similar to: [LLVMdev] assert problem embedding llvm libs in linux - stuck

On Mar 31, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote: > I'm not so familiar with the internals of LLVM nor standard practices > for development on Linux, so I wondered if there is an experienced > developer on the list who can spot the problem immediately...? Sure, you can't have two copies of the libraries that can see each other. Put them into one shared library used by both

Lang - I've made some progress writing my register allocator, but now I'm stuck. I have 2 questions for you: 1. I tried running the PBQP allocator (as a dynamic pass), but that didn't work. When I type this: llc -f -load Debug/lib/regalloc.so -regalloc=pbqp simple.bc I get the following error: llc:

Based on cmake/modules/LLVMLibDeps.cmake, I produced a graphviz dot file and then manually removed components and edges until the graph was small enough to be presentable. I don't know if I can actually use LLVM due to its humongousness, but I hope the graph will be helpful to others attempting to comprehend LLVM. PNG attached; dot file follows. digraph G { ipo

Hi all, (Sorry if the answer to this is obvious - and thanks in advance~) Short version: linker error of _backtrace from LLVMSystem.a building a dynamic library embedding LLVM/clang, both against the OSX 10.4 sdk. Long version: I've just tried rebuilding my project using the 2.6 release, using the following commands to try and force LLVM to build against the OSX 10.4 sdk (I am

On Oct 25, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote: > Hi all, > > (Sorry if the answer to this is obvious - and thanks in advance~) > > Short version: > linker error of _backtrace from LLVMSystem.a building a dynamic > library embedding LLVM/clang, both against the OSX 10.4 sdk. > > Long version: > I've just tried rebuilding my project using the 2.6 release,

Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit : > > On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote: > >> Sorry if this is a newb q... I'm developing an application on a >> 10.5 machine but want to target the 10.4 SDK. Is there a magic >> incantation for the llvm configure script to set the sysroot path, >> equivalent to e.g. --with-sysroot

Hi, For the record, adding UNIVERSAL_SDK_PATH=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/ was insufficient to restrict the .a/.o files to link against the 10.4 sdk, but env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.4 make did the trick. Thanks! On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit : > >> >> On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM,

Sorry if this is a newb q... I'm developing an application on a 10.5 machine but want to target the 10.4 SDK. Is there a magic incantation for the llvm configure script to set the sysroot path, equivalent to e.g. --with-sysroot "/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk"? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi there, I'm having trouble getting ExecutionEngine->runStaticConstructorsDestructors(module, true) to actually trigger static destructors in my code. The static constructors however do get called. I don't know if this is an LLVM or Clang issue, from looking at the IR (see below) it looks like the destructor is being tied to cxa_atexit, and I wonder if that is not called by

Help please- I am running 3.3.1 on Centos using a 10GB network. I get reasonable write speeds, although I think they could be faster. But my read speeds are REALLY slow. Executive summary: On gluster client- Writes average about 700-800MB/s Reads average about 70-80MB/s On server- Writes average about 1-1.5GB/s Reads average about 2-3GB/s Any thoughts? Here are some additional details:

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Graham Wakefield <wakefield at mat.ucsb.edu> wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm having trouble getting ExecutionEngine->runStaticConstructorsDestructors(module, true) to actually trigger static destructors in my code. The static constructors however do get called. > > I don't know if this is an LLVM or Clang issue, from looking at the IR (see

Further to my last email, I've been trying to find out why GlusterFS is favouring one brick over another. In pretty much all of my tests gluster is favouring the MOST full brick to write to. This is not a good thing when the most full brick has less than 200GB free and I need to write a huge file to it. I've set cluster.min-free-disk on the volume, and it doesn't seem to have an

On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote: > Sorry if this is a newb q... I'm developing an application on a 10.5 > machine but want to target the 10.4 SDK. Is there a magic > incantation for the llvm configure script to set the sysroot path, > equivalent to e.g. --with-sysroot "/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk"? > Try 'make

Hi folks I have some data to which I've been fitting linear mixed effects models. I am currently using a lme model in the nlme package, with terms for random effects due to repeated measures on individuals and the corCAR1 serial correlation structure. However, there is some suggestion in the data (and from theory) that a breakpoint (change point) model may be more appropriate. Scott, Norman

Hi Is anyone experiencing Icecast streams dropping out after about 8-12 seconds in Edge or IE? It's fine in Chrome or Firefox. It's also fine in the new Chromium based Edge. I have a number of listeners reporting it. It also happens on some of the streams in the http://dir.xiph.org/ Icecast directory (Alt Rock 97, Wakefield FM, KBSU, 80s 90s Hit Radio etc.). Here's one of my stream

This is not really a problem just something I noticed in my testing.. When two or more Asterisk servers are connected by IAX2 trunks it does not make use of any "shortest path" type system.. (maybe this is still planned somwhere down the line, but may come in handy to those who have multi asterisk installations) Here is the setup.. UA1--- Asterisk1----[IAX2 Trunk]---Asterisk2---UA2

In X86CodeGen.cpp, the following code appears in the handler used for CALL64pcrel32 instructions: // Assume undefined functions may be outside the Small codespace. bool NeedStub = (Is64BitMode && (TM.getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Large || TM.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>().isTargetDarwin())) || Opcode == X86::TAILJMPd;

<div dir="auto">For what it's worth, it's working in NZ/vodafone/android firefox for me<br></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Gavin Stephens <gavin@stephens.net.nz><br>Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 15:59<br>To: icecast@xiph.org<br>Subject: Re: [Icecast]

Quick related Q: Does the global lock of the JIT during code generation prevent concurrent execution of already JIT-ted code? Thanks. On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Jan 12, 2009, at 11:10, Edgar Geisler wrote: > >> my goal is to create a service with multiple threads, each of them >> generating IR code and JIT'ing/executing it in their threads

I'd love to read this article, but I can't justify paying to register. Will it become a 'freely available' article at any point soon? Thanks On Jan 25, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: > > Following on from the success of our previous OCaml Journal articles > covering > LLVM, we have begun a series dedicated to the design and > implementation of >