binaries. This diversity prevents > code-reuse attacks such as return-oriented-programming (ROP) by > denying the attacker information about the exact code layout. Putting on my security hat (as opposed to

I can't make R on a Solaris 9 box. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks in advance. <3>-> make `Makedeps' is up to date. `libbz2.a' is up to date. `Makedeps' is up to date. `libpcre.a' is up to date. `Makedeps' is up to date. `libz.a' is up to date. ../../../src/include/libintl.h is unchanged ../../../include/libintl.h is unchanged `localecharset.h'

Dear Madam/Sir: I downloaded the latest source file (version 3.0.1) and follow = "Manifest" guide to build the binaries, but got failure. OS: Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) Kernel: 2.4.18-3 on an i686 ***** Procedures I did to build: [max@localhost source]$ ls -l configure -rwxr-xr-x 1 max max 973150 Feb 6 10:30 configure [max@localhost source]$ ./configure :

Thanks for that email. The one lihe change I made is this : from #define FLAC__MAX_RICE_PARTITION_ORDER (15u) to #define FLAC__MAX_RICE_PARTITION_ORDER (6u) and that seemed to make decoder_new() happy, but it's promptly crashing after making a call to the read callback (below), then to the meta callback. The meta callback did nothing but print a string and return. I removed it, and

Hi, Arvind Sudarsanam: I know some of Open64. Above all, Open64 is designed for a high performance compiler. It is now supported by AMD, HP, ICT Chinese Academy of Science, etc. and has been ported to X86, Itanium, Loongson CPU etc. And to your questions 1, Open64 already have some main optimization phases, Inline for aggressive inline opt. LNO for loop opt, WOPT for machine independent opt(

I changed just the FLAC__EntropyCodingMethod_PartitionedRice struct, but it hasn't changed a thing. I'm still getting the same behaviour. typedef struct { unsigned order; unsigned parameters[1 << 6]; unsigned raw_bits[1 << 6]; } FLAC__EntropyCodingMethod_PartitionedRice; Any other thoughts? Thanks, Reza Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Reza Naima

Hi, I have some S functions plus Fortran routines that I want to use in R. They work in S, but when I try to use "dyn.load" to link fortran codes in R , I get the following error. thanks, reza (I am using R-1.0.1 on windows NT, The name of fortran file (compiled Ratfor) is deldirld.o and it's in the D:\Reza\476\tv.gonsrc.R\ directory) >dyn.load("deldirld.o") Error in

--- Reza Naima <reza@reza.net> wrote: > I've cross-compiled flac for the armv4l processor (rio receiver), and > > i'm trying to start up a decode thread : > > #include <FLAC/stream_decoder.h> > .... > FLAC__StreamDecoder *flac = NULL; > flac = FLAC__stream_decoder_new(); > if (flac == NULL) { >

Hi, I tried that out, I got a new error about pthreads in my config.log. Could you take another look. Thanks again, Reza > On Aug 20, 2019, at 12:36 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:29:15PM -0400, reza shahriari wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have attached my compressed config file. >> >> Thanks,

The wiki page settings control a netlogon security setting. I guess the "server signing" parameter applies to all the other traffic. But my guess - and it is only a guess- is that requiring server signing is causing the netlogon process to break since it does not support signing. The e-mail chain you reference does not make it clear if the samba instance is a domain

Hi, Thank you for your repky. I downloaded llvm-2.8 and installed it by first ./configure and then ./make it. It was installed in /usr/local as i expected. However, when i tried to run llvm-config-2.8, for example --version, it was not ran. Then, I used apt-get to installed the llvm-2.8-dev to have llvm-config. Did i do anything wrong? Also i do not know if these two installed llvms are