similar to: [LLVMdev] store the LLVM-bitcode from a pass

Hi Duncan, thanks for the answer. But "opt -load ..../Decorator.so -dec <prog.bc> new_prog.bc" creates an invalid file. When i use "lli", i get "lli: error loading program 'new_prog.bc': Invalid bitcode signature" I have done the followings: 1) used "opt -p -load ..../Decorator.so -dec <prog.bc> new_prog.bc" 2) copied the output

These are the contents of the generated file. Start >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' target datalayout =

Hi, take a look inside the file new_prog.bc. How does it start? Ciao, Duncan.

Ok, but what about a pass like alias-analysis. How are the results stored, so that other passes can use them. -Raad ________________________________ From: Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:52:58 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] information-transfer between analysis-pases On Tue, Feb 17,

Hello together, how can i insert annotations in IR ? I want actually write something like: CallInst *call = CallInst::Create( ??? , aBasicBlock); in my pass. Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090305/cd1db761/attachment.html>

Hi, As far as I know, Instruction class does not inherit "Annotable" Class. Only Function inherits annotable according to the documentation of annotable class. What you are asking would require adding annotations at instruction level, which does not seem to be possible. You can maintain external maps between instructions and your annotations, --Kapil On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM,

Hello together, I have seen that the analysis-results are stored in llvm-IR as annotations. For example <; preds = %entry> in basicBlock level and <; <i32*> [#uses=2]> for a variable. Is there any documentation about annotations? Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello together, although i use the "-O0" flag as follow, the llvm perform dead code elimination. How can i disable optimizing completely? KR Raad llvm-gcc -O0 -emit-llvm main.cpp -S -o main.s -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081127/c4ef8aac/attachment.html>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:46 AM, RAAD B <raad_7007 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello together, > > I have seen that the analysis-results are stored in llvm-IR as annotations. > For example <; preds = %entry> in basicBlock level and <; <i32*> [#uses=2]> > for a variable. > > Is there any documentation about annotations? That isn't really analysis;

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:14 AM, RAAD B <raad_7007 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello together, > > although i use the "-O0" flag as follow, the llvm perform dead code > elimination. > How can i disable optimizing completely? Sorry, it's not possible; the gcc front-end does some optimizations which the LLVM backend can't do anything about, and dead code

Hi Eli, I want to disable optimizations because, i'm going to implement a framework in JAVA for educational purposes. I have planned to do followings: 1) Create LLVM-IR and export it as Assembly (without optimizing the source-code) 2) Transform the LLVM-Assembly to a data-structure, similar to LLVM data structure (Module, Function, BB ...) but implemented in Java 3) Optimizing

Hi, how can I create the IR-representation from multiple source-files? Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090415/9040f657/attachment.html>

Hello. I read following article in this ML. I'm implementing the library similar with RAAD's plan. - AST node classes for LLVM-IR - LLVM-Assembly writer class - 100% pure Java - Without any optimizations - Without any frontends (parsers) I would like to release my library publicly if all problems below could be solved. (Although it is in the early stage) My library is the mixture of my

Hi, i need a sample-code, for which the llvm alias-analysis finds a *must-aliases*. I have tried codes like followings. In all cases, i see just *may-aliases* when i use "opt -aa-eval -print-all-alias-modref-info foo.bc": Regards Raad 1 ========================================== void foo() { int i = 2; int& r = i; } 2 =========================================== void

Hi together, i want to create a map containing a set of aliases for each value. For example, for a code like: int main() { int i; int *p1 = &i; int *p2 = &i; return 0; } the map should contain something like: {i --> (p1, p2), ..... } For that, i do followings in my pass: AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>(); AliasSetTracker *tracker =

if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/opt/Xgl/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libwnck-1.0 -I/opt/Xgl/include -I/usr/include/metacity-1 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yesterday I sent a patch (http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/24252/) against the latest compiz ubuntu gutsy source package to Amaranth, to make compiz compile (and package, of course) the gtk-window-decorator in two ways: 1) as gtk-window-decorator (= compiz-gtk package) using these configuration parameters: --disable-gnome \

The window decoration system in compiz is implemented using a decoration plugin and a separate window decoration drawing application (a decorator). The decorator is drawing window decorations to minimal sized pixmaps. These pixmaps along with sets of coordinates which maps the pixmaps to windows are communicated back to the decorator plugin through a property on the client window. The coordinates

Here a patch to make move plugin take care of CompWindowActionMoveMask. http://hibbert.univ-lille3.fr/~cbellegarde/Compiz/respectWindowActions.patch There is also a bug in gtk-window-decorator. If you use this plugin: http://forum.go-compiz.org/viewtopic.php?t=643 Set your terminal to be non movable, terminal window doesn't have _NET_WM_ACTION_MOVE, but you can move it with decoration.

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:36 AM, RAAD B <raad_7007 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > I want to disable optimizations because, i'm going to implement a framework > in JAVA for educational purposes. > > I have planned to do followings: > > 1) Create LLVM-IR and export it as Assembly (without optimizing the > source-code) > 2) Transform the