similar to: [LLVMdev] Installing the Library

Hello, When I try to create execution engine I do get "*Interpreter has not been linked in.*" error and EngineBuilder returns NULL. Here is the line I use to create execution engine: auto executionEngine = llvm::EngineBuilder(std::move(m_module)).setErrorStr(&error).create(); Here are all headers I have included: #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" #include

Ok. I figured out. Following methods needs to be called. That fixed the issue. llvm::InitializeNativeTarget(); LLVMInitializeNativeAsmPrinter(); LLVMInitializeNativeAsmParser(); LLVMLinkInMCJIT(); Aaron On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Aaron <acraft at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > When I try to create execution engine I do get "*Interpreter has not been > linked

Hello, I am trying to run this test program via JIT on my Mac (10.7.1) where I have compiled the latest LLVM code for 32-bit and it is not working properly. Running the same code against LLVM 2.9 works fine. I also tried recompiling my same checkout of LLVM as 64-bit and re-compiled my test program and that works fine, for some reason the 32-bit version is yielding unexpected behavior. I believe

I believe the correct way is actually include the Interpreter’s header and the rest is handled automatically. Should be similar for MCJIT Zhang > On 11 May 2018, at 05:21, Aaron via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Ok. I figured out. Following methods needs to be called. That fixed the issue. > > llvm::InitializeNativeTarget(); >

Andy, Yes, it was wrong, as long as RemoteTarget is available for the target. If you would revert it, please consider then; - non-MCJIT stuff - Running different environment on the JIT e.g.) --build=--host=i686-linux --target=x86_64-linux - Host-incapable target on the JIT e.g.) --build=--host=x86_64-linux ---target=i686-mingw32 If JIT is unavailable for the default target, tests

Hi Takumi, I'm a bit confused as to what is supposed to happen in the cross building scenarios. For instance, if host=x86_64-linux and target=i686-mingw32, what should the MCJIT tests do? Should they be suppressed because the architectures don't match? If so, what about the case where host=x86_64-linux and target=x86_64-mingw32? I'm modifying the MCJIT tests so that they will

Heres my full code listing, im totally stuck. // Whistle.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console application. // #include "stdafx.h" #include "clang/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.h" #include "clang/Driver/Compilation.h" #include "clang/Driver/Driver.h" #include "clang/Driver/Tool.h" #include

I am new to llvm so I might be missing a critical step. My system is Fedora 12 but this also happens in Mac OS X 10.6.2. Here are the steps I used to compile llvm: export TARGETS=x86,x86_64,cpp export INSTALLDIR=/home/rovitotv/llvm ../llvm-2.6/configure --prefix=$INSTALLDIR --enable-bindings=none --enable-targets=$TARGETS --enable-optimized --with-llvmgccdir=$INSTALLDIR

First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it doesn't matter here. I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us the link, so that we can download it. The problem is that TheExecutionEngine is set to NULL (maybe because of a previous error), but it will be really better if you use pastebin. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Todd Rovito

2012/9/13 Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>: > I'm a bit confused as to what is supposed to happen in the cross building scenarios. For instance, if host=x86_64-linux and target=i686-mingw32, what should the MCJIT tests do? Should they be suppressed because the architectures don't match? If so, what about the case where host=x86_64-linux and target=x86_64-mingw32?

Hello, So the current JIT will be superseded by the MCJIT completely and no further development should be expected for the current JIT? In any case, I am definitely interested in submitting a patch if you could help me by sending me in the right direction, since I really want this working. I managed to reproduce this behavior in LLVM 3.0 by modifying llc to read my .bc file and try to JIT the

Hello, Maybe my version (LLVM 2.5) is incomplete... now get this error: toy.cpp:11:38: error: llvm/Target/TargetSelect.h: No such file or directory How can I get this file? Regards, Juan Carlos On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > > > FWIW, I'm also suddenly experiencing

Hi, I have a debug build with shared libraries (to reduce compilation time), but since yesterday, it's failing with an ExecutionEngine error: FAILED: : && /usr/lib/ccache/bin/c++ -fPIC -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-comment -std=c++11

On Jun 17, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > FWIW, I'm also suddenly experiencing segfaults in code that used to > work > a few days ago (I'm using svn). This may be unrelated to the problem > described below, but perhaps it's the same thing. > > In my case it seems that creating an ExecutionEngine has changed. I > used > to do > > Module* Mod

> > It just occurred to me... in the case where it's failing, the > ExecutionEngine was trying to JIT a global, and it had never JITted > any functions!  I'll work up a small test case, but I think it's > relevant since the thing is trying to allocate the globals with the > functions. > That was it! The following small test program crashes in getPointerToGlobal:

FWIW, I'm also suddenly experiencing segfaults in code that used to work a few days ago (I'm using svn). This may be unrelated to the problem described below, but perhaps it's the same thing. In my case it seems that creating an ExecutionEngine has changed. I used to do Module* Mod = makeLLVMModule(); // basically create a gcd function verifyModule(*Mod,

Hello, Following the tutorial "Kaleidoscope: Adding JIT and Optimizer Support", I found a Segmentation fault when I try to execute it. I am new in the neighbourhood, so I don't know what is wrong. Could you help me with that? I am working with the last version of LLVM (2.5). The code in chapter 2 and 3 works good, but the code in the chapter 4 did not work. Below are the detail of

Hi all, I'm currently in the process of updating the Kaleidoscope tutorials (first and foremost, the ORC/BuildingAJIT ones), and I've noticed a fair few 404s which are lingering within the current visible documentation. Some of these don't seem to have linked to existing pages for a while. I was wondering if there was a way to set up a check in the buildbot to ensure that

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it > doesn't matter here. I got the compile command from the Kaleidoscope documentation. > I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us > the link, so that we can download it. The

Hi, I want to use a function defined in c(++)-code from code generated by llvm. For this I use ExecutionEngine.addGlobalMapping(). I started with the JIT execution engine and everything worked, then I switched to the interpreter engine and it stopped working, but only if compiled on a Linux system. More precisely it works if I use llvm 3.8.1 + gcc (Linux) + JIT llvm 3.8.0 + mingw-gcc