similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.4 Release Blockers

> The 2.4 release is blocked by PR2888. If anyone can help debug this > problem, it would help us get the release out sooner. SPEC is not publicly available, is that right? Maybe it's possible to attach some reduced code to the PR so that people without SPEC can take a look. Ciao, Duncan.

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing:

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

LLVMers, The 2.4 pre-release (v2) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary. 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the

All, There has been a huge lack of response to the release. We need people to help fix regressions and to participate in testing the release. Without this support, I see no reason that the release team should spend their time qualifying a release. We need to get all regressions fixed before 2.7 can continue onto pre-release2. Please take a look at all release blockers:

Dear Tanya: > You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version > of xcode do you have installed? Xcode 2.4.1 > Can you send me the following files? > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz) Best regards, 2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at

On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote: > Please take a look at all release blockers: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug. 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the ones you're working on?) Which bugs do you have patches for? I don't want to start looking at something if

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

Thanks for testing the release. Overall the test results look decent with a couple exceptions. You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version of xcode do you have installed? Can you send me the following files? SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* Thanks, Tanya On Jan 26, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Takanori Ishikawa

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > LLVMers, > > The 2.4 pre-release is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use

On Tuesday 30 March 2010 17:45:16 David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Please take a look at all release blockers: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 > > 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug. > > 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the > ones you're working on?)

On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:45 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> Please take a look at all release blockers: >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 > > 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug. > Will take care of this. > 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the >

On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:04 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 30 March 2010 17:45:16 David Greene wrote: >> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> Please take a look at all release blockers: >>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 >> >> 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug. >> >> 6640 appears to be a test

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ > I'm updating the Fedora packaging of LLVM, and with the 02/20 prerelease it fails to build on ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1148023 make[1]: Entering directory

My test results for the LLVM 2.2 prerelease. === Q. Target === * Mac OS X 10.4.11 * 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo * MacBook % uname -a Darwin macbook.local 8.11.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.1: Wed Oct 10 18:23:28 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.25.20~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386 === Q. How you built the release === * objDir != srcDir * Release build * llvm-gcc-4.2 from source

LLVMers, The 2.4 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary. 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the