similar to: [LLVMdev] Call For Buildbot Machines

Hi all, Our buildbot at: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/ has been upgraded (it is also now linked from the front page). It has a number of handy new features: 1. I imported the 'console' view used by Chromium into our version of buildbot. You can see it here: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/console This is experimental, but it seems to work well and once you learn to read it it is

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: > These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? > It builds fine on my x86 linux box. Why don't the URLs work for you? In this case the problem was just because llvm.org went down. When an "svn" step fails; i.e., the line after "BUILD FAILED:", the problem is usually

These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? It builds fine on my x86 linux box. -----Original Message----- From: buildbot at google1.osuosl.org [mailto:buildbot at google1.osuosl.org] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:12 PM To: Sanjiv Kumar Gupta - I00171 Cc: llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux The Buildbot has detected a new

> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-maverick-x86 on > Network UPS Tools. > Full details are available at: > http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Ubuntu-maverick-x86/builds/32 > > Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/ > > Buildslave for this Build: cayenne Fred, I had a few spare cycles and tried building

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> > Note that as far as places to put temporary files, the right place to >> > put >> > them is

Hi Daniel, I'm an interested student in that idea I enjoy building web apps and I have good experience. I've worked with PHP, Javascript (Jquery, Dojo, ...), Java (JSF, Struts, ...), and some databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, ...) ... for more than 7 years. I graduated in 2005 and this year I've started doing Masters. For this year I have to study LLVM because it can be part of my thesis

Hello LLVMers (in particular, LLVMers interested in GSoC), Since people seem interested in GSoC project ideas, here is one that might not be totally obvious -- work on LLVM's testing infrastructure! :) I have been working hard on modernizing our nightly test performance monitoring software, but there is a lot more work to be done. As LLVM developers, we rely on this software for tracking

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > Note that as far as places to put temporary files, the right place to put > > them is alongside the other test outputs in the test output "sandbox" > > directory. > > > > Somewhat

On Aug 7, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:18 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: >> These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? >> It builds fine on my x86 linux box. > > Why don't the URLs work for you? > I suspect the corporate firewall is blocking outgoing connections on port 8011. -jim > In

On 07/23/2009 10:39 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Douglas Gregor<dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >> On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: >> >>> Greetings >>> >>> Im interested to setup an automated buildbod that can test the cmake >>> buildsysten. >>> I use cmake for ARM cross compilation so I

I actually tend to agree with spop, it's cleaner to compute things at runtime than at compile time. One particular reason is wanting to pick the best target CPU for the current arch (which may not be what was compiled for). The current JIT target selection logic is really gross, I do believe that it tried to do this, but it probably needs some spring cleaning. Sebastian, can you try and take

2009/7/16 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > I plan to check my buildbot configuration "stuff" into the > llvm-project repository soon. I have to refactor things a bit to > support use by other people, but currently I have configurations for > llvm, clang, and llvm-gcc in various target / self-hosting > permutations. I also have a regular buildbot driver

I thought it was already fixed, so no. I hate to say this, but can you try first: touch $LLVM_SRC_ROOT/LLVMBuild.txt and a make? If that doesn't work, try a make clean? I'll try and find a real fix tomorrow. - Daniel On Dec 12, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I'm hitting this. Is there ETA for the fix? > > Evan > > On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Daniel

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Douglas Gregor<dgregor at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > >> Greetings >> >> Im interested to setup an automated buildbod that can test the cmake >> buildsysten. >> I use cmake for ARM cross compilation so I would be interested if >> someone are running a cmake bot and if

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 22 April 2013 18:02, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > >> Ok, so we are already downloading from a private server (lab.llvm.org), >> which IMHO we should be doing because we want tight control over the >> dependencies etc. >> > > Agreed. > > >

LLVMers, The 2.6 code freeze is this friday, August 21, at 9pm PDT. All major changes should be checked into SVN at this time. Please monitor the buildbots closely for any failures. I ask you to be very cautious with what you commit to svn over the next few days. This is not the time to be adding experimental code :) Please help us keep LLVM as stable as possible over the next few days.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, David Greene<dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:43, Török Edwin wrote: > >> How about starting simple, and just auto-tagging builds that work? >> Could be done per OS/arch, and one global tag when all buildbots pass. > > We've talked about this before and I've been working on setting up > such a system.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Nick Lewycky<nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > 2009/7/15 Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> >> >> On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:48 PMPDT, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> > That depends on what you call a false positive. The public buildbot >> > regularly fails because of mailing Frontend tests, and I have had >> >

Good day Tanya, I would just like to clarify this for myself and a few other people who maybe wondering, Does this code freeze apply to; * Clang. * Compiler-RT. Thanks for your time, Best Regards, Edward O'Callaghan. 2009/8/17 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: > LLVMers, > > The 2.6 code freeze is this friday, August 21, at 9pm PDT. > > All major changes should

Hi Tanya, Bill, Anton and Martin. I have recently set-up and installed a ARM buildbot that have currently been building since August 21. You can follow its progress here http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux I have also started to investigate the test failures and writing bugreports. Currently about all test failures except are related to the ExecutionEngine JIT and i am doing