similar to: [LLVMdev] Another bad binutils?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Another bad binutils?"

2010 May 06
0
[LLVMdev] Another bad binutils?
I build llvm+clang almost every day with Ubuntu 10.04. Everything goes fine. I guess it's your VirtualBox has too little memory. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> wrote: > After waiting through about 2 hours of hard drive spinning for Clang to > link under my Xubuntu Lucid Lynx Linux setup on VirtualBox, ld finally just > gave up trying
2010 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Another bad binutils?
Hi Mike-M, Thanks for the help. It seems I'll have to just download the precompiled binaries since I only have 1 Gig in the entire system I'm using. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: mike-m <mikem.llvm at gmail.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 3:36:34 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Another bad binutils? >
2010 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Another bad binutils?
384 MBytes RAM ----- Original Message ---- > From: mike-m <mikem.llvm at gmail.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 3:32:20 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Another bad binutils? > > How much RAM have you allocated to vbox guest? --mike-m On > 2010-05-05, at 4:12 PM, Samuel Crow wrote: > After waiting through >
2010 Jul 04
4
OT: Problems updating OS to deal with fading R support for Ubuntu Hardy Heron...
Evening folks: Not sure where this fits into the picture so bear with me for a few moments while I think out loud to lay out the particulars of my problem. -would love to be employed using R for a living but so far I have just worked with it on my home machine to develop a basic level of skill with it. -I run Ubuntu linux 8.04 LTS on a machine with a 2.5GHz Celeron processor and 1.2GB of memory.
2011 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
----- Original Message ---- > From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>; LLVM Developers Mailing List ><llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:39:57 PM > Subject: Re: Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile > > Samuel Crow <samuraileumas
2011 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
Hello Óscar, This time the autotools version of LLVM trunk build with Clang trunk compiled in Debug+Asserts mode without complaint with --enable-bindings=none. I suspect this makes something fishy looking with the CMake build. Do you need logfiles from configure? Thanks again, --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Samuel Crow
2011 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > This time the autotools version of LLVM trunk build with Clang trunk compiled in > Debug+Asserts mode without complaint with --enable-bindings=none. I suspect > this makes something fishy looking with the CMake build. Do you need logfiles > from configure? I'm clueless about what's happening there. The cyclic
2011 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
Hello Óscar, The single-threaded build failed the same place as the double threaded build failed which is the same place I just indicated in my previous post. The ../llvm/configure script version failed with OCaml building with about 600 assembler errors since I built it in AMD64 mode. (Oops.) Should I disable OCaml from the configure script and try again? Assembler error, input left in
2010 Mar 23
1
[LLVMdev] is there any eclipse plug-in for td/ll files editing?
Hi, I've developed editor prototype for TableGen files (td). It is Eclipse plugin based on IMP project (The IDE Meta-Tooling Platform). Editor has outline, folding, coloring, go to definition, etc. As any prototype, editor has some limitations (e.g. no cross-file indexing). If there is any interest to such tool I will improve it a bit and then publish. Also considering llvm asm (ll) editing
2010 Sep 02
5
Starting Ubuntu 10.04 on XCP
Hello, I’m having difficulty to starting Ubuntu 10.04 virtual machine with XCP 0.5.0. I put 3 files (vmlinuz, initrd.gz, xm-debian.cfg) in the same place under the unpacked ISO tree but when I start the VM, the following error is returned: # xe vm-install template="Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04 (32-bit)" new-name-label=Teste other-config-install-repository=nfs:10.0.0.3:
2011 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > I have attached the logfiles here. I think you didn't set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE while configuring the cmake build. On your build directory, please do: make clean cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug path/to/your/llvm/source/root make If that doesn't work, show the exact command lines you used for invoking cmake and the
2010 Jul 09
1
[LLVMdev] ValueSymbolTable's mutators are private?
Hi Chris, I was thinking that CreateValueName() was the way to add a symbol to a symbol table. Perhaps I'm thinking about this wrong. Here's what I've got: I've got a string generated by the parser which is constant. I need to add it to the symbol table so that, on starting the second pass of my compiler, I can dump all of the string constants to be generated as code. I
2011 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > The single-threaded build failed the same place as the double threaded build > failed which is the same place I just indicated in my previous post. The > ../llvm/configure script version failed with OCaml building with about 600 > assembler errors since I built it in AMD64 mode. (Oops.) Should I disable > OCaml from
2011 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends
Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > Here's some of what it would take to make portable bitcodes in C or LLVM Assembly: A look at the work done on ANDF in the 90's may be helpful. I've only skimmed it but there's been some deep thinking about stuff like this. -Dave
2011 Jul 18
1
[LLVMdev] Fw: RTTI gone in 3.0?
Forgot to CC the list, sorry. ----- Forwarded Message ----- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:40 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RTTI gone in 3.0? > > Hi FlyLanguage, > > I thought LLVM disabled RTTI a long time ago.  It was just too slow. > > --Sam >
2010 Jan 29
3
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format
I don't think I quite understand this... suppose for example you're trying to use an LLVM-based toolchain running on an x86 PC to write code for a device that uses an ARM processor in big endian mode, so you tell the LLVM code generator "generate code for ARM, big endian"... are you saying the optimizer will actually assume the target device is little endian because the
2011 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
[ 73%] Regenerating /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt.tmp [ 73%] Updating /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt if necessary... [ 73%] Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries. find-cycles.pl: Circular dependency between *.a files: find-cycles.pl: libLLVMAsmPrinter.a
2010 May 04
2
R 2.11.0 for Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx on CRAN
Dear Ubunutu R users, Vincent Goulet and myself would like to announce the availability of R 2.11.0 for Ubuntu's latest release, Lucid Lynx. The packages should be on or arriving soon to your favorite mirror. R 2.11.0 packages also exist on CRAN for all Ubuntu releases going back to hardy. As Johannes Ranke pointed out for the Debian release, R packages installed under R < 2.10.0
2011 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] Build problems and workarounds with CMake and XCode
Hello everyone, I finally gave up on trying to build under Eclipse on my Mac because I had a non-functioning installation on there that kept intercepting the command line entries on the path. Uninstalling the old MacPorts install of LLVM 2.6 helped but not completely. I tried making a separate build of LLVM SVN in XCode using build files created with CMake. Surprisingly, it worked better
2011 Jan 05
4
[LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>: > Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: > >> Yeah that's the two different ones I mean. Everything MS (intrinsics, >> language features etc...) is purely version-bound, so I don't even get >> why CMake insists on checking every known function prototype of for >> example "recv"