similar to: [LLVMdev] Cross-compilation for iphone

Hi, I've successfully compiled and cross-compiled llvm 2.6 libraries for many OS and platforms (x86, cell, ppc and arm), but I still have a problem to cross-compile the llvm libraries from Mac 10.5.6 (X86) to iPhone device 3.1.2. I've tryed many ways (CMake, autoconf, XCode 3.2) but i still have a problem for the LLVMXXXCodeGen.a generation, due to a script problem with intrisics.gen.

Hello, I'm trying to use DWARF informations to debug JITed code, but lli crashes when it tries to run any code coming from llvm-gcc or CLANG with the -g and -emit-llvm -c arguments. The target machine is an AMD 64 X2 processor on linux ubuntu 9.04 in x86_64 mode. Lli is generated from the current version of the svn repository. The backtrace and full bt from gdb are enclosed with this

There's an error trying to build a "hello world" project out of the box when selecting LLVM from the list of compilers in iPhone SDK: http://arrelid.com/archive/2009/01/15/xcode-iphone-sdk-llvm-gcc-fixing-what-apple-forgot This is on XCode 3.1.2, iPhone SDK 2.2.1 . The blogger suggests what looks like a hack -- is there a proper solution to this? Is llvm-gcc just missing a header

I can think of many people that use LLVM and maintain out of tree extentions that will likely never be incorporated into mainline. Maintaining out of tree intrnisics takes a fair amount of work and leads to the choice of using a single version of LLVM for a project (and thus have to manually incorporate bug fixes) or risk untimely breakage. I propose that the plugin be extended to allow plugable

Thank very much for this answer, so my last question will be: is it possible to use the LLVM JIT on a PS3 with Yellow Dog 6.2 distribution, instead of the LLVM interpreter, by using the PPE as it seems to be similar to 64-bit PowerPC processors? 2009/12/18 Scott Michel <scooter.phd at gmail.com> > Jerome: > > No, there are no plans to JIT to SPU. That's considerably more

Jerome: No, there are no plans to JIT to SPU. That's considerably more complicated -- you'd have to figure out when to JIT to the SPU and live with all of the constraints that the SPU imposes (data reformatting, r/w DMA, ensure your code lives in 256K unless you can manage to interface with the virtual I-cache work.) Basically, it's not trivial and it doesn't quite fit into the

Hello, I encounter the same problem on MacOSX 10.5.6, either using X11 supplied with Leopard, or X11 2.3.3.2 (XQuartz) and Xcode 3.1.2. It appears using Darwine 1.1.21 from Kronenberg, Darwine 1.1.7 from thisismyinter.net, or the lastest wine-1.1.21, compiled from source. The only way to use wine is to installed wine stable from MacPorts or the Kronenberg's 1.1.21. Hardly, it

Hi all, I'm one of the developers of the Jade project, a Jit decoder running with LLVM 2.9. We are currently testing our decoder on a pandaboard<http://pandaboard.org/> based on an OMAP 4430 and the Jit compilation seems to crash once there is a call to a function in the LLVM IR. We have already tested this issue with lli in its 2.9 version, and this bug still stays the same. LLVM

JonY wrote: > Dave, my toolchain automatically links libssp already, I am using > vanilla sources. Are you doing a native Windows compile with MinGW or cross compiling from Linux? > Why not also check if -lssp is required? If the toolchain has SSP > disabled it should not be passing. Check onces without -lssp and another > time with -lssp if it failed. If we can easily force the

Hi, On my out-of-tree target I have an intrinsic def int_phx_divm_u16 : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], [llvm_i16_ty, llvm_i16_ty], [IntrNoMem]>; that I want to translate to the following instruction during instruction selection: def divm16_pseudo : MyPseudoInst< (outs aNh_0_7:$dst, aNh_0_7:$dst2), (ins

Hi, I'm currently trying to use Speex on the iPhone but have some difficulties to get Speex compiled with XCode. Unfortunately I'm very new to XCode and it would be great if someone could give me a hint what the problem is. Here is what I did in detail: 1. Downloaded the Source Code speex-1.2rc1.tar.gz from www.speex.org 2. Start Xcode 3.1.4 3. File > New Project ... 4. iPhone OS

> On Mar 30, 2016, at 09:33, Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On my out-of-tree target I have an intrinsic > > def int_phx_divm_u16 : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], > [llvm_i16_ty, llvm_i16_ty], > [IntrNoMem]>; > > that I want to translate to the

Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> writes: >> Again, I only skimmed the document, but I was left with the question, >> "why not just make calls to runtime routines?" > > Granted, this is the easiest and cheapest way to support OpenMP... > that throws away the whole notion of "optimizing compilation" and > "front-end / back-end

On 4 May 2015 at 08:37, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad <Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > My worry is regarding the query for cost calculation for specific SAD > instructions such as ‘psad’ (X86) or ‘usad’ (ARM) in Loop Vectorizer. Hi Shahid, The vectorizer's cost model has the ability to return different costs for the same instruction based on the arguments (scalar/vector,

Hi Mon Wang, As I understand it the C++0x memory model will, by default, be similar to Java's in that it will assume sequential consistency, using acquire/release atomics (similar to Java's volatile), for all programs that do not contain data races. Unlike Java in the case when a program contains a data race, the program behavior is undefined. Adopting this model allows many sequential

Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> writes: >> Vector-geps on the other hand are only useful in very specific >> cases. > At the moment, the only cases where I've seen these vectorized in the > current implementation is where some vectorizable integer calculation > was done and then converted into pointers used by GEPs. I am not sure > how common this is in real

Hi, On 03/30/2016 11:15 AM, Matt Arsenault wrote: > >> On Mar 30, 2016, at 09:33, Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On my out-of-tree target I have an intrinsic >> >> def int_phx_divm_u16 : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], >> [llvm_i16_ty, llvm_i16_ty], >>

Hi, I'm compiling LLVM libraries for android platform using android nk r4 from crystax that supports c++ and rtti libs. I'm facing the problem that there gcc compiler doesn't support __clear_cache function of Memory.cpp (line 699) for the librarie LLVMSystem. Is there a way to bypass this limitation without puts a comment on this line? Regards Jérôme Gorin -------------- next part

Hi Renato, Thanks for your response. My concern was actually this. For example, take vector type V8i16 on X86 target With llvm.sad() intrinsic: VC1 (Vector Cost) = Cost associated with "PSAD" instruction. W/ llvm.absd() and llvm.hadd() VC2 = Cost associated with "absolute diff" + "horizontal add" ( ??? ) As I will be querying with getIntrinsicCost(ID) for these

Hello, I am completely new to Speex and make files but I'm looking to build/ run Speex on the iPhone for decoding and potentially encoding. I've read that you can just copy the source into an XCode project which I tried but I started getting all kinds of compile errors. (1000+) There were things like missing references to ogg header files and so forth. Could someone explain