similar to: [LLVMdev] hazard recognizers for scheduling on x86?

I am working on a target which has some structural hazards. To detect these hazards, I implemented a sub-class of PostRAHazardRecognizer. PostRAHazardRecognizer resets the hazard state on a basic block basis. So, how to detect hazards that may occur between the end of a basic block and the beginning of another basic block ? Thanks ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi, I've developed editor prototype for TableGen files (td). It is Eclipse plugin based on IMP project (The IDE Meta-Tooling Platform). Editor has outline, folding, coloring, go to definition, etc. As any prototype, editor has some limitations (e.g. no cross-file indexing). If there is any interest to such tool I will improve it a bit and then publish. Also considering llvm asm (ll) editing

Hi, Is there anyone else interested in fixed-point arithmetic support in clang/llvm? Regards, Sergey On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Sergey Yakoushkin < sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Were there any further discussion or progress with the fixed point support > (ISO/IEC TR 18037) in the meantime? >

Ooops, you are right. Just forgot to CC the mailing list. Thanks for noticing it,, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison ________________________________________ From: Damien Vincent [damien.llvm at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 3:57 AM To: Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hazard recognizers & basic blocks Merci ! I was also planning to add a second pass to verify these

Hello Sergey, I'd be interested in such a plugin. At one time somebody else started a plugin to cause Eclipse to compile with LLVM-GCC but I hadn't heard anything else from them. I've been just modifying the commands manually for that. I have definitely not heard of a .td or .ll syntax highlighter plugin. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Sergey Yakoushkin

I tried llc with -mcpu=help and it dosn't list Sparc. Thanks. --Gang On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Sergey Yakoushkin < sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Target architecture for llc can be specified using -march, -mcpu, > -mattr options. > > Is it possible to override target CPU attributes when using llvm-gcc > compiler? > > Regards, >

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Sergey Yakoushkin > <sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm building tool-chain for processor without integer MUL. >> So, I've defined __mulsi3 for integer multiplication (int32). >> >> Now I've got a problem with int64

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Sergey Yakoushkin <sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, yes, I'm facing the same issue. > > Hm... seems there are no simple fixes. > I have to do one more i64 mul implementation to workaround aggressive > optimizations. > Is that correct? Is this the only way? This shouldn't be necessary, IMO. If you were going to

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Sergey Yakoushkin <sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm building tool-chain for processor without integer MUL. > So, I've defined __mulsi3 for integer multiplication (int32). > > Now I've got a problem with int64 multiplication which is implemented > in libgcc2.c. > Segfualt due to infinite recursion in i64 soft

Hi, llvm doesn't support -fno-toplevel-reorder option which affects glibc/eglibc for some targets. http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6364 >From conversations with gcc and eglibc maintainers, seems option is highly expected and is not going to deprecate. >> 2010/2/23 Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google.com>: >> If option is going to deprecate in gcc in near future as

Hi David, I'm working on source to source transformations and instrumentation. A flag to disable 'va_arg' lowering in LLVM FEs will be very useful. Have you sent your modifications upstream to LLVM? If not, could you please share link to your public repository. Thanks, Sergey Yakoushkin On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:18 PM, David Meyer <pdox at google.com> wrote: > Neal, >

On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:44, Sergey Yakoushkin <sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com<mailto:sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Kristof, The way we use LNT, we would run different configuration (e.g. -O3 vs -Os) as different "machines" in LNT's model. O2/O3 is indeed bad example. We're also using different machines for Os/O3 - such parameters apply to all

On 2010-02-21 23:36, Sergey Yakoushkin wrote: > Hi, Rafael > > Inlined asm markup inside functions and on the top level is used to > split asm prologue/epilogue parts in very fine-grained manner. > So, splitting source c won't give the same result. You could have 2 files: - 1 which contains the function, and a marker where prolog ends (beginning of file is implicit marker of

I am. Giorgio Il 10/08/2013 12.12, Sergey Yakoushkin ha scritto: > Hi, > > Is there anyone else interested in fixed-point arithmetic support in > clang/llvm? > > Regards, > Sergey > >

On 22 Apr 2016, at 11:14, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com<mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: On Apr 22, 2016, at 12:45 AM, Kristof Beyls via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:44, Sergey Yakoushkin <sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com<mailto:sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com>> wrote: Hi

Hi, I'm working on LLVM based compiler. Editing td, llvm asm files a lot. Is there any plug-in (coloring, open declaration, etc) for Eclipse IDE for these files? If not, is there any interest to such plug-in? Regards, Sergey Y.

I would also be interested in fixed-point arithmetic support in clang/llvm? Is there any movement on this direction since August? Regards, Pedro Malagon -- Pedro Malagon Dpt. Electrical Engineering - Technical University of Madrid Assistant Professor Office B-113 Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid Tel. (+34) 915495700 ext. 4220 @:malagon at die.upm.es On 08/10/2013 09:24 PM, Giorgio

Hi, Target architecture for llc can be specified using -march, -mcpu, -mattr options. Is it possible to override target CPU attributes when using llvm-gcc compiler? Regards, Sergey Y.

I'm building tool-chain for processor without integer MUL. So, I've defined __mulsi3 for integer multiplication (int32). Now I've got a problem with int64 multiplication which is implemented in libgcc2.c. Segfualt due to infinite recursion in i64 soft multiplication (libgcc2, __muldi3). LLVM-GCC (for my target) misoptimizes code if -O2 is passed. It promotes i32 multiplication to

Hi, Are there any existing patches (or instructions) for eglibc(may be glibc/uclibc) to build it correctly with llvm-gcc? Could you please point to them? I'm cross-compiling eglibc for new processor using llvm-gcc. Build passes, but creates mis-optimized crt* files due to lack of -fno-toplevel-reorder support. Seems there are reasons to skip support of this option in llvm.