similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM + GCC a simple tutorial/example?

Hi Ryan, On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:06 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am trying to disassemble some bytecode using llvm-dis: > llvm-dis -f -o llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc.ll llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc > > However, I am getting the following error. > > llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: 464C457F (Vers=0, Pos=4) The problem is most likely that sliceme2.cbc is *not* bytecode. Open the

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Misha Brukman wrote: > Karl, I think you meant to cc the llvmdev list on this. > > Thank you for a more detailed explanation, it's much clearer to me now. That does make more sense to me too. > I agree that making the execution of .bc files more transparent would > make it more useable as a stand-alone binary format on Unix-like systems > and adding

... is on SourceForge: http://tcng.sourceforge.net/dist/tcng-10a.tar.gz md5sum 3f58447fdf393cbe3c584d80089806dc See also http://tcng.sourceforge.net/ This release changes a bunch of things, hence the jump in the version number: - the name of the traffic control compiler has changed from "tcc" to "tcng". This has become necessary because of a name conflicy with the

Hi Thanks for the info, it led to the source of the error I was having. I was using llvm-gcc binaries (built with mingw I guess) to compile a .c file that is my language runtime, llvm-link'ing that with my frontend's .ll, and using an vcpp-built lli to run the resulting bytecode. This caused the special case in X86RegisterInfo::emitPrologue for "main" to try to align the stack

hi, im creating a music application(image below). At the moment im using tcc compiler but im moving across to clang because of the improved compiler warnings. Can anyone please explain and show code so I can use clang's JIT to call functions in my application? Thanks. http://old.nabble.com/file/p29449300/51709341.jpeg -- View this message in context:

The alloca hook is in lib\System\Win32\DynamicLibrary.inc all the way at the bottom. You'll see a __MING32__ #ifdef around the definition. You just have to implement those methods and it'll work just fine. Jake On 6/24/07, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for the info, it led to the source of the error I was having. > > I was using

On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:56 PM, gafferuk wrote: > > hi, im creating a music application(image below). > > At the moment im using tcc compiler but im moving across to clang because of > the improved compiler warnings. > Can anyone please explain and show code so I can use clang's JIT to call > functions in my application? You'll probably want to take a look at the

Can someone pease tell me what I am doing wrong? Im trying to register an external function with the JIT, so can call functions in my music application. Here my function int Execute(llvm::Module *Mod, char * const *envp) { llvm::InitializeNativeTarget(); std::string Error; llvm::OwningPtr<llvm::ExecutionEngine> EE( llvm::ExecutionEngine::createJIT(Mod, &Error)); if (!EE) {

Hi, I am trying to do some simple ingress limiting based on fwmark. I know the ability and sense to do INGRESS limiting is ehm... limited ;-) but still I want to try it. I tried several things. === 1 === tcq ingress handle ffff: tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 12mbit burst 10k drop tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 2 fw police rate 10mbit burst 10k drop

I am trying to disassemble some bytecode using llvm-dis: llvm-dis -f -o llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc.ll llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc However, I am getting the following error. llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: 464C457F (Vers=0, Pos=4) How do I go about figuring out what the problem is? llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc is newly compiled using the same version of llvm-gcc as llvm-dis. -- Ryan M. Lefever

Hi I''m completely stuck with the tcng language - I assume there must be some way to arrange queues hierachically like eth1 | TBF | PRIO / \ class class but my attempt (below) produces a "inferno.tc:8: qdisc "tbf" has no classes near "prio"" when run through tcc. dev eth1 { egress { tbf (rate 128kbps, burst 64kb,

Thank you for your help. It generates this script : tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 75000bps ceil \ 75000bps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 125000bps tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u32 \ 0xa000001 0xffffffff at 12 classid 1:1 But I thought it was necessary to

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Scott, > >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> > this is indeed a miscompilation by your system compiler.  However so many >> > compilers miscompiled this that a workaround was committed to svn.  So you >> > may want to check

... is on SourceForge, http://tcng.sourceforge.net/#src Besides a bunch of bug fixes, this release also contains a greatly improved version of the comtc utility that copies comments from the tcng source to tcc''s "tc" output. There are a few infrastructure changes to make comtc work smoothly: - tcc''s -E option is now called -Wexperror or -Wexppostopt, respectively

Hi, I have a question on why gcc and llvm-gcc compile the following simple code snippet differently: extern int a; extern int *b; void foo() { int i; for (i = 1; i < 100; ++i) a += b[i]; } gcc compiles this function hoisting the load of the global variable "b" outside of the loop, while llvm-gcc keeps it inside the loop. This results in slower code on the part of

abrams:~# kinit admin@CORP.TCC.INET This seems to work just fine. abrams:~# net ads join "TwinCities\TTAGS\SERVERS" [2004/12/28 18:52:20, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1475) Warning: ads_set_machine_sd: Unexpected information received Using short domain name -- CORP [2004/12/28 18:52:23, 0] libads/kerberos.c:get_service_ticket(335) get_service_ticket: kerberos_kinit_password

Call for Papers --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IEEE Transaction on Cloud Computing Special Issue on Many-Task Computing in the Cloud http://datasys.cs.iit.edu/events/TCC-MTC15/ ======================================================================================= The Special Issue on Many-Task Computing (MTC) in the Cloud will provide the

Call for Papers --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IEEE Transaction on Cloud Computing Special Issue on Many-Task Computing in the Cloud http://datasys.cs.iit.edu/events/TCC-MTC15/ ======================================================================================= The Special Issue on Many-Task Computing (MTC) in the Cloud will provide the

Report by Eric Lindblad 28-08-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com As of Windows 8.1 MS has discontinued enabling for Interix, so perhaps there is little or no interest in this e-mail's subject matter. NB: As far as possible languages for xapian-bindings I only have be able to compile earlier versions of Tcl with a static library on Interix 3.5, Perl versions fail 'make check',