similar to: [LLVMdev] instruction CE_GEP

Hi Jan, > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one > simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See > this spreadsheet for some rough data: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E the improvement is wonderful! ... > In any case, the patch is attached if

Hi all, I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See this spreadsheet for some rough data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E The change is in how operand ids are encoded in bitcode files. Rather than use an "absolute

Dear Patrice, I have noticed that you are referencing to the Stahnma repository for Spacewalk Client Tools. These are quite old and I would suggest to use the tools from: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum instead. Mr. Suchy already pushed some of the packages to Fedora/EPEL so they might be available there, soon. Besides that the Spacewalk Team is thinking about a split between client/server on

I'm trying to figure out why the presence of a Fortran call affects the result of a floating-point operation. I have C functions void test1(int *n, double *f){ int outC; double c0; c0 = (double) *n * *f; outC = floor(c0); printf("when f computed by R, C says %d by itself\n",outC); } void test2(int *n, double *f){ extern int F77_NAME(ifloor)(double *); int

Chad, Yes it helps, thanks. I have started hacking bitcode-analyzer. ---ajonwa ----- Original Message ----- From: Chad Rosier Sent: 11/05/11 09:07 PM To: ajonwa ajonwa Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Enable Detailed Output llvm-bcanalyzer ajonwa, It will provide some of the information you're seeking, but not all. Here's a partial dump from one of the bitcode test cases:

Hello, I have a loop with 1000 repetitions which includes OR computation of an exposure factor and outcome. I compute OR like this: t<-table(exposure,outcome) oddsratio(t)$measure["estimate"] This gives me the estimates for exposure=0 and exposure=1 but exposure=0 is the reference group and i need only the estimate for exposure=1. I specified a matrix OR with 3 columns (for OR

Hi, Could someone help with coding this in R? I need to select one row per patient i in clinic j. The data is organized similar to that shown below. Two columns - patient i in column j identify each unique patient. There are two columns on outcome. Some patients have multiple rows with each row representing one visit, coded for in the column, visit. Some patients have just one row indicating

Commit-ID: 8ce54e2a6adb82cbbb988e1f335fa5ebf370f6c5 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=8ce54e2a6adb82cbbb988e1f335fa5ebf370f6c5 Author: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder at gmail.com> AuthorDate: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:20:29 +0800 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:43:24 +0200 [klibc] [OUTPUT] Make outc an inline

Peter Zotov писал 09.01.2013 19:59: > Hello. > > I've managed to create a bitcode file (attached; also available at > [1]) which produces > a series of identical errors when verified: > > | Global variable initializer type does not match global variable > type! > | %i.NilClass* @nil > > When ran through llvm-dis and recompiled, through, it verifies >

Hello. I've managed to create a bitcode file (attached; also available at [1]) which produces a series of identical errors when verified: | Global variable initializer type does not match global variable type! | %i.NilClass* @nil When ran through llvm-dis and recompiled, through, it verifies successfully. If I disassemble it one more time, the result is identical to the first

I tried to add a isel pattern [(set I32Regs:$dest, (select (seteq I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op1), I32Regs:$op3, I32Regs:$op4))] for my instruction. I get an error message "Could not infer all types in a pattern!" Above the error message it prints error message line containing the name of my op and (set I32Regs:i32:$dest, (select:i32 (setcc:{i1:i8:i16:i32:i64} I32Regs:i32:$op1,

I have a new problem: Register RBP is used in a function foo. (I am not allocating RBP to any virtual register, the instances of RBP in function foo are in the machine code when my register allocator starts.) Function foo calls function bar. Register RBP is not saved across the call, though it is live after the call. Function bar includes a virtual register. The code that I'm using to

On Aug 19, 2008, at 13:36, kirill havok wrote: > I got very interested in LLVM project, and I decided to start > writing my own scripting language based on it. By studying the > documentation, I could not find how to call external function, > written in C. That is, I have a set of functions written in C/C++, I > generate code, using LLVM C++ interface, how can I call(or

Hello, I got very interested in LLVM project, and I decided to start writing my own scripting language based on it. By studying the documentation, I could not find how to call external function, written in C. That is, I have a set of functions written in C/C++, I generate code, using LLVM C++ interface, how can I call(or register in machine in run-time) my external functions? Maybe I just missed

Hi all, How can I create an llvm::GetElementPtrInst in which the pointer and the index are in registers previously loaded with llvm::LoadInst ? I mean, the generated instruction will be like this: %1 = getelementptr i8* %myreg1, i32 %myreg2 here, %myreg1 and %myreg2 are previously created by load instructions (llvm::LoadInst). Please, let me know if there is an example of something similar.

Commit-ID: e4610e5e04a3292a48a239be366e7767b64ffdcb Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=e4610e5e04a3292a48a239be366e7767b64ffdcb Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:19:25 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] [BUILTIN] Handle

Commit-ID: 27d0e9f3b74b25e5d2c9f366074edb77b9ef5f9f Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=27d0e9f3b74b25e5d2c9f366074edb77b9ef5f9f Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:19:25 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: [BUILTIN]

I wrote in a few weeks ago about writing an independent implementation of Bitcode and updating the docs to be more complete. Attached is a patch to docs/BitCodeFormat.html that adds a lot of information that was previously only available by reading the source code. It also corrects some errors. Josh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am not sure if this is a bug in FOP (Flash Operator Panel), a configuration error on my part or a bug in Asterisk. I am using Asterisk 1.2.5 and Zaptel 1.2.4 on a Centos 4.2 server with Linux version 2.6.9-22-EL-i686. Kernel updates are excluded and the server has been updated using 'yum -y update'. Okay here is the scenario: I am using AgentCallBackLogin as an extension in my

This is an issue I went round and round about a while ago, but did not have time to resolve. I posted this at linuxquestions.org, but this is really a wine issue. Forgive me for posting a subject that was once discussed at length as I've lost the responces people sent. I have Slackware 10.0 running, and have used for quite a while. I run the Windows Half-Life OP4 server using wine. To start