similar to: [LLVMdev] Relocation issue with jump tables in ELF object files on X86_64

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Smith, Tim <tim at bioware.com> wrote: > (llvm 2.6) > > > > We have an application where we are using LLVM to generate ELF object files > for X86_64.   At runtime we load these objects files into memory using our > own ELF loader. > > > > Everything is working except for the jump tables. > > > > The ELF emitter is

I had this problem a while back and received this response from Jeffrey. FWIW this is fixed in 2.7 by defaulting to CodeModel::Large and using indirect (far) calls. -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Yasskin [mailto:jyasskin at google.com] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 11:32 AM To: Howell, Nathan Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 2.6 JIT using wrong address for

We generating object files, not using the JIT so I don't know if those fixes applies in our case. As far as using PIC goes, the ELFCodeEmitter has asserts to tell you that PIC isn't currently supported. Will have to get the 2.7 update and try it out. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Howell, Nathan [mailto:nhowell at ebay.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:45 PM To: Eli

With the MIPS compiler, when we have static constants, in the .s file we get something like: .type $.str33, at object # @.str33 .section .rodata.str1.1,"aMS", at progbits,1 $.str33: .asciz "//" .size $.str33, 3 Currently when we create direct object code we are referencing the symbol as an offset in .rodata and not directly using

Hi, the attached example works with bfd-ld and with gold, but not with lld: $ cat rodatareloc.s ... .align 16 leaq .JTab(%rip), %r10 jmp *(%r10, %rdx, 8) ... .section .rodata .JTab: .quad .L00, .L01, .L02, .L03, .L04, .L05, .L06, .L07 .quad .L08, .L09, .L10, .L11, .L12, .L13, .L14, .L15, .L16 $ gcc -o rodatareloc.s.o -c rodatareloc.s $ lld -o rodatareloc.so -shared

Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote: >> $ gcc -o rodatareloc.s.o -c rodatareloc.s >> $ lld -o rodatareloc.so -shared rodatareloc.s.o >> >> ld: error: rodatareloc.s.o:(.rodata+0x0): can't create dynamic >> relocation >> R_X86_64_64 against local symbol in readonly segment defined in >> rodatareloc.s.o >> >> >> Changing the section from

I spent some time digging into a Valgrind report of uninitialized values in LLVM r287520 built using itself. (One of quite a few such reports that comes up during a "make check".) I could use another set of eyes on the issue if someone has time. This command gives me an error: valgrind -q ./bin/llc < /home/regehr/llvm/test/CodeGen/Hexagon/hwloop-dbg.ll -march=hexagon

Just want to emphasize that on x86-64 and using Valgrind: LLVM compiled with LLVM gets 360 unexpected test fails LLVM compiled with GCC gets 22 unexpected test fails Of course I don't know how many of these are caused by this bitfield speculation issue. John On 11/21/2016 10:48 PM, regehr via llvm-dev wrote: > Alright, here's what seems to be happening... > > The testcase

How are you modeling weak aliases in Atoms? mach-o does not support weak aliases. My mental model of a weak alias is: If foo is a weak alias for bar, then if nothing else defines bar, use foo in place of bar. -Nick On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: > So I just got lua to link and run and work on x86-64 Linux with musl > and lld. It did require one change to hack

On 2020-09-16 00:18, Fangrui Song wrote: > Usually it is because nobody has noticed the problem or nobody is > motivated enough to fix the problems, not that they intentionally leave > a problem open:) I took some time to look at the problem and conclude > that clang should do nothing on this. Actually, with the clang behavior, > you can discard "Unused" if you use LLD.

So I just got lua to link and run and work on x86-64 Linux with musl and lld. It did require one change to hack around incorrect handling of ELF weak aliases. In musl __stdio_exit.c <http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/stdio/__stdio_exit.c> we have: static FILE *const dummy_file = 0; weak_alias(dummy_file, __stdin_used); weak_alias(dummy_file, __stdout_used); weak_alias(dummy_file,

Hi there, When I compile my code with -fdata-sections and -ffunction-sections, I still see some unused string in my shared library (Android). Actually, the strings appear together inside a .rodata.str1.1 section instead of getting their own section. It seems that the C-string literal are considered differently than other constant and the -fdata-sections is not respected in

I'm trying to add static code generation capabilities to my MCJIT compiler on LLVM 3.4. To that extent I have: targetMachine = engineBuilder.selectTarget(); // ... targetMachine->addPassesToEmitFile(<...>); At first glance this appears to work, but when linking the object file I get the warning: ld: warning: PIE disabled. Absolute addressing (perhaps

Hi, What kind of C/C++ high level code can generate a computed jump, such as: jmpq *%r14 or jmpq *(%r14,%rbx,8) ? I imagine that any calls (including virtual) would use something like 'call *%r14', and the above jumps are mostly from 'switch' statements. Is this correct? Anything else? Thank you, Dan

AFAIK, this won't work: the way I want to use a jump table requires me to get a pointer into the table that I can use as a function pointer to call the original function in a normal call instruction. If I just add a new basic block in some containing function with a call instruction and somehow get a pointer to that instruction, then this does satisfy the goal of putting the new instructions

I would think that the R_X86_64_PC32 relocation type should never be generated with large code model since large code model, by definition, makes no assumptions about the size or address of sections. The use of win32-elf might throw a wrinkle into this, since that is a code path that probably isn't exercised much outside of MCJIT use. That said, when this assertion fails it is usually

Dear R users, the way I understand the documentation of sub() and regexp the following code: sub('[[:digit:]]{1,2}', '', '9ewww') ... should yield: 'ewww' It returns, however: 'www' Why is this the case? My code should just substitute 1 (minimum) or up to 2 (maximum) digits, i.e. numbers and not the 'e' in the string. Do I misinterpret

Hello All, I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. When I try to link this object file with microblaze GCC linker I am getting below errors and debug symbols are missing in it. mb-objdump: DWARF error: found dwarf version '15877', this reader only handles version 2, 3, 4 and 5 information

Hello all I have just purchased NeverWinter Nights Platinum Edition which consists of the original game plus Shadows of Undrentide and Hordes of the Underdark. The installation is at version 1.63 and I have been trying to update to version 1.69 by means of the patches downloaded from nwn.bioware.com. These patch files are about 300 Mb each in size and are called NWNEnglish1.69OrigUpdate.exe

On Saturday, April 18, 2020, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:02 AM Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to >> generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. >>