similar to: [LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM

On Jan 17, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Albert Graef wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> In the end, I consider this to be a yet-another chapter in the >> "functional language people don't like LLVM" saga. > > Yet another counterexample: > > http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/ Hey, this is incredibly cool. I had never heard of pure, nice work! Would you mind writing a

Chris Lattner wrote: > In the end, I consider this to be a yet-another chapter in the > "functional language people don't like LLVM" saga. Yet another counterexample: http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/ LLVM from the ground up, proper tail calls, interactive interpreter, JIT, easy C interface. Works great. :) Without LLVM, I could have never pulled that off in a couple of

On Jan 17, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > This may be of interest: > > http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/case-against-cllvm.html > > People implementing a new Haskell compiler explain why LLVM is an > unsuitable target for them. I find the article, and particularly the preceding one (http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-is-lhc.html ) to be quite

This may be of interest: http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/case-against-cllvm.html People implementing a new Haskell compiler explain why LLVM is an unsuitable target for them.

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Tobias Nurmiranta wrote: > > Cool, ok. Have you seen the LLVM GC support that is already available: > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GarbageCollection.html > > > > It should be able to support scheme well, though there may be some missing > > bits. > > Yes, I will read/use it closer and try to use it, and say if I miss > something.

Hi! Essential Haskell Compiler (EHC) also has llvm backend. http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/bin/view/Ehc/WebHome http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/bin/view/Stc/CompilingHaskellToLLVM Cheers, Csaba -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090118/33489dd6/attachment.html>

It's nice that he claims it's way too high overhead without any, you know, data. Then again, he also thinks writing a good native code generator isn't that difficult, so .... On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov <foldr at codedgers.com> wrote: > This may be of interest: > > http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/case-against-cllvm.html > > People

And the followup: http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/why-llvm-probably-wont-replace-c.html On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov <foldr at codedgers.com> wrote: > > This may be of interest: > > http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/case-against-cllvm.html > > People implementing a new Haskell compiler explain why LLVM is an > unsuitable target

Hi All, On the LLVM publications page (http://llvm.org/pubs/) we try to collect all of the papers that have been published that use LLVM, regardless of whether they are done at Illinois or not. If you have written a paper and used LLVM to do it, or know someone who has, please let me know so I can add the info to the page. For us, it shows the sorts of things that people are doing with

Hi, I am just starting a new project. I found that the above script rejects Autoconf versions later than 2.59, whereas it ought to accept them, imho. I had to edit the scrip to be able to use it with Autoconf 2.61. Also, aclocal gave the following warning: /usr/share/aclocal/oaf.m4:4: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_OAF /usr/share/aclocal/oaf.m4:4: run info '(automake)Extending

Hi, thanks for your mail! On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > That is wonderful! Wow, you did this just ~1 month? :) Yes :), even less, but that is since I used the structure from SICP, see the URL below. > Cool, ok. Have you seen the LLVM GC support that is already available: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GarbageCollection.html > > It should be able to support

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > http://www.ida.liu.se/~tobnu/scheme2llvm/ > > Looks great! > > > (what's a blurb? :) > > Just a summary, so that I can add an entry to this page: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ProjectsWithLLVM/ Maybe this for now: "This is a small self applicable scheme compiler for LLVM. The code is quite similar to the code in

> > That is similar to the approach I used, although HLVM provides a pointer directly to the type, saving you a single hop. I'm not so sure that is a very good reason, depending on your implementation data structures that are fundamental to the type system of the virtual machine use custom allocators so the extra hop carries little to no expense. I would not have considered it had I

On 03.12.2013 14:30, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Can you send a patch? Hi Rafael, the patch is attached. @Mikael, Tim Thanks for the help. I really needed only the link to the repo. Regards, Kai > > On 2 December 2013 06:44, Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC >> compiler. All

Hello, I didn't see any section on this site for LLVM language bindings. There is http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/ but that seems to be more about self-contained applications of LLVM. I think it would be useful to add a page (or section to an existing page) if you all agree. My binding is https://github.com/keithshep/llvm-fs and I know that there are many others. Best, Keith

1) I want to calculate a regression, but when I enter > lm(formula=KS~libor+adj.close) I only get the following: Call: lm(formula = KS ~ libor + adj.close) Coefficients: (Intercept) libor adj.close -56.38666 55.39709 -0.01836 I don't get the estimated standard deviation, error, t-value etc. anymore which I used to get when I use an old version (2yrs ago). What command

Hello I am trying to import the attached file Curva LIBOR to R. I am trying to use the following commands and obtaining the following errors > res <- read.xlsx("C:\\Users\\FELIPE PARRA\\Documents\\Quantil\\Federacion\\Curva LIBOR.xlsx", 4) Error en .jcall(rowCells[[ic]], "I", "getColumnIndex") : RcallMethod: invalid object parameter > res <-

Hello Everyone > bindings. There is http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/ but that seems to > be more about self-contained applications of LLVM. I think it would be > useful to add a page (or section to an existing page) if you all > agree. My binding is https://github.com/keithshep/llvm-fs and I know > that there are many others. +1. Keith, if you'll create such page including

On Sunday 25 November 2007 21:00, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> Lexing is the one issue though. > > > > How do you mean? > > I think he's observing that a majority of the tutorial code is > actually spent on the lexer and parser, not on the llvm-specific pieces. Right. > > I'm just fiddling around with it now. The lexer, parser and AST > > written

about 30mbits/s (3750kBytes/s) from a Windows NT Workstation to the Samba server, and, as strange as it may be, 25mbits/s (3175kBytes/s) from the Samba server to the NT Workstation. Using FTP, I get the same both ways (30mbits/s)... I don't know why my from Samba to Windows speed is slower than the other direction, but the speed is not bad for a Pentium 100, so i'm not complaining. What