similar to: gmime-2.1.19 and mime decoding

# yum update ... --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos for package: gmime-sharp ---> Package gmime20.i386 0:2.2.26-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution gmime-sharp-2.2.10-5.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos is needed by package

When I do "yum update gmime gmime-sharp" I get: ... --> Missing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos is needed by package gmime-sharp-2.2.10-5.el5.centos.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos is needed by package gmime-sharp-2.2.10-5.el5.centos.i386 (installed) ... But both of these are already installed: # rpm -q gmime gmime-sharp

I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b results of ifconfig -a lo Link encap:Local Loopback wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 70:18:8B:80:AE:71 There is no

Running: yum list available | grep -i gmime shows results for CentOS 5, but not for CentOS 6. It seems to be needed by my pan. What should I do? Thanks, Mike.

Thanks for your help. I did pick up an additional entry in the audit file : type=AVC msg=audit(1504561395.709:10196): avc: denied { execute } for pid=19163 comm="/usr/sbin/httpd" name="s.check.cgi" dev="dm-0" ino=537182029 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file Unfortunately, I am not sure how the

Everyone, I am putting together a new mail server for our firm using a SuperMicro with Centos 7.0. When performed the install of the os, I put 16 gigs of memory in the wrong slots on the mother board which caused the SuperMicro to recognize 8 gigs instead of 16 gigs. When I installed Centos 7.0, this error made the swap file 8070 megs instead of what I would have expected to be a over 16000

Everyone, about 4 years ago, I tried to install CentOS 6 on a Supermicro server with SCSI drives using a LSI raid system. I could never figure out or find a way to make the installation disc of Centos 6 identify the SCSI drives. The installation disc for Centos 5 identified the SCSI drives without a problem. I finally gave up on Centos 6 and installed Centos 5 and the system has worked very

Am 04.07.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at PoMec.Net>: > On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 08:07 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >> Everyone, >> >> Looks like the new version of oppenssl has broken my sendmail's use >> of >> tls. Has anyone else had this problem or seen a fix? >> >> Greg Ennis >>

Am 13.05.2018 um 18:00 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at PoMec.Net>: > > I have started the process of trying to replace our templates with a > new font. 'Liberation mono' is a close match, but for some reason I > don't like the way it looks when the whole page of type is scanned all > together. Try to convert the type1 fonts into a truetype container (using

Everyone, Is there a way to have Centos boot when no keyboard is present. I have a firewall and another mail server that would fit into a closet a little better without a keyboard. I tried to remove the keyboard but the system hangs giving me notice that a keyboard was not found. Greg Ennis

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; option routers 192.168.0.1; option

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 20:27 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 14:05 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 12:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > Everyone, > > > > > > With the update to Centos 7.5 it is apparent that we lost the Courier > > > 10 Pitch fonts that were

Everyone, Have any of you installed ubiguiti wireless routers on your network? It looks like the setup requires the use of software; they have some packages that are ready made for Ubuntu and Debian, but not RedHat https://www.ubnt.com/download/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-pro Have any of you tried or succeeded in installation this on Centos 7.4? Greg Ennis

Everyone, I am trying to use a cgi perl script for a CentOs 7 website that works fine with selinux in permissive mode but fails with selinux in enforcing mode. The problem I have is that I can not find where the selinux error message is being recorded. It does not appear to be in the /var/log/messages or /var/log/audit/audit.log. I do not get any /var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log entries. I do get

Everyone, I have just upgraded a Centos 5 server to a Centos 7 server and am having difficulty with a change of behavior of mailx with the use of a command line of : mail -s 'This is the subject' user at domain.com < text_file.txt On Centos 5 when mailx was used by a program started by a cron job we were able to send a text file as an email message and the headers did not contain

-----Original Message-----From: John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> Reply-to: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] SCSI drives and Centos 7 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 13:31:11 -0700 On 4/29/2017 12:42 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > what does `lspci` have to say about this raid card ? > > John, > > Thanks for the prompt

Looks like RedHat released 5.0 on schedule. Does anyone have an idea when CentOS 5.0 will be ready? I would also like to thank the CentOs team for what they are doing...... Thank you!!!!!!! Greg Ennis

To All, Thanks to the CentOS guys for 5.4; sure appreciate your work. I have one question. I had to remove perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on two x86_64 machines in order to get perl.x86_64 4:5.8.8-27.el5 to update. Does this represent a change from 5.3 to 5.4 and should I be concerned about the loss of perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386. So far I have not found anything broken. Greg Ennis

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > What appears is below. Removing dependent packages is required. Removing unused dependencies is optional. dnf remove *subscription* --noautoremove should remove the dependent packages but keep thee unused dependencies if you want them. There's also a setting in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to set the default behaviour of the autoremove

Everyone, Looks like the new version of oppenssl has broken my sendmail's use of tls. Has anyone else had this problem or seen a fix? Greg Ennis