similar to: [LLVMdev] help for clang

i don't understand the source code : static StringMapEntryBase *getTombstoneVal() { return (StringMapEntryBase*)-1; } at "include\llvm\adt\stingmaph" at line 116. "(StringMapEntryBase*)-1" is it the cast or something other? why there is a * after class StringMapEntryBase? thank you ~~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes: > I think there are two main problems here: > 1. People use trunk on side-projects because releases mean very little > in LLVM world > 2. We start adding new stuff as soon as a release is branched, and > that reduces warnings up to a few days > > We're all talking about problem 2, when in fact, I think the problem

On 6 November 2013 11:02, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Except that there hasn't been warning at all. The only "warning" is > that "we're going to upgrade to some new toolchain." We need to know > *exactly* which toolchain that is so we can test all of our software > against it. "4.7.x" doesn't help because every point release has new

Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> writes: > 1) Switch trunk to C++11 at time T. People whose toolchains aren't > ready stop integrating from LLVM trunk until they are ready. > 2) Switch trunk to C++11 at time T + an extra month. Again, people > whose toolchains aren't ready stop integrating from LLVM trunk until > they are ready. This flies completely in the

Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> writes: > I'm objecting to 1 month for svn trunk - 2 months notice is even > pushing it imho. > > 1) This is imho not the small change which it's being presented as > 2) As someone else stated - there are projects tracking svn trunk > and telling them to just stop doing that and follow the previous

Gene, it looks like the syslinux master branch is broken since February [1]. Peter created the wip.makefixes branch but I wasn't able to get it working (yet) and it lacks activity since March. I think it might be time to revert commit 458a54133ecd ("Fix all warnings, and better separate code that should not be mixed") which broke master. Then apply at least the outstanding patch

Hi everyone. I'm fairly new to the world of Vorbis, but after hearing the sound comparisons I was sold. I've recently begun a massive undertaking of ripping all my CD's to hard disk in preparation for the home theater PC that I'm in the process of building. I am a couple of hundred CD's into this and I came across one small problem, I can't find any CD burning software

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > > > The overwhelming majority of contributors and users of trunk seem to > > be fine with this, so while I'm interested in anything we can do to > > make it easier for you, unless we see significantly more concerns > > about this plan, I

>>"Never use a browser for email." I don't agree. In fact, using a browser for email or atleast initial setup, is actually more secure. This because SMTP/IMAP clients normally don't support 2FA, so you would have to "hack" a solution to enable 2FA for email. This can be made in 2 ways: Either, you have a full fledged email setup. Whats important, is, to prevent

hpa wrote: > On July 7, 2019 8:37:10 AM PDT, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt at gmx.de> > wrote: > >Gene, > > > >it looks like the syslinux master branch is broken since February > >[1]. Peter created the wip.makefixes branch but I wasn't able to get > >it working (yet) and it lacks activity since March. > > > >I think it might be time to revert

Dear R users, I want to share my joy with you. Please see the following excellent introduction to R "Statistiques avec R " by Vincent Zoonekynd http://zoonek2.free.fr/UNIX/48_R/all.html In paticular, you can see a lot of fascinating graphics examples of R from which you can get many hints. Soryy if this is already well-known, but the CRAN search did not show nothing with the keyword

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:11 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > On 10/30/13 03:17 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com<mailto: >> cbergstrom at pathscale.**com <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>>> wrote: >> >> On 10/29/13 07:27 AM,

hi,i am new here,and i want to know what should i do first if i want to develop a compiler based on llvm? thank you very much! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091118/9af309cc/attachment.html>

On 6 November 2013 10:15, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > No. We need to know which version of the tools to test. As far as I > know, a specific version (point release) hasn't been chosen yet. > > A toolchain upgrade is a *major* issue for large software projects. I'm > all for C++-11. It's long past due that we use it in LLVM. However, > prudence dictates that

On 2 March 2016 at 19:01, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote: > Also, just a quick question. I’m happy to continue to talk about the actual > design and implementation of LLVM IR on this point, and I’d be happy to > put out the actual patch we’re initially proposing. Obviously, all of this code > needs to go through the normal LLVM/Clang code review processes. But >

Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> writes: >>> If the new feature requires out-of-tree LLVM users to upgrade their >>> toolchains then we may only be giving them a month or less warning, >>> even if we are giving downstream packagers 6 months. >> >> Correct. That's not enough warning. > > If we decide to delay this yet again

On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:28 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Mar 20, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Paul J. Lucas wrote: > >> I've read the docs on LLVM exceptions, but I don't see any examples. A little help? > > I don't think this has anything to do with LLVM's IR-level exception system. It sounds to me like you just need a way to handle C++ exceptions inside of the C++ code

On 10/30/13 03:17 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com <mailto:cbergstrom at pathscale.com>> wrote: > > On 10/29/13 07:27 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com

On Mar 20, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Paul J. Lucas wrote: > To recap, on Mar 14, 2012, I wrote: > >> My project has a C++ library that I want to allow the user to use via some programming language to be JIT'd to call functions in said library. For the sake of simplicity, assume the library has classes like: >> >> class item_iterator { >> public: >> virtual

Hi, All I have set up a samba enviroment on a ubuntu server. I can see it using "smbclient -L localhost". But now I want to access the samba server using a Windows PC, and they are not in LAN. I cannot access the server using \\server_ip <file://server_ip/>. Someone suggested using SSH, but I don't know what to do in detail. Any help will be gratefully