similar to: [LLVMdev] Weirdness w/ llvm control flow graph generation

LLVM seems to be generating way too complex of branching based on the short-circuit optimization. The code in question is as follows: define void @ test_fc_while_and(float %x, float %y, float addrspace(11)* %result) nounwind { entry: %tobool3 = fcmp une float %x, 0.000000e+000 ; <i1> [#uses=1] %tobool24 = fcmp une float %y, 0.000000e+000 ;

On Oct 13, 2008, at 5:14 PMPDT, Villmow, Micah wrote: > As stated in an earlier email, I am working on getting break/ > continue to work correctly for my backend, but I ran into another > issue with codegen and the CFG. It seems that code gen is not done > based on the CFG, but rather on the block numbers, and the function > call MachineFunction::RenumberBlocks doesn’t

As stated in an earlier email, I am working on getting break/continue to work correctly for my backend, but I ran into another issue with codegen and the CFG. It seems that code gen is not done based on the CFG, but rather on the block numbers, and the function call MachineFunction::RenumberBlocks doesn't renumber the blocks based on the CFG. So how can I modify the CFG so that when codegen

Hi, I try to write a new backend. At the moment I run into a compiler error and don't know how I can solve this problem. Like several other targets I have a file 'mybackendTargetInfo.cpp' in the subdirectory 'TargetInfo'. The content of this file is: #include "mybackend.h" #include "llvm/Module.h" #include "llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h" using

Hi there, I am doing relocation in my backend by calling my function getAddrNonPic: SDValue getAddrNonPIC(NodeTy *N, SDLoc DL, EVT Ty, SelectionDAG &DAG)const{ SValue Hi=getTarget(N,Ty,DAG, MyBackend::Hi16); SValue Lo=getTarget(N,Ty,DAG, MyBackend::Lo16); return DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, Ty, DAG.getNode(MyBackend::Hi16, DL, Ty, Hi), DAG.getNode(MyBackend::Lo16, DL, Ty, Ho)); }

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > LLVM seems to be generating way too complex of branching based on the > short-circuit optimization. The code in question is as follows: > > define void @ test_fc_while_and(float %x, float %y, float addrspace(11)* > %result) nounwind { > > entry: > > %tobool3 = fcmp une float

Hi I have written a pass which creates some scheduling information. Its called MParSchedule. This pass works with opt. But when feeding it my experimental backend it seems to loose instructions and fails to work. I am loading this stuff as .so libraries under linux and i am using the amd64 version with a self compiled llvm-gcc. With this call it works: opt

Hi, I want to invoke the AddReadAttrs pass with my software backend (derived from TargetMachine like CBackend). CBackend uses addPassesToEmitWholeFile-method for invoking several passes. I tried to use the same method, but it failed on runtime. Running llc with my backend produces (mac os x 10.5 and llvm 2.4): dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found:

How do I determine what type of register(i.e. i32, f32, etc..) I am accessing from a MachineOperand? I.e. how do I get to the MVT struct, or equivalent information, from a MachineOperand object? Micah Villmow Systems Engineer Advanced Technology & Performance Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 4555 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara, CA. 95054 P: 408-572-6219 F: 408-572-6596

Is there a known way to get pattern matching on the address space from tablegen? Micah Villmow Systems Engineer Advanced Technology & Performance Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 4555 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara, CA. 95054 P: 408-572-6219 F: 408-572-6596 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have a tablegen string that I want to add a modifier to the registers that are being matched. For example a simple match on fneg: def FNEG : OneInOneOut<IL_OP_MOV, (outs GPR:$dst), (ins GPR:$src0), "mov $dst, $src0", [(set GPR:$dst, (fneg GPR:$src0))]>; I want to place a modifier directly after $src0 in the string so that no space is between the string and

You can get to the MachineInstr from a MachineOperand. Then get to its TargetInstrDesc and TargetOperandInfo which has register class information. Evan On Sep 23, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > How do I determine what type of register(i.e. i32, f32, etc..) I am > accessing from a MachineOperand? I.e. how do I get to the MVT > struct, or equivalent information, from

Is there a way for tablegen to generate patterns for all the data types of a specific register class instead of just the first one? Micah Villmow Systems Engineer Advanced Technology & Performance Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 4555 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara, CA. 95054 P: 408-572-6219 F: 408-572-6596 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

When I setup my InstrFormat fields, I added some custom fields specific for my backend. How do I access these from inside LLVM? For example: class InstrFormat<dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern> : Instruction { let Namespace = "AMD"; dag OutOperandList = outs; dag InOperandList = ins; let Pattern = pattern; let

A Function is a Value. See Value.h, look for getName(), etc. Evan On Sep 10, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I am attemping to figure out how to access the function names that > are stored in a > module so that I know which function I am currently in. I am > attempting to write a > backend that targets a language that only allows integer function > names and I

Is there a way to tell LLVM to treat Boolean results as 32bit values instead of 1 bit values? Thanks, Micah Villmow Systems Engineer Advanced Technology & Performance Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 4555 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara, CA. 95054 P: 408-572-6219 F: 408-572-6596 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am having trouble trying to figure out two pieces of information from attempting to map arguments to registers. How do I determine, based on the argument name, which register the value is supposed to be assigned to? I can hard-coded it currently and it will be correct 100% of the time with the current set of assumptions, but I would rather determine it dynamically so that I can change my

I am not sure what you are looking to do. Please provide a mark up example. Evan On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > Is there currently a way to use a pattern inside of another pattern? > > Micah Villmow > Systems Engineer > Advanced Technology & Performance > Advanced Micro Devices Inc. > 4555 Great America Pkwy, > Santa Clara, CA. 95054 > P:

I am attemping to figure out how to access the function names that are stored in a module so that I know which function I am currently in. I am attempting to write a backend that targets a language that only allows integer function names and I need to create mapping between the string and the integer. I've looked in the header files but I cannot determine how to extract the function

Is there currently a way to have virtual register allocation information be saved across functions so that if I create a new virtual register in a function that it doesn't use a virtual register allocated in any previous function? Thanks, Micah Villmow Systems Engineer Advanced Technology & Performance Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 4555 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara, CA. 95054