similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 testing ends today

On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Just a reminder that today is the last day for pre-release2 testing. > Hi Tanya, Attached are the log files for Mac OS X 10.5.8 on PowerPC. There are these failures for clang: ******************** Failing Tests (20): /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/ always_inline.c

This is just a reminder that the pre-release2 testing will end on Feb. 28th (end of the day). So please send me your results by then. Thanks! -Tanya

On Jan 15, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Matthieu Monrocq wrote: > Hello Doug, > > *putting llvmdev in copy since they are concerned too* > > I've finally got around to finish a working implementation of the typical Levenshtein Distance with the diagonal optimization. > > I've tested it against the original llvm implementation and checked it on a set of ~18k by randomly

> 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. Excellent! Would you care to update the "LLVM 2.6 release schedule" on the front page of the web site? Thanks, Jay.

Hello Doug, *putting llvmdev in copy since they are concerned too* I've finally got around to finish a working implementation of the typical Levenshtein Distance with the diagonal optimization. I've tested it against the original llvm implementation and checked it on a set of ~18k by randomly generating a variation of each word and checking that both implementations would return the

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Aaron Gray < > aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>wrote: >> >>> LLVMers, >>> >>> The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available

Is there are chance to get http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5081 fixed in 2.6? The affected application did compile with with LLVM 2.5. I haven't yet checked whether TOT fixed this already, however, but will do this if necessary. Thanks, Torvald On Saturday 17 October 2009 20:51:05 Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.

Hi Tanya, the gcc testsuite doesn't seem to be present in llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source. I don't think removing it is a good idea. I noticed this when I wanted to check that the release passes the Ada checks. Ciao, Duncan.

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Actually its [configure-stage3-intl] where its hanging. > > This can easily be due to inline FP math in the stdlib headers. For example > - I had to maintain slightly hacked mingw32 headers which do not contain > inline FP assembler, otherwise at least libstdc++ configure would

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use

> > Actually its [configure-stage3-intl] where its hanging. This can easily be due to inline FP math in the stdlib headers. For example - I had to maintain slightly hacked mingw32 headers which do not contain inline FP assembler, otherwise at least libstdc++ configure would hang. No idea about cygwin though. --- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > >> LLVMers, >> >> The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ >> >> If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help

Hi Tanya, glad to see that 2.6 release is coming. :) After doing some testing with valgrind on this release, I have find a little "undefined memory" error in DefaultJITMemoryManager related to the PoisonMemory field. This bug has been corrected in trunk with revision r80192. Attached is a patch which cleanly apply same correction on the release-2.6 branch. Thanks, Olivier. On Sat,

The 2.7 pre-release2 is available for testing: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.7/pre-release2/ Please complete all testing by April 23rd EOD. We are shortening this testing period a bit to get the release out soon since its been delayed so far. The release team has done our qualifications and we think its of high quality and ready to go. As this is the last pre-release, we only accept fixes for

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run

> To test clang: > 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile' llvm[2]: Compiling BasicBlockTracing.c for Release build (PIC) llvm[2]: Compiling BlockProfiling.c for Release build (PIC) llvm[2]:

2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > >>> To test clang: >>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. >> >> LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: >> > > Does TOT build? If not, please file a bug. No. Theres the runtime install bug (below), and llvm-gcc has a bug that I

On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >> To test clang: >> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. > > LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: > Does TOT build? If not, please file a bug. Unfortunately Cygwin is not in our release criteria. I'd like to have a buildbot running (if there is not one already) and then get someone to qualify it for the

2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> 2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >>> >>>>> To test clang: >>>>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. >>>> >>>> LLVM