similar to: [LLVMdev] NightlyTester DB offline

hello every body, This suppose to be the work done by me so far. 1. Set up a local replica of LLVM nightly tester. 2. Read and understood how nightlytester works together with nightly tester script, NewNightlyTester.pl 3. Added a patch to nightly tester script (NewNightlyTester.pl) adding the capabilities: checking out the llvm-gcc source, compiling llvm-gcc, and gather required information

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Tanya Lattner<lattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Daniel Dunbar<daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > Since it came up, what is blocking us from putting these tests in the > > llvm-gcc test suite instead of in the LLVM test suite? > > Usually we

> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > > > At this moment I use > > "gmake TEST=nightly" command line to run night tester > > > > What I must specific and where to disable SPEC run (i don't have it) > > I think that it's currently a bug that this does not automatically happen. > > > I known about new NightlyTest.pl option:

We are experiencing serious load/memory issues on llvm.org and unfortunately, there is not anything we can do about it. This means that because the nightlytest page needs to access a mysql database, it will be very very slow. Bugzilla will be slow too. We have a machine being ordered, but it will take time to arrive and time to setup. Until then, I'm asking people to please try to be

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > At this moment I use > "gmake TEST=nightly" command line to run night tester > > What I must specific and where to disable SPEC run (i don't have it) I think that it's currently a bug that this does not automatically happen. > I known about new NightlyTest.pl option: -noexternals > But what I must do for

Hi Chris, > I think that this is a great idea. However, instead of picking up yet > another setting of testing infrastructure, I think we should make what > we have already (the nightly testers) better. In particular, the main > page of the tester: > http://llvm.org/nightlytest/ > > Already captures a lot of this: it tells you the number of unexpected > failures,

Hello, On Jun 3, 2008, at 08:52 , Tanya Lattner wrote: > All, > > We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you > could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now > we have virtually no testers covering this platform. I think I might be able to set up a nightly tester for Linux x86 (32- bit). Although I've been following LLVM for

> 1. Improvements to the perl script which manage actual testing > (./util/NewNightlyTest.pl) > (a). compiling llvm-gcc > (b). allowing someone to use an existing tree versus checking out a > new one > 2. The improvements to the email that get sent to the llvm-testresults > (a). finding a point in time where some test failed > (b). comparing two

> I am very much happy to announce that my GSoC 2008 proposal[1] was accepted. > Thank you very much for accepting my proposal. > My mentor is Tanya Lattner. > I would like to know how should I communicate with my mentor( using this > dev-list, #llvm at Oftc.net or by any other means)? The best way is to use llvm-dev. The community may have some comments and suggestions regarding

On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it >> before >> running tests. In addition to using a prebuilt binary. > > Does it need a prebuilt binary? > I have been suspecting so since it has been failing with BUILD ERROR

On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Devang Patel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Daniel Dunbar<daniel at zuster.org> > wrote: >> Since it came up, what is blocking us from putting these tests in the >> llvm-gcc test suite instead of in the LLVM test suite? > > Usually we want to check these tests regularly against llvm backend > changes. The nightly tester

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 6 February 2013 22:13, Arnaud de Grandmaison <arnaud.adegm at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I think we just need to increase coverage. Everything you can do to build >> (even slightly) differently than other bots is good to have. > > > Hi Arnaud, > > I agree building

At this moment I use "gmake TEST=nightly" command line to run night tester What I must specific and where to disable SPEC run (i don't have it) I known about new NightlyTest.pl option: -noexternals But what I must do for enable it Vladimir

All, We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now we have virtually no testers covering this platform. Directions to set up a tester are here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#nightly These directions could be improved of course. If you have any questions, I will be happy to assist you in

Hello list! Tanya Lattner wrote: > We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you > could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now > we have virtually no testers covering this platform. I've run the test last night to see how long it takes, and I can afford to cronjob it for the night. I didn't quite realize it would automatically

Hey All, I have been making some changes to the nightly tester that will hopefully make debugging problems and performance issues easier. The big change is nightly test results will now be kept in a central location (http://llvm.org/nightlytest/index.php). I have committed a new file to utils/ called 'NewNightlyTest.pl'. It *should* behave almost exactly like the previous NightlyTest.pl

Bah, headers still broken, sending to list this time: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:30 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 13, 2010, at 7:01 AM, R P Herrold wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> >>>>> I

Reid Spencer wrote: > It seems after the change on Zion that the nightly test is broken. When > I go to http://llvm.org/nightlytest/, I get a blank page. Any ideas? > According to the web server error log, there's a syntax error in the PHP script for that page. It looks like Patrick Jenkins made some changes earlier today (aka last last night). This is the error that I get:

hello everybody, I am very much happy to announce that my GSoC 2008 proposal[1] was accepted. Thank you very much for accepting my proposal. My mentor is Tanya Lattner. I would like to know how should I communicate with my mentor( using this dev-list, #llvm at Oftc.net or by any other means)? I started to work on my project(right now I am further looking into the nightly tester source[2] and the

>>>> llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind >>>> that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). >>> >>> This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time llvm >>> is built and the test run. Shouldn't this be part of >>> NewNightlyTest.pl then? >> >>