similar to: [LLVMdev] Question about function arguments

Hi Hemanth, > I was wondering how I could determine the values of function arguments > using the iterators defined in Function.cpp. are you sure you aren't confusing values and names? In something like this int foo(int a, int b) there are names "a" and "b". To make it easier for humans to read LLVM IR, most front-ends will use the same names for the function

Hi Duncan, Thanks for the clarification. My doubt is to know how I can extract the values contained in the arguments from LLVM IR. Thanks, Hemanth On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hemanth, > > > I was wondering how I could determine the values of function arguments > > using the iterators defined in Function.cpp. > >

Hi all, Sorry for the inconvenient about the previous post. The files were not attached. So I put them here again. I am a newbie in LLVM and I am trying to replace the function like: old function || new function ============================== ========= int haha(int a) { int haha(int a, char* ID) { ===> }

On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Please merge the three testcases into one file. We added a new > FileCheck tool which allows you to check for the exact sequence of > instructions expected, which also allows the tests to be merged into > one file. > > +/// MemCpyOpt::pointerIsParameter - returns true iff pointer is a > parameter of > +/// C call

On Sep 2, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hello, > > I fixed my patch as you asked. Sorry for the delay, I'd been working > on my SSU patch (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-August/025347.html > ) > > I hope that everything is fine now. Hey Jakub, Thanks for working on this again, one more round :) Please merge the three testcases into one

Hello, I fixed my patch as you asked. Sorry for the delay, I'd been working on my SSU patch (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-August/025347.html ) I hope that everything is fine now. -Jakub -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr2218-3.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 7511 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hello, Sorry for my stupid mistakes. I hope that everything is fine now. This patch fixes PR2218. There are no loads in example, however "instcombine" changes memcpy() into store/load. Regards, Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr2218-2.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6525 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hi all, I am a newbie in LLVM and I am trying to replace the function like: old function || new function ======================================= int haha(int a) { int haha(int a, char* ID) { ===> } } Of course in the newly replaced function "int haha(int,

On Jul 22, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hello, > > This patch fixes PR2218. Very nice. Are you sure this fixes PR2218? The example there doesn't have any loads in it. > However, I'm not pretty sure that this optimization should be in > MemCpyOpt. I think that GVN is good place as well. Yes, you're right. My long term goal is to merge the relevant

On Jul 25, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for my stupid mistakes. I hope that everything is fine now. > This patch fixes PR2218. There are no loads in example, however > "instcombine" changes memcpy() into store/load. Hi Jakub, Sorry for the delay, I'm way behind on code review. Generally if you respond quickly, I'll remember

ola, ive been looking at adding support for an -msave-args option for use on x86_64. the short explanation of it is that it makes x86_64 function prologues store their register arguments on the stack. the purpose of this is to make the arguments trivially accessible for things like stack traces with arguments. as per https://blogs.oracle.com/sherrym/entry/obtaining_function_arguments_on_amd64,

In n transform I'm writing, when I call arg_size() on a variable argument function similar to printf, it returns 1. However when I call getNumOperands() it returns 0. Isn't an argument a type of operand? If so, shouldn't the number of operands be at least as big as the number of arguments? Ryan -- Ryan M. Lefever [http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~lefever]

First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it doesn't matter here. I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us the link, so that we can download it. The problem is that TheExecutionEngine is set to NULL (maybe because of a previous error), but it will be really better if you use pastebin. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Todd Rovito

I am new to llvm so I might be missing a critical step. My system is Fedora 12 but this also happens in Mac OS X 10.6.2. Here are the steps I used to compile llvm: export TARGETS=x86,x86_64,cpp export INSTALLDIR=/home/rovitotv/llvm ../llvm-2.6/configure --prefix=$INSTALLDIR --enable-bindings=none --enable-targets=$TARGETS --enable-optimized --with-llvmgccdir=$INSTALLDIR

Hi, We are setting up a samba PDC with rhcl 5.I made some restrictions in XP box using GPEDIT like restricting the access to control panel,desktop properties, registry and etc. ,then i copied the DEFAULT USER folder frm that XP box to netlogon share of samba server.(thought it would act as baseprofile for all users and this profile policy will be copied to all new users).But what ever the

I'm now writing a pass and I wanna ask a question about how to duplicate the function and add duplicated arguments in llvm, for example: func(int a, char *b) -> func(int a, char *b, int a1, char *b1) I'm now stuck at using "getOrInsertFunction" and how to handle "getArgumentList", please share your opinion, thanks a lot! James

Ubuntu CDs use multiple configuration files and the include directive as well as gfxboot, so it's useful for gfxboot to support these. Signed-off-by: Colin Watson <cjwatson at ubuntu.com> --- com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c b/com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c

Hello Gang, I am trying to build llvm-2.6 src on Eclipse CDT (Helios) and I was getting some errors in the unittest folder. Anybody here knows how to build the llvm source on Eclipse CDT? Please let me know soon. p.s: I am a newbie to LLVM. I was able to build it on the terminal (on Ubuntu), but I need to use it on Eclipse (like Java projects). -- Cheers, Hemanth -------------- next part

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it > doesn't matter here. I got the compile command from the Kaleidoscope documentation. > I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us > the link, so that we can download it. The

Hello, This patch fixes PR2218. However, I'm not pretty sure that this optimization should be in MemCpyOpt. I think that GVN is good place as well. Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr2218.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6146 bytes Desc: not available URL: