LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the report.nightly.txt 4) Please provide details on what platform you compiled LLVM on, how you built LLMV (src == obj, or src != obj), gcc version, and if you compiled llvm-gcc with support for fortran. The more details, the better. Please COMPLETE ALL TESTING BY end of the day on Feb. 28th! We hope to have the final release out on 3/2/2009 (assuming no new regressions). Thanks, Tanya Lattner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090220/0becc548/attachment.html>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote:> LLVMers, > > The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use > llvm-gcc binary *(please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).* > 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log > 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the report.nightly.txt > 4) Please provide details on what platform you compiled LLVM on, how you > built LLMV (src == obj, or src != obj), gcc version, and if you compiled > llvm-gcc with support for fortran. The more details, the better. >Cygwin with GCC 3.4.4 is failing llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 with :- cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-variadic-macros" Is anyone testing Cygwin with GCC 4.2 or 4.4 ? Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090221/ee1692a8/attachment.html>
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > >> LLVMers, >> >> The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ >> >> If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. >> Please do the following: >> >> 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use >> llvm-gcc binary *(please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).* >> 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log >> 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the report.nightly.txt >> 4) Please provide details on what platform you compiled LLVM on, how you >> built LLMV (src == obj, or src != obj), gcc version, and if you compiled >> llvm-gcc with support for fortran. The more details, the better. >> > > > Cygwin with GCC 3.4.4 is failing llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 with :- > > cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-variadic-macros" > > Is anyone testing Cygwin with GCC 4.2 or 4.4 ? >I hacked "-Wno-variadic-macros" bug but llvm-gcc is hanging on GCC 3.4.4 Cygwin later on first bootstrap pass in configure when "checking executable suffix", presumably this is the first self call. On the face of it, it looks like it may be a tough one to debug, dont know if GCC 3.4.4 Cygwin will make it to 2.5 release. I'll try with GCC 4.2 on Cygwin tommorow, unless anyone else is covering it. Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090222/671c1e5a/attachment.html>
Hi Tanya, the gcc testsuite doesn't seem to be present in llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source. I don't think removing it is a good idea. I noticed this when I wanted to check that the release passes the Ada checks. Ciao, Duncan.
On Feb 22, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:> Hi Tanya, the gcc testsuite doesn't seem to be present > in llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source. I don't think removing it > is a good idea. I noticed this when I wanted to check > that the release passes the Ada checks. >Its been removed from the final release for many releases now. I personally don't care but was told to do this. I'll check with Chris when he gets back. -Tanya> Ciao, > > Duncan.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote:> LLVMers, > > The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use > llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).Unclear which of the many tarballs you mean, so I chose the smallest :-)> 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log$ gmake check llvm[0]: Running test suite gmake[1]: Entering directory `/disk1.1/usr/home/ben/software/unpacked/llvm-2.5/test' Making a new site.exp file... *** dejagnu not found. Make sure 'runtest' is in your PATH, then reconfigure LLVM. gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/disk1.1/usr/home/ben/software/unpacked/llvm-2.5/test' This is on FreeBSD. I have no idea what "runtest" is?> 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the report.nightly.txt > 4) Please provide details on what platform you compiled LLVM on, how you > built LLMV (src == obj, or src != obj), gcc version, and if you compiled > llvm-gcc with support for fortran. The more details, the better. > > Please COMPLETE ALL TESTING BY end of the day on Feb. 28th! > We hope to have the final release out on 3/2/2009 (assuming no new > regressions). > Thanks, > Tanya Lattner > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >
On 2009-02-24 17:49, Ben Laurie wrote:> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > >> LLVMers, >> >> The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ >> >> If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. >> Please do the following: >> >> 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use >> llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). >> > > Unclear which of the many tarballs you mean, so I chose the smallest :-) > > >> 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log >> > > $ gmake check > llvm[0]: Running test suite > gmake[1]: Entering directory > `/disk1.1/usr/home/ben/software/unpacked/llvm-2.5/test' > Making a new site.exp file... > *** dejagnu not found. Make sure 'runtest' is in your PATH, then > reconfigure LLVM. > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/disk1.1/usr/home/ben/software/unpacked/llvm-2.5/test' > > This is on FreeBSD. I have no idea what "runtest" is? >It is dejagnu. Install it. Best regards, --Edwin
>> The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ >> >> If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. >> Please do the following: >> >> 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use >> llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). > > Unclear which of the many tarballs you mean, so I chose the smallest :-)You should get llvm, llvm-test, and either a binary (for your platform) or source of llvm-gcc. -Tanya> >> 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log > > $ gmake check > llvm[0]: Running test suite > gmake[1]: Entering directory > `/disk1.1/usr/home/ben/software/unpacked/llvm-2.5/test' > Making a new site.exp file... > *** dejagnu not found. Make sure 'runtest' is in your PATH, then > reconfigure LLVM. > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/disk1.1/usr/home/ben/software/unpacked/llvm-2.5/test' > > This is on FreeBSD. I have no idea what "runtest" is? > >> 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the report.nightly.txt >> 4) Please provide details on what platform you compiled LLVM on, how you >> built LLMV (src == obj, or src != obj), gcc version, and if you compiled >> llvm-gcc with support for fortran. The more details, the better. >> >> Please COMPLETE ALL TESTING BY end of the day on Feb. 28th! >> We hope to have the final release out on 3/2/2009 (assuming no new >> regressions). >> Thanks, >> Tanya Lattner >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >