similar to: [LLVMdev] bc file not for Windows? Is this feature planed?

Dale Johannesen schrieb: > On Sep 17, 2008, at 2:36 PMPDT, Michael Reichenbach wrote: >> No matter if I try " >> llvm-g++ a.cpp -c -emit-llvm >> " with "LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End Binaries for Mingw32/x86" on Windows XP >> or if I am trying it on Ubuntu... >> >> Only the a.o file will be created without any error messages. The .bc >>

Hello Michael, If you're just trying to run the code you can skip the llc and gcc states and go directly to lli. PowerPC and Intel x86 are the only architectures supported by the jit compiler right now but it should work fine from Windows. The C output backend needs some work since C isn't a low-level language enough to compile the abstractions of LLVM Assembly code. --Sam Crow --- On

question about: http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#translatec++ "With llvm-gcc3, this will generate program and program.bc." Is this llvm-gcc3 only out of date of is it really only llvm-gcc3? I have 'llvm-g++ (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5546) (LLVM build)' installed on Ubuntu and followed that guide and it creates indeed no .bc file. Regards, -mr

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Reichenbach <michael_reichenbach at freenet.de> wrote: > question about: > http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#translatec++ > "With llvm-gcc3, this will generate program and program.bc." > > Is this llvm-gcc3 only out of date of is it really only llvm-gcc3? Those instructions are out of date; the current version of llvm-gcc

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Michael Reichenbach <michael_reichenbach at freenet.de> wrote: > program.c will contain some non-human generated code. But it doesn't > compile with gcc. There is an error, gcc complaints about undefined > reference to std::cout and such (the code was just a very small example > with cout). > > It hasn't be converted into "C

Hi It would be pretty useful to have syslinux in linux kernel format so it can be chainloaded easy and directly by other bootloaders such as grub4dos. related topics: http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=7013 http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=6119&view=findpost&p=59236

Eli Friedman schrieb: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Reichenbach > <michael_reichenbach at freenet.de> wrote: >> question about: >> http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#translatec++ >> "With llvm-gcc3, this will generate program and program.bc." >> >> Is this llvm-gcc3 only out of date of is it really only llvm-gcc3? > > Those

Eli Friedman schrieb: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Michael Reichenbach > <michael_reichenbach at freenet.de> wrote: >> program.c will contain some non-human generated code. But it doesn't >> compile with gcc. There is an error, gcc complaints about undefined >> reference to std::cout and such (the code was just a very small example >> with cout).

Please bare with me. :) Just to ensure I got nothing wrong. I can write in C++ + use C++ std lib + use other C++ libs and see if it compiles with a C++ compiler. After it's working I use llvm to do some magic and I get C code that I can compile with a standard C compiler on any platform? That's what I planed to do. Regards, -mr

Hi! When the 1.0 release is planed?

On Sep 17, 2008, at 2:36 PMPDT, Michael Reichenbach wrote: > > No matter if I try " > llvm-g++ a.cpp -c -emit-llvm > " with "LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End Binaries for Mingw32/x86" on Windows XP > or if I am trying it on Ubuntu... > > Only the a.o file will be created without any error messages. The .bc > file will not be created, do you know why? -emit-llvm

Hi, All, I follow the menu http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html , but still failed to build LLVM debug version. Here's error message: 7>C:\study\llvm\projects\compiler-rt\lib\asan\asan_win.cc(69): fatal error C1189: #error : Please build the runtime with a non-debug CRT: /MD or /MT Any idear? -- Best Regards, Amy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html (Getting Started with the LLVM

I verified the patch and it compiles all the targets, both in Debug and Release modes. If there is no someone else to keep the MSVC projects files updated, I will try from time to time to update them and to add the new targets. Maybe a note must be put in "docs/GettingStartedVS.html" at the Requirements section that llvm needs now MSVC (Express) 2008 to compile. Razvan -----

Richard Smith wrote: > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. > > Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at >

Hi all I cant find a clear answer to this anywhere in the release notes or the mailing list. Sorry, if it is mentioned somewhere and I have missed it. Can someone clarify as to if for LLVM 2.6, cmake is optional. http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html The page says - "This step is currently optional as LLVM does still come with a normal Visual Studio solution file, but it is not

Hello, The documentation on http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html states that > You can run LLVM tests to build the project "check". This phrase seems a bit confusing, I think it would be clearer if formulated something like this: > You can run LLVM tests by merely building the project "check". The > test results will be shown in the VS output window. Thanks,

2008/12/30 srs <skaflotten at gmail.com> > Óscar Fuentes wrote: > > srs <skaflotten at gmail.com> writes: > > > > > >>>> While testing my compiler on win32 in JIT mode, I ran into a couple of > >>>> issues: > >>>> > >>>> 1. I linked the compiler with the lib files resulting from the cmake >

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:07:19PM -0800, xavier wrote: > I was trying to know if LLVM 1.5 works better with VC++ 2003 and to > what extent. This link: > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.5/ > > Referred to in : http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > Is broken LLVM 1.5 hasn't been released yet. :) This is the current work-in-progress that will be

I am following along in http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html with a Hello World bitcode file. I can run the file using the command `lli HelloWorld.bc`, but now I want to link it into an executable file (on windows). The next thing the document says to run is `llc -filetype=obj HelloWorld.bc` which runs fine and now I have a `HelloWorld.obj` file. It's the last step that is giving me some