similar to: [LLVMdev] Replace gcc with llvm-gcc???

I truly get the bytecode file for each souce file,but can I use llvm-link to link them into a whole-program one automatically through some scripts? > > Message: 27 > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:16:10 +0200 > From: ?scar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Replace gcc with llvm-gcc??? > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Message-ID: <87vdjlnh2d.fsf at

Just set llvm-ld as the default ld . Such as LD = llvm-ld in makefile, if it's not working, then there is no solution 2009/9/15, zhunan <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>: > I truly get the bytecode file for each souce file,but can I use > llvm-link to link them into a whole-program one automatically through > some scripts? > > >> >> Message: 27 >> Date: Tue, 15

罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > Just set llvm-ld as the default ld . > Such as LD = llvm-ld in makefile, if it's not working, then there is no solution > Some Makefiles use the C compiler (e.g., gcc or llvm-gcc) as the linker. For such Makefiles, the above will not work because llvm-gcc runs ld. What you need is a linker that can link LLVM bitcode files together. If that is the case,

Thank you for the reply,but I meant that when we building,we can not use the native tools such ar and as to process the llvm files,we must have the ability to call llvm-ar and llvm-as instead of the native ones. 在 2009-10-17六的 19:35 -0700，Nick Lewycky写道： > zhunan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't think just use gold-plugin even modified is enough for the task > > of

Yes,but when I just simply replace lto_codegen_compile(cg, ...) with lto_codegen_write_merged_modules(cg, "/path/to/output.bc") in the gold-plugin.cpp to see if it will generate a correct bc file,the llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ will call the native ld in the linking step,which causes the failture because of that ld can not recognize an object file which contains LLVM's IL. I understand the

2009/9/18 zhunan <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>: > Yes,but ubuntu's directory structure is not exactly the same as the > classic linux distribute, > > I put libLLVMgold.so in /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.4 where cc1 is > also in. > > Strange situation,is it a bug for llvm-gcc???? Could be. Are you comfortable using gdb? Last time I looked it was working for me.

2009/10/17 zhunan <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>: > Thank you for the reply,but I meant that when we building,we can not use > the native tools such ar and as to process the llvm files,we must have > the ability to call llvm-ar and llvm-as instead of the native ones. We can use the native tools if they understand llvm IL :-) That is what the plugin does. With it installed you can run

2009/10/19 zhunan <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>: > Yes,but when I just simply replace lto_codegen_compile(cg, ...) with > lto_codegen_write_merged_modules(cg, "/path/to/output.bc") in the > gold-plugin.cpp to see if it will generate a correct bc file,the > llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ will call the native ld in the linking step,which > causes the failture because of that ld can not

Hi,all Where may I find the binary encode of llvm's ISA? I would like to load the instructions from llvm bitcode file and translate it to another kind of ISA dinamically,but I searched all docs in llvm.org,nothing has been found ,can anyone help me? zhunan 2009.7.1

Yes,but ubuntu's directory structure is not exactly the same as the classic linux distribute, I put libLLVMgold.so in /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.4 where cc1 is also in. Strange situation,is it a bug for llvm-gcc???? 在 2009-09-18五的 12:58 +0300，Török Edwin写道： > On 2009-09-18 03:06, Nan Zhu wrote: > > OMG,that's just my situation... > > > > I can link with

Hi,all Recently,I write some code to implement the following funtions: I make use the codes of "llvm-dis" to disassemble the bitcode file and do some change on it,after that ,"my llvm-as" assembles the changed file to generate a bitcode file. But I got a "corrupted double-linked list" error when "my llvm-as" works,however,when I do nothing on the

Sorry for forgetting to reply all... It works! Thank you very much! But I also wonder how do you know this function will work while there are no documents noticing that. I try learning LLVM by reading its code, but soon feel lost in so many functions. Just like I have many tools, but don't know which to use and what difference it could make. Is there some better ways to learn LLVM? On Wed,

Hi everyone, I want to achieve the following setup: - have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users; - have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user. This is running on debian lenny, samba 3.2.5. My smb.conf is as follows: [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = cast remote announce = 192.168.1.99/WORKGROUP server string = %h

Dear R listers, I posted this problem several days ago but it seems nobody answered. I use nlm to optimize a given function ,but it always generates the following warnings " Error in nlm(foo, theta.start) : non-finite value supplied by 'nlm' " I don't know why ,can anybody give me some hints ?? thanks in advance. regards .

On May 7, 2013, at 8:26 PM, zhiyuan yang <sjtu.yzy at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing a loop pass to replace the backedge with an edge from latch to exit. > Now I just replace the terminator of latch with another BranchInst, and the loop will not be a loop after my pass. However, it turns out a failure of loopverify after executing my pass: > > opt:

Dear All, I have both R 2.80 and Scientific Workplace 5.5 installed on my computer. I copied the following commands from HTML help provided by R: testfile <- system.file("Sweave", "Sweave-test-1.Rnw", package = "utils") Sweave(testfile) I then compile Sweave-test-1.tex file using Scientific Workplace 5.5. Apparently, Scienfic Workplace 5.5 does not recognize

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Well, it seems like my gnome terminal can't interpret Korean translations very well. Or maybe it can and I don't know how to confirm it ? I tried the following encoding characters in the gnome terminal: Current Local (UTF-8) Korean (EUC-KR) Korean (UHC) Korean (JOHAB) and all I can see are question marks inside black rhombus. That

Laine, you are right, some packages mixed: [root@openstack3 ~]# rpm -qa | grep '\(libvirt\|netcf\|libnl\)' | sort libnl-1.1.4-3.el7.x86_64 libnl3-3.2.21-7.el6.x86_64 libnl3-cli-3.2.21-7.el6.x86_64 libnl3-debuginfo-3.2.21-7.el6.x86_64 libnl-debuginfo-1.1.4-3.el7.x86_64 libnl-devel-1.1.4-3.el7.x86_64 libvirt-client-1.1.1-29.el7_0.3.x86_64 libvirt-daemon-1.1.1-29.el7_0.3.x86_64

zhunan wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think just use gold-plugin even modified is enough for the task > of building a whole-program bc file. > > When we want to build a whole-program bc file by a general solution(I > meant that we can use such a method for all kinds of build system),we > need not only a gold-plugin to do what llvm-ld does,but also some > mechanisms,not a

On 2009-09-19 03:28, zhunan wrote: > Yes,but ubuntu's directory structure is not exactly the same as the > classic linux distribute, > > I put libLLVMgold.so in /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.4 where cc1 is > also in. > > Are you sure that is llvm-gcc's cc1, and not your system compiler's? Try this: $ llvm-gcc -### -x c /dev/null Then look for a line