similar to: [LLVMdev] Does LLVM have the pass that do loop dependence analysis ?

Hi, I am using LLVM for implementing LoopFission pass. I am using LoopPass. I know that for checking circular dependency in loop I have to use LoopDependenceAnalysis This is what i want to do. for(int i = 0; i< n ; i++){ s1 : a[i] = a[i] + x[i]; s2 : x[i] = x[i+1] + i*2 ; } /**there is no dependence from s2 to s1/ so after distribution(it

Hi all, I've sent it as a reply to another thread, but it was ill placed. Anyway, sorry about the duplication, but here it goes. I've been looking into the loop passes and noticed we do alias analysis and scalar evolution only, trying to clean up the loop as far as possible. I suppose that, if we were to define SCCs, split them into groups and re-arranging into multiple loops, we would

Shanmuhka wrote: > I looked at the sanjoys patch for SIV Test. And i figured out that this is exactly what i need. > as the comments said, check if subscript A can possibly have the same value as B in analyseSIV(A,B) > but i didn't get How to use this information ? > > lets just say in the above program > When i use depends function it shows the dependency from load of x to

Forward to llvmdev ---------- 转发的邮件 ---------- 发件人："Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com> 日期：2013年10月22日 下午7:33 主题：Re: [lldb-dev] Has Fast register allocation been finished in 3.3 version? 收件人： <wansheg at gmail.com> 抄送： <lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu> On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:43 PM, wansheg at gmail.com wrote: When I use llc command with --regalloc=fast , get error In

sorry ! I have re-corrected the title. ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Sheng Wang"<wansheg at gmail.com>; 发送时间: 2009年9月4日(星期五) 下午3:23 收件人: "LLVMdev"<LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>; 主题: [LLVMdev] Dose I need to build llvm-gcc front-end from sourceresolve this error? /* mm.cpp */ #include<iostream> using namespace std; struct xx{ int x;

You posted to xen-ia64-devel & xen-ia64 (deleted the wrong word?) rather than xen-devel so I added that to the CC. On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:38 +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On IA64 alloc_bootmem_low() can''t be called this early. > > Before alloc_bootmem_low() can be called init_bootmem(), which is called in > find_memory(). However xen_machine_kexec_setup_resources() is

This question is more towards understanding how things work rather than trying to just get something to work. I have something like this in my user model. def full_name first_name + " " + last_name end This works find if I use it for display values in a collection_for_select. options_from_collection_for_select( @users, :id, :full_name) It displays the full name in the

Hello there! I'm intending to port LLVM old JIT API for PPC64le once I wiil need this support in one of my applications. Would a port of this old piece of code be merged on LLVM 3.5, even though it is on the verge of obsoleteness? Thank you! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Good day I'm on the verge of starting a Data and Analytics company. We'll start small with a few systems running?CentOS?Linux ?and developing our software using python. However, we still?haven't decided on a name for the business. Please go to the following link to help me choose a most appropriate name out of a choice of six: https://docs.google.com/forms/

after spending a lot of time integrating X-Fixer's winamp2 plugin code, I am on the verge of removing id3 v1/v2 support from the plugins completely. it is really hard to get right in a way that works intuitively for the user, and i18n is also a nightmare. in id3v2 every field can have a different encoding. FLAC tag a.k.a. Vorbis comment support is very good now so unless someone comes up

Add a new constant ETH_P_802_3_MIN, the minimum ethernet type for an 802.3 frame. Frames with a lower value in the ethernet type field are Ethernet II. Also update all the users of this value that David Miller and I could find to use the new constant. Also correct a bug in util.c. The comparison with ETH_P_802_3_MIN should be >= not >. As suggested by Jesse Gross. Compile tested only.

3.5 was already released, and we only merge bug fixes to release branches. Caio, do you really need it on 3.5 specifically or are you just asking if folks are interested to get it into the trunk? - Hans On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > +Hans > > Caio, even if this patch does not go into 3.5, maybe you'd like to post it > on

Hi, I'm new for llvm . when I build the llvm sample project , find the autoconf version 2.5 is required . Is that necessary ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090903/661de771/attachment.html>

can you give a detail description about the target architecture? ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "XU Xinfeng"<xu.xinfeng at gatech.edu>; Date: 2009年9月15日(星期二) 上午7:34 To: "llvmdev"<llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>; Subject: [LLVMdev] Dear LLVM, Dear LLVM, Now, I have to design special complier for my own multicore microprocessor with cusomized

Hello llvmers: I'm study Fast register allocation in codegen. I get confused with isKill flag in MachineOperand. I thin "isKill" flag the last Use Reference. But, Fast Register doesn't require LiveVariable Analysis which will mark isKill Flag for global virtual Register. So during Fast RegisterAllocation, Faster Register Allocation procedure can't determine

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > > I believe that would be a FunctionPass and registered in the > LoopDependencyAnalysis "runOnLoop()", so it can run when such pass is > called by the PassManager. Or should it be a completely separate pass > (VectorizationPass?) so we can control it from a separate command-line >

I am being barraged with Ruby, Rails and Rich Internet application work right now. Almost enough that I could quit the day job and make a go of it, forgetting about Java altogether. Places in the greater Miami area are turning on to Rails and Ruby -- much of it fueled by the stronger voices in the local Java community. Am I alone in this, or do many of you see absolutely explosive growth in Ruby,

Hello, Erwin > Although most of this is plain portable C++ perhaps LLVM can auto-vectorize > some of this? Well, I doubt so, unfortunately - LLVM does not have any autopar these days > There is a little bit of hand optimized x86 SSE code. This is only enabled > on 32bit Windows and Mac OSX Intel builds. Ok. What's about Linux builds? Are there any other implementations e.g.

Ashhar Farhan wrote: > > dear Anders, > > the speex encoder really does not know when you are ending a wave file. > most probably there is a one-off error in your loop that reads the wave > file and you are incorrectly reading the end of the wave file. Hmmm, I am using code ripped verbatim from speexenc. Are there any known bugs of this kind in that? > btw, it will be

Hi Ole, On 10/21/2015 02:38 PM, Ole Traupe wrote: > MJ, thanks a lot! Just to make sure I get you right: > > This section is in the smb.conf. > a) on the DC acting as file sever as well, or > b) on a separate file server running Samba 4.1.17? on a separate fileserver. DC's are 4.2.4, fileserver 4.1.17. > The user log-on happens on a third machine, that is neither DC nor