similar to: [LLVMdev] Proposed modification of AsmPrinter::EmitConstantValueOnly()

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Proposed modification of AsmPrinter::EmitConstantValueOnly()"

2002 Sep 26
2
[LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction
You are correct, ubyte 2 simply means 3rd element of the structure. This quantity is always constant (it specifies the field number), so we could have used any signed or unsigned integer type for it instead of ubyte. UByte means we are limited to at most 256 structure fields but it also makes the bytecode representation more compact. (To remove this restriction, we may migrate to UInt in the
2006 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] print ".weak" directive
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote: > The attached patch makes the ASM printer print the ".weak" directive > when a weak symbol is added to a constant pool. > > I need something similar to it in order to bootstrap gcc on ARM. --- lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.cpp 7 Dec 2006 01:30:31 -0000 1.120 +++ lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.cpp 7 Dec 2006 13:00:17 -0000 @@
2006 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] print ".weak" directive
The attached patch makes the ASM printer print the ".weak" directive when a weak symbol is added to a constant pool. I need something similar to it in order to bootstrap gcc on ARM. Any comments? Best Regards, Rafael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1816 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2007 Feb 26
3
PLotting R graphics/symbols without user x-y scaling
Is it possible to add lines or other user defined graphics to a plot in R that does not depend on the user scale for the plot? For example I have a plot plot(x,y) and I want to add some graphic that is scaled in inches or cm but I do not want the graphic to change when the x-y scales are changed - like a thermometer, scale bar or other symbol - How does one do this? I want to build my own
2002 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Another question about GetElementPtr Instruction
Hi, I've another question about getelementptr. So, in the twisted mind of my little pass, I have a statement like this: %reg228-mod = getelementptr %struct.SimpleStruct* %N.1, long 0 ; <%struct.SimpleStruct*> [#uses=2] I'm not sure of the semantics of %a = getelementptr %b, long 0. I want to think that it is some kind of weird identity (no-op), judging from the operand
2010 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] nested GEP in a static initializer fails
Hi, Given this LLVM assembly: @a = global i8* getelementptr (i8* null, i64 mul (i64 ptrtoint (i32* getelementptr (i32* null, i32 1) to i64), i64 2)) llc fails an assertion: llc: /home/jdenny/llvm-svn/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:202: typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X = llvm::ConstantInt, Y = llvm::Value*]: Assertion `isa<X>(Val)
2002 Sep 25
3
[LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction
I have a question about GetElementPtr. Suppose I have an GetElementPtr Instruction GI: %reg = getelementptr %ST* %s, uint 1, ubyte 2, ubyte 1, uint 5, uint 13 I want to check if this is the reference of a component of a structure, how can I do that? Should I check which operand of this instruction is 'ubyte' type? How can I do that in code? should I use ubyte *a =
2006 Mar 27
5
Alarm on Unicall
Hi all, any body can tell me why i am receiving this message in my sever ? I have running * with 10 Digital Lines, but i am receiving a lot of times this message . Is a software issue or is a hardware issue ? Regards. Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:2672 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 event Alarm Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3091 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 Alarm masks
2017 Jan 29
2
[Bug 2672] New: Typo with dynamically removing port forward
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2672 Bug ID: 2672 Summary: Typo with dynamically removing port forward Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: Other URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug /1421075 OS: Linux Status: NEW
2006 Nov 24
1
mfcr/R2
Hello! I'm tryuing to bring up an R2 connection but eventhough I've followed the guidelines in: http://zarzamora.com.mx/asterisk/17 something seems to be missing. When an incomming call is generated I get: Nov 24 06:01:17 WARNING[-197416016]: chan_unicall.c:612 unicall_report: MFC/R2 UniCall/24 <- 0001 [1/ 1/Idle /Idle ] Nov 24 06:01:17 WARNING[-197416016]:
2011 Apr 06
0
Proposed modification to decompose() and plot.decomposed.ts()
The decompose() function truncates the seasonal component unnecessarily. I've modified the function to fix this problem, and also added the original data to the object returned (to enable better plotting). I've also modified the plot.decomposed.ts() function so that it plots the original data in the top panel rather than the reconstructed data. The difference between the two is that the
2018 Feb 24
3
Regression Tree Questions
Hi All, I'm a newbie and have two questions. Please pardon me if they are very basic. 1. I'm using a regression tree to predict the selling prices of 10 new records (homes). The following code is resulting in an error message: pred <- predict(model, newdata = outOfSample[, -6]) The error message is: Error in model.frame.default(Terms, newdata, na.action = na.action, xlev =
2010 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] nested GEP in a static initializer fails
Joel E. Denny wrote: > Hi, > > Given this LLVM assembly: > > @a = global i8* getelementptr (i8* null, i64 mul (i64 ptrtoint (i32* getelementptr (i32* null, i32 1) to i64), i64 2)) > > llc fails an assertion: > > llc: /home/jdenny/llvm-svn/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:202: typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X =
2010 Apr 19
1
Follow up on installing formatR...
Good morning folks: Made a second go at installing this and succeeded, but with some strange behaviours along the way. First the system back story. Using up to date edition Ubuntu 8.04 Using up to date edition of R 2.10.1 Using the Toronto, Ontario repository to draw from. After the first attempt ended up with two of the four dependencies installed so only the Rgtk related items would be
2009 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] proposed new rule for getelementptr
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 13:30, Dan Gohman wrote: > - A pointer value formed by a ptrtoint is associated with all address > ranges of all pointer values that contribute (directly or > indirectly) to the computation of the pointer's value. Do you mean inttoptr here? And that "all pointer values that contribute (directly or indirectly) to the computation of the
2008 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > > Duncan Sands wrote: > > > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable > > > (and shows the problem). > > > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some > >
2003 Apr 14
1
New 4port FXS
Well, I got my nice new 4 port FXS card this afternoon, and with all my other asterisk problems, decided now was a good time to throw it in.... So far, I have dropped it in, done a clean cvs checkout on zapata, zaptel, asterisk, make clean and make install on each. I can load the wcfxs module which finds the card (though one time it failed the register check and locked the machine up, a hard
2010 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] VMkit AOT build problem: llc crushed on glibj compilation to native(.s) file
Hi, Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java, building for that classpath glibj.zip: $ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER=1 has eventually, after 50 minutes, brought: <<< llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip to llvm llvm[0]: Optimizing glibj.zip llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip.bc to native UNREACHABLE executed! 0 llc
2009 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] proposed new rule for getelementptr
On Jul 22, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on refining the definition of getelementptr (GEP) to > clarify its semantics and to allow front-ends to provide additional > information to optimization passes. It would be quite valuable to have cleaner semantics for GEPs, both for LLVM in general and for the memory safety work we have been doing in
2009 Jul 22
16
[LLVMdev] proposed new rule for getelementptr
Hello, I'm working on refining the definition of getelementptr (GEP) to clarify its semantics and to allow front-ends to provide additional information to optimization passes. To help support this, I'd like to propose the following rule: Any memory access must be done though a pointer value associated with with address range of the memory access, otherwise the behavior is undefined.