similar to: [LLVMdev] Implementing Java bindings to LLVM

Hi Eli, I want to disable optimizations because, i'm going to implement a framework in JAVA for educational purposes. I have planned to do followings: 1) Create LLVM-IR and export it as Assembly (without optimizing the source-code) 2) Transform the LLVM-Assembly to a data-structure, similar to LLVM data structure (Module, Function, BB ...) but implemented in Java 3) Optimizing

Hi Duncan, thanks for the answer. But "opt -load ..../Decorator.so -dec <prog.bc> new_prog.bc" creates an invalid file. When i use "lli", i get "lli: error loading program 'new_prog.bc': Invalid bitcode signature" I have done the followings: 1) used "opt -p -load ..../Decorator.so -dec <prog.bc> new_prog.bc" 2) copied the output

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:14 AM, RAAD B <raad_7007 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello together, > > although i use the "-O0" flag as follow, the llvm perform dead code > elimination. > How can i disable optimizing completely? Sorry, it's not possible; the gcc front-end does some optimizations which the LLVM backend can't do anything about, and dead code

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:36 AM, RAAD B <raad_7007 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > I want to disable optimizations because, i'm going to implement a framework > in JAVA for educational purposes. > > I have planned to do followings: > > 1) Create LLVM-IR and export it as Assembly (without optimizing the > source-code) > 2) Transform the

Ok, but what about a pass like alias-analysis. How are the results stored, so that other passes can use them. -Raad ________________________________ From: Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:52:58 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] information-transfer between analysis-pases On Tue, Feb 17,

Hi, As far as I know, Instruction class does not inherit "Annotable" Class. Only Function inherits annotable according to the documentation of annotable class. What you are asking would require adding annotations at instruction level, which does not seem to be possible. You can maintain external maps between instructions and your annotations, --Kapil On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM,

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:46 AM, RAAD B <raad_7007 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello together, > > I have seen that the analysis-results are stored in llvm-IR as annotations. > For example <; preds = %entry> in basicBlock level and <; <i32*> [#uses=2]> > for a variable. > > Is there any documentation about annotations? That isn't really analysis;

These are the contents of the generated file. Start >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' target datalayout =

Hello together, although i use the "-O0" flag as follow, the llvm perform dead code elimination. How can i disable optimizing completely? KR Raad llvm-gcc -O0 -emit-llvm main.cpp -S -o main.s -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081127/c4ef8aac/attachment.html>

Hello together, how can i insert annotations in IR ? I want actually write something like: CallInst *call = CallInst::Create( ??? , aBasicBlock); in my pass. Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090305/cd1db761/attachment.html>

Hello together, I have seen that the analysis-results are stored in llvm-IR as annotations. For example <; preds = %entry> in basicBlock level and <; <i32*> [#uses=2]> for a variable. Is there any documentation about annotations? Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, how can I create the IR-representation from multiple source-files? Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090415/9040f657/attachment.html>

Hi, i need a sample-code, for which the llvm alias-analysis finds a *must-aliases*. I have tried codes like followings. In all cases, i see just *may-aliases* when i use "opt -aa-eval -print-all-alias-modref-info foo.bc": Regards Raad 1 ========================================== void foo() { int i = 2; int& r = i; } 2 =========================================== void

Hi together, i want to create a map containing a set of aliases for each value. For example, for a code like: int main() { int i; int *p1 = &i; int *p2 = &i; return 0; } the map should contain something like: {i --> (p1, p2), ..... } For that, i do followings in my pass: AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>(); AliasSetTracker *tracker =

Hi there, I wanted to use RedCloth with my RubyOnRails 3 application, but it seems that RoR uses 1.9.2''s Psych by default as the YAML parser if available, and Psych fails to load the LaTeX entities file: ==================================================================== #ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30365) [x86_64-linux] irb(main):001:0> Dir.pwd =>

Dear R Users. I just discovered today a problem in the use of quotation marks when I'm doing some programs in R. I'm using windows vista environment. The programs that I wrote in the University, made in Windows XP machines run perfectly, but when I run those in my laptop with VISTA, there are many errors. Those errors are due to the type of quotation marks. In the university the quotation

8. You have join to this mail a text file with the few characters that don't = match. On Swat, it's easier. = I use Swat from my win98 box. When I write a share comment with some chara= cters, there are not translated properly inside smb.conf file. = When I read my smb.conf file, I noticed that for example a cp1252 characte= r like (0xC1) has been changed onto an ISO8859-15 character

Hello together, I use the "opt" as following, to run my pass, which modifies the LLVM-IR by inserting instructions in basic-blocks. opt -load ..../Decorator.so -dec <prog.bc> /dev/null how can i store the modified bitcode on the disc (as bitcode or as human-readable assembly)? Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

dovecot version v2.2.29 v2.2.36 v2.3.5 LIST "" * The returned mailbox does not display quotes dovecot version v2.1.17 LIST "" * The returned mailbox shows quotation marks Why is the quotation mark removed in the new version? Is there any configuration option in the new version to add quotes? Because I see a lot of big public mailboxes with quotation marks.

Dear all, One of my friends asked me if it is possible to extract actual R function arguments literally (precisely, as strings). The reason is simple. He feels sometimes awkward to attach quotation marks :-). What he actually wants is to pass R command arguments to XLisp subroutines (He has been an enthusiastic XLisp user for a long time and still tends to use R as a wrapper to XLisp). Is it