All, There has been a huge lack of response to the release. We need people to help fix regressions and to participate in testing the release. Without this support, I see no reason that the release team should spend their time qualifying a release. We need to get all regressions fixed before 2.7 can continue onto pre-release2. Please take a look at all release blockers: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 If you can help fix any of these bugs, we would really appreciate it. I'd advise using the release branch directly instead of the tarballs since several fixes have gone in. There are 2 patches I have left to merge once I resolve the conflicts. Thanks, Tanya P.S. Thanks to the few that have tested the release. I appreciate your help!
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote:> Please take a look at all release blockers: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=65865893 is not release-critical according to Doug. 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the ones you're working on?) Which bugs do you have patches for? I don't want to start looking at something if it's already being fixed. -Dave
On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:45 PM, David Greene wrote:> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> Please take a look at all release blockers: >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 > > 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug. >Will take care of this.> 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the > ones you're working on?) > > Which bugs do you have patches for? I don't want to start looking at > something if it's already being fixed. >Depends on: 6616 6654 6663 6696 6725 6744 6663 is waiting on a patch that can apply to the branch. The rest are open. -Tanya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100330/97ff7f8c/attachment.html>
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 17:45:16 David Greene wrote:> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Please take a look at all release blockers: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 > > 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug. > > 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the > ones you're working on?) > > Which bugs do you have patches for? I don't want to start looking at > something if it's already being fixed.And I can't pull the 27 branch: % svn info . Path: . URL: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches Repository Root: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project Repository UUID: 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 Revision: 99954 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: dpatel Last Changed Rev: 99943 Last Changed Date: 2010-03-30 17:20:25 -0500 (Tue, 30 Mar 2010) % svn update release_27 svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 403 Forbidden (http://llvm.org) I tried update -N release_27 (which worked), then cd release_27 && svn update but no luck. I apparently have no svn-fu. What's the magic incantation? -Dave
We are still looking for people to help with these release blockers. So please fix what you can :) The release is delayed until we get these fixed. -Tanya On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:> All, > > There has been a huge lack of response to the release. We need people to help fix regressions and to participate in testing the release. Without this support, I see no reason that the release team should spend their time qualifying a release. > > We need to get all regressions fixed before 2.7 can continue onto pre-release2. > > Please take a look at all release blockers: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 > > If you can help fix any of these bugs, we would really appreciate it. I'd advise using the release branch directly instead of the tarballs since several fixes have gone in. There are 2 patches I have left to merge once I resolve the conflicts. > > Thanks, > Tanya > > P.S. Thanks to the few that have tested the release. I appreciate your help! > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev