similar to: [LLVMdev] For clarifying the "<Result>" in Instructions

Hello Reid, Thanks. > Yes, it's an integral part of the Instruction. You can change it by > providing a name when you create the instruction. Following your hint, can I understand in this following way? The name (denoted by "<result>") is actually a referrer to the instruction . Consider this instruction: %this_addr = alloca %struct.String* ;

Yes, it's an integral part of the Instruction. You can change it by providing a name when you create the instruction. Reid On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Xiaolong Tang <xiaolong.snake at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In the language specifications, many instructions have this form: > >  <result> = ... > > So, where is "<result>" defined?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Xiaolong Tang <xiaolong.snake at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Reid, > > Thanks. > >> Yes, it's an integral part of the Instruction.  You can change it by >> providing a name when you create the instruction. > > Following your hint, can I understand in this following way? > > The name (denoted by

Hey, Considering the following instruction: %20 = load %struct.Node** getelementptr inbounds (%struct.Node* @head, i32 0, i32 0), align 16 ; <%struct.Node*> [#uses=1] What is the type of the first operand of the instruction (i.e., getOperand(0))? I thought the operand is a "GetElementPtr" instruction, however, the predicate "isa<Instruction>()" over

Good evening, Tang. > What is the type of the first operand of the instruction (i.e., > getOperand(0))? It might be ConstantExpr. You may use dyn_cast<GEPOperator>(getPointerOperand()). Also GetElementPtrInst* can be casted to GEPOperator. ...Takumi 2010/6/18 Xiaolong Tang <xiaolong.snake at gmail.com>: > > Hey, > > Considering the following instruction: >

Hi all, Considering the limit time I have for an implementation, I better ask for your inputs on a few questions. Any answer is to be much appreciated. First, how does LLVM handle the "new statement" of C++? Could any one give me any hint? Second, what properties does the callgraph generated by LLVM has? One property I am interesting in is whether the callgraph is a safe

Hey all, Just wondering if LLVM has any command options or tool to allow for demangling C++ names from the LLVM bitcode? Thanks! Best, Xiaolong

Hey, LLVM allows to export source level debug information via meta data, I am wondering if there is any mappings between the information in the normal LLVM code and that in the meta data associated with the normal LLVM code. Consider one usage. Given an function parameter (argument) "x", via "getType()" we retrieve the type of "x". The type might be, to some

Hi Renato, > > Just wondering if LLVM has any command options or tool to allow for > > demangling C++ names from the LLVM bitcode? > > c++filt? Do you refer to any particular version of c++filt? I tried, but seemed not to work. For example, when I run a command as below: c++filt _ZNSt4listIiSaIiEEaSERKS1_ The output remains the same as the input symbol. By the way,

On 27 August 2010 18:56, Xiaolong Tang <xiaolong.snake at gmail.com> wrote: > Just wondering if LLVM has any command options or tool to allow for > demangling C++ names from the LLVM bitcode? c++filt? --renato

Guess I have found some clues. Some necessary libraries have to be loaded while trying to generate native code or do interpretation. Then another question emerges: Is there a way to determine the necessary libraries in need? And where to locate these necessary libraries? Xiaolong > Hi All, > > I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for > STL functions, I

Hey, I need to approximate the run-time objects of a program. It is up to the compiler's front-end to make the decision on how to translate the new-expressions in C++, however. This obfuscates the way to figure out dynamically allocated program points in the middle-end (e.g. LLVM). So I am wondering if there is any general way to do so? Does the front-end provide any hint(s) to the

Hey all, My previous work was done mainly in the front-end of conceptgcc, whereas recently I am doing some code analysis in the middle-end of llvm. I am considering to port my previous work to llvm. So, I am very concerned with the difference between gcc and llvm-gcc, and of course the difference between gcc and conceptgcc. I have no idea of the former difference, though I have some idea of

Hi All, I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for STL functions, I undefined "_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE" in c++config.h. In spite of this, after compilation (via clang) and linking (via llvm-ld), the resulting bitcode contains a few declared functions (with no definitions). My question is: In the scenario where some function definitions are missing in a llvm

On Aug 27, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Xiaolong Tang wrote: > Hi Renato, > >>> Just wondering if LLVM has any command options or tool to allow for >>> demangling C++ names from the LLVM bitcode? >> >> c++filt? > > Do you refer to any particular version of c++filt? I tried, but seemed > not to work. For example, when I run a command as below: > >

On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:00 AM, Talin wrote: > Just out of curiosity, why not MurmurHash3 ? This page seems to > suggest that #2 has some flaw, and #3 is better all round: > > https://sites.google.com/site/murmurhash/ > > The main reason is because there's no incremental version of 3. I think that that is a great reason. > LLVM's needs, on the other hand, are fairly

On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Talin wrote: > /// Add a pointer value > template<typename T> > void add(const T *PtrVal) { > addImpl( > reinterpret_cast<const uint32_t *>(&PtrVal), > reinterpret_cast<const uint32_t *>(&PtrVal + 1)); > } > > This violates TBAA rules and looks pretty dangerous to expose as public API.

Hi, I am new to llvm to so please be kind to me if I am asking something that is too simple. I want to get the bounds of an array when I have a handle to getelementptr or insertelement or extractvalue instructions. I am writing a translation routine from llvm to a non-deterministic language and want to include array bounds check in it. The array size gets printed as part of the type of the

Hi folk, I get the following stack trace and do have any clue how to fix the problem. 0 opt 0x087ecc99 1 opt 0x087ed265 2 0xb7f6a400 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 3 opt 0x086d4198 llvm::LeakDetector::addGarbageObject(llvm::Value const*) + 29 4 opt 0x0872945f llvm::Instruction::Instruction(llvm::Type const*, unsigned int,

Xiaolong Tang wrote: > First, how does LLVM handle the "new statement" of C++? Could any one > give me any hint? > It doesn't. Handling C++'s new expression (not statement) is up to the compiler frontend. Clang handles it by emitting a call to the runtime-provided operator new function (which is probably implemented in terms of malloc) followed by a constructor call,