similar to: [LLVMdev] RFA: flag_objc_abi on Non-Darwin Platforms?

On May 8, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Is the flag_objc_abi variable available on non-Darwin platforms in > llvm-gcc? I want to use it in llvm-backend.cpp to conditionalize a > test. But I don't want to break Linux, Ada, Fortran, etc. If not, you can define it in objc-stubs.c -Chris

I'm trying to get the Ada gcc front-end to work with LLVM. This series of patches gets things to the point where the Ada compiler builds, though it fails to build itself or the runtime. While I was there I resurrected fortran and java: as with Ada, the compilers build but not the runtimes. Also, I've replaced the gcc 4.0 Ada front-end with a back-port of the Ada front-end from FSF gcc

On Sep 21, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > > My question is, is this liable to break something else down the line? > Should it be modified to call the getNamedGlobal method only if it's > an Objective-C property? Is this even the correct method for an > Objective-C property? There is a bigger question here. One invariant that is useful is that there is only a

The Constants.cpp file returns a ConstantAggregateZero object when you pass it a c"\000" string. Here is the code: Constant *ConstantArray::get(const ArrayType *Ty, const std::vector<Constant*> &V) { // If this is an all-zero array, return a ConstantAggregateZero object if (!V.empty()) { Constant *C = V[0]; if (!C->isNullValue())

Hi all, I have a patch that would potentially help Objective-C 2. In the "make_decl_llvm()" in llvm-backend.cpp, there is code to search through the already generated global variables. Objective-C goes through this code twice with the same identifier. The first time, is to create meta-data for a "property". The second time is to add a reference to that property into the

On Aug 10, 2008, at 11:40 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > >> The curent llvm svn (r54623) is unable to link the gfortran >> compiler in llvm-gcc-4.2 svn. I am getting the error... > ... >> Undefined symbols: >> "_create_init_utf16_var", referenced from: >> _darwin_build_constant_cfstring in libbackend.a(darwin.o) > > this is

> > 4. Running Fortran, Ada, C/C++/ObjC tests as well with test results emailed > > to the llvm-testresults. > > Are these different or new tests? Why wouldn't they just be a part of the > llvm-test module? Then you don't have to do any modifications to the > scripts. Probably means the gcc testsuite. Ciao, Duncan.

Not that I know of but it's definitely something we could use. The basic idea is to use the test-release.sh script that can be found in llvm source tree under utils/release. $ test-release.sh --help usage: test-release.sh -release X.Y -rc NUM [OPTIONS] -release X.Y The release number to test. -rc NUM The pre-release candidate number. -j NUM Number of compile jobs

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Duncan Sands wrote: >> How can I build the front-end to generate 16-bit integers? > > Please clarify your question. > If you are asking how to build llvm-gcc for a 16 bit target, > I think the answer is: (1) gcc itself doesn't support 16 bit > targets; (2) llvm doesn't currently support any 16 bit targets > (but could with a little work). So

On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > It's just horrendous. The standard answer, we welcome your contribution. > it appears like it still needs the darwin-c.c file linked in with it. No. That way lies insanity. You want to create stub routines in the ada/java/fortran front ends, or move the C specific bits into darwin- c.c and ensure that the language independent

Hello, how would I go porting llvm-gcc-4.2 to an “unknown” platform, i.e. MirBSD? For regular gcc, I’d have to add stuff to gcc/gcc/config/ and patch quite some configure scripts, but seeing that llvm-gcc uses LLVM for target specific stuff, how much of this still applies? cpp defines and startup files at the least, probably, for the com- piler driver… Which dependencies does llvm-gcc-4.2 have,

Hi all, I've only now noticed that on our Opteron boxes running Suse Enterprise Server 8 that R-2.0.1 did not pass make chek-all. It bombed in tests/lapack.R at: > eigenok <- function(A, E, Eps = 1000 * .Machine$double.eps) { V <- E$vect lam <- E$values stopifnot(abs(A %*% V - V %*% diag(lam)) < Eps, .... [TRUNCATED] > Ceigenok <- function(A, E, Eps =

hi all, After having some discussions in the IRC, I am trying here to come up with a proposal for GSoC 2008 for improving the llvm nightly tester[1].Following are the ideas and suggestions that came up in the discussion, if you have any comment or any other suggestion please add them to the list. I have some doubts in some places. 1. Improvements to the perl script which manage actual testing

I am trying to build llvm-gcc-4.2 but cannot figure out how to get past the problem described below. Any help will be much appreciated. Regards Roger gnatbind -C -I- -I. -Iada -I../../llvm-gcc-4.2/gcc/ada -o ada/b_gnat1.c -n ada/gnat1drv.ali error: "s-imenne.adb" must be compiled error: ("/opt/gnat-gpl-2009/lib/gcc/i386-apple-darwin10.2.0/4.3.4/adalib/s-imenne.ali" is obsolete

Hi everyone, I'm very new to the world of compilation and I've got to spend some time time on LLVM. As I have to produce a cross compiler for a completely new target and I don't want to cross-build the binutils, I choose Clang as a replacement frontend for llvm instead of llvm-gcc. But first, I just would like to compile something on my Linux platform in order to test the software,

Duncan, It would be useful to know what motivated this work -- in particular, is some organization (company, open source project team, research group, any other kind) interested in having an Ada front-end? Thanks, --Vikram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VIKRAM S. ADVE Associate Professor, Computer Science E-MAIL: vadve at cs.uiuc.edu Siebel

llvm (and clang) do not include binutils. You're seeing clang invoking the gcc shell to assemble the .s file that clang generated, then again to link the object file into an executable. On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Swiss Guy wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm very new to the world of compilation and I've got to spend some time > time on LLVM. > As I have to produce

I would like to see: (1) LLVM testsuite run every night for all targets, target variants and operating systems, for example by using an emulator to emulate targets for which the hardware is not available. The gcc project has a compile farm which might be usable for this, but we would need to ask them if it is ok. (2) Likewise for the gcc testsuite, with results emailed to the nightly test

> 1. Improvements to the perl script which manage actual testing > (./util/NewNightlyTest.pl) > (a). compiling llvm-gcc > (b). allowing someone to use an existing tree versus checking out a > new one > 2. The improvements to the email that get sent to the llvm-testresults > (a). finding a point in time where some test failed > (b). comparing two

>>> 4. Running Fortran, Ada, C/C++/ObjC tests as well with test results emailed >>> to the llvm-testresults. >> >> Are these different or new tests? Why wouldn't they just be a part of the >> llvm-test module? Then you don't have to do any modifications to the >> scripts. > > Probably means the gcc testsuite. Well then this should be