similar to: [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r79615 - in /llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/Profiling: ./ 2009-08-21-irregular-loop.ll 2009-08-21-only-one-block.ll 2009-08-21-several-blocks.ll dg.exp

It appears to me based on my experiments with llvm-as that literal floating-point constants may be specified in the 64-bit IEEE hexadecimal format, but not in the 32-bit format. For instance, this file: target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32- i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64- f80:128:128" target triple =

Hi I'm trying to implement something similar to the following R snippet using C. I seem to have hit the wall on accessing class slots using C. library(fPortfolio) lppData <- 100 * LPP2005.RET[, 1:6] ewSpec <- portfolioSpec() nAssets <- ncol(lppData) setWeights(ewSpec) <- rep(1/nAssets, times = nAssets) ewPortfolio <- feasiblePortfolio( data = lppData, spec = ewSpec,

Sorry, forgot attachment. On 23.07.09 07:40), Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Good Morning. > > On 22.07.09 14:47), Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >>> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >>> with the rest of this patch is that it

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, since I'm planing on a whole bunch of changes in the area of the Profiling Infrastructure I would like to ask humbly if it is possible to have approve-after-commit permission for the following files: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoLoader.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoTypes.h

Good Morning. On 22.07.09 14:47), Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >> with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in >> llvm-prof's behavior. I tried running edge profiling on the >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) Okay, here comes the next one. I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time. Greetings, Andi - --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > the next patches so that you can work on them

Hi! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Sorry for the lag time... No problem. As long as I know that you get to it sometime its fine for me... > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Hi Daniel! >> >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached

Hi All, I use llvm version 2.9. llvm-prof does not support to read path profiling info. So could I use any way else to read path profiling info? Thanks Linh ________________________________ From: Andreas Neustifter <andreas.neustifter at gmail.com> To: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> Cc: Linh Ho Tran <hotranlinh at yahoo.com>; "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Mailing

On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Sean Callanan wrote: > thanks for your comments. I'll respond to them individually. I've > attached a new revision of the patch that addresses them. Patch > built and tested against SVN 79487, with the additional attached fix > that fixes an Intel table bug. Thanks Sean, comments below. Are you sure you attached the updated patch? I

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas >> Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Daniel! >>> >>> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>>> >>>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the

Hi Daniel! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached > patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have > with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in > llvm-prof's behavior. I tried running edge profiling on the > MultiSource/Applications/aha benchmark in the llvm test-suite, and >

Dear LLVM Developers: I am an undergraduate summer research student supervised by José Nelson Amaral at the University of Alberta. My work will primarily involve value profiling and path profiling. Andreas Neustifter is planning some changes to the profiling related code in LLVM (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-February/020396.html). Are any of these changes in yet? Which

When I run a make on the openssh source directory, it starts the compile and then fails with: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -I. -I.. -I. -I./.. -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c bsd-arc4random.c In file included from ../openbsd-compat/openbsd-compat.h:35, from ../includes.h:169, from bsd-arc4random.c:25:

Hello, Anybody has it working with asterisk? Could you share your experience ( good/bad) Thank you -- Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua> Digital Generation

Is there any reference for the dg-104 telnet(shell) I need to log into a remote unit and reboot it over telnet. Its shell is not clear. David Hickman TSG Computer Consulting - Auctions 314-865-4752 x2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 287 bytes Desc: not available Url :

I once (for a brief period) had dialtone, but I do know why :) Otherwise I get a boooop-booop-booop sequence. I cannot tell if this is the D-Link doing this, or asterisk... Who should be giving solid US dialtone? My indication.conf says: [general] country=us ... [us] description = United States / North America ringcadance = 2000,4000

Hi, I'm using D-Link DG-104SH (H323 4 port FXS gateway) with analig phone connected to it and X-Lite softphone as endpoints with * When I calling from X-Lite to analog phone it's ok When I dilaling X-Lite from analog phone, X-Lite si ringind but whei I picked up X-Lite connection drops IP of DG-104SH is 192.168.1.3, H323 ID is GW1 X-Lite number is 233 Here is * output: -- Executing

Hi Andreas, Sorry for the lag time... On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Hi Daniel! > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >> with the rest of this patch is that it causes a