You are correct, ubyte 2 simply means 3rd element of the structure. This quantity is always constant (it specifies the field number), so we could have used any signed or unsigned integer type for it instead of ubyte. UByte means we are limited to at most 256 structure fields but it also makes the bytecode representation more compact. (To remove this restriction, we may migrate to UInt in the future and use some kind of Zipf encoding to avoid increasing bytecode size in the common case.) There is a routine TargetData::GetIndexedOffset to convert any ptr + index list to the actual byte offset for a particular target machine. See llvm/include/Target/TargetData.h. --Vikram> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu]On > Behalf Of Brian R. Gaeke > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:55 AM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction > > > > Dear LLVMdev, > > As far as I can tell, what the "ubyte 2" value really means is the > 2+1'th member of the structure...regardless of whether that structure's > 3rd element actually starts at (pointer to structure) + 3*sizeof(ubyte) > or not. So, is there any semantic connection between "ubyte" as > used in structure accesses and what getelementptr actually interprets > it as? Or is it just called ubyte for fun? > > -"Confused in Urbana", Brian > > > I have a question about GetElementPtr. > > > > Suppose I have an GetElementPtr Instruction GI: > > > > %reg = getelementptr %ST* %s, uint 1, ubyte 2, ubyte 1, uint > > 5, uint 13 > > -- > gaeke at uiuc.edu > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
Brian R. Gaeke
2002-Sep-27 22:18 UTC
[LLVMdev] Another question about GetElementPtr Instruction
Hi, I've another question about getelementptr. So, in the twisted mind of my little pass, I have a statement like this: %reg228-mod = getelementptr %struct.SimpleStruct* %N.1, long 0 ; <%struct.SimpleStruct*> [#uses=2] I'm not sure of the semantics of %a = getelementptr %b, long 0. I want to think that it is some kind of weird identity (no-op), judging from the operand type and the result type that is printed out by llvm. In this sense I suppose it is like saying a = &(b[0]) (== b). I couldn't quite make it out from reading the language reference. So I want to go ahead and transform uses of %reg228-mod by replacing them with uses of %N.1, in this example. Is this right or am I way off? Thanks for any help, -Brian> You are correct, ubyte 2 simply means 3rd element of the structure. This > quantity is always constant (it specifies the field number), so we could > have used any signed or unsigned integer type for it instead of ubyte. > UByte means we are limited to at most 256 structure fields but it also makes > the bytecode representation more compact. (To remove this restriction, we > may migrate to UInt in the future and use some kind of Zipf encoding to > avoid increasing bytecode size in the common case.) > > There is a routine TargetData::GetIndexedOffset to convert any ptr + index > list to the actual byte offset for a particular target machine. See > llvm/include/Target/TargetData.h. > > --Vikram > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu]On > > Behalf Of Brian R. Gaeke > > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:55 AM > > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction > > > > > > > > Dear LLVMdev, > > > > As far as I can tell, what the "ubyte 2" value really means is the > > 2+1'th member of the structure...regardless of whether that structure's > > 3rd element actually starts at (pointer to structure) + 3*sizeof(ubyte) > > or not. So, is there any semantic connection between "ubyte" as > > used in structure accesses and what getelementptr actually interprets > > it as? Or is it just called ubyte for fun? > > > > -"Confused in Urbana", Brian > > > > > I have a question about GetElementPtr. > > > > > > Suppose I have an GetElementPtr Instruction GI: > > > > > > %reg = getelementptr %ST* %s, uint 1, ubyte 2, ubyte 1, uint > > > 5, uint 13 > > > > -- > > gaeke at uiuc.edu > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-- gaeke at uiuc.edu
Vikram S. Adve
2002-Sep-28 05:40 UTC
[LLVMdev] RE: Another question about GetElementPtr Instruction
That's correct, X = getElementPtr <Ty>* ptr, long 0 is a NOP. It does exactly what you said: X = &b[0]. X = getElementPtr <Ty>* ptr is a NOP too. --Vikram ------------------------------------------------------------------------- VIKRAM S. ADVE Assistant Professor E-MAIL: vadve at cs.uiuc.edu Department of Computer Science PHONE: (217) 244-2016 Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign FAX: (217) 244-6869 1304 W. Springfield Ave. WWW: http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve Urbana IL 61801-2987. -------------------------------------------------------------------------> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian R. Gaeke [mailto:gaeke at uiuc.edu] > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:17 PM > To: Vikram S. Adve > Cc: Brian R. Gaeke; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Another question about GetElementPtr Instruction > > > > Hi, > > I've another question about getelementptr. So, in the twisted > mind of my little > pass, I have a statement like this: > > %reg228-mod = getelementptr %struct.SimpleStruct* %N.1, long 0 > ; <%struct.SimpleStruct*> [#uses=2] > > I'm not sure of the semantics of %a = getelementptr %b, long 0. I want to > think that it is some kind of weird identity (no-op), judging > from the operand > type and the result type that is printed out by llvm. In this > sense I suppose > it is like saying a = &(b[0]) (== b). I couldn't quite make it > out from reading > the language reference. > > So I want to go ahead and transform uses of %reg228-mod by > replacing them with > uses of %N.1, in this example. Is this right or am I way off? > > Thanks for any help, > > -Brian > > > > > You are correct, ubyte 2 simply means 3rd element of the > structure. This > > quantity is always constant (it specifies the field number), so we could > > have used any signed or unsigned integer type for it instead of ubyte. > > UByte means we are limited to at most 256 structure fields but > it also makes > > the bytecode representation more compact. (To remove this > restriction, we > > may migrate to UInt in the future and use some kind of Zipf encoding to > > avoid increasing bytecode size in the common case.) > > > > There is a routine TargetData::GetIndexedOffset to convert any > ptr + index > > list to the actual byte offset for a particular target machine. See > > llvm/include/Target/TargetData.h. > > > > --Vikram > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu]On > > > Behalf Of Brian R. Gaeke > > > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:55 AM > > > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear LLVMdev, > > > > > > As far as I can tell, what the "ubyte 2" value really means is the > > > 2+1'th member of the structure...regardless of whether that > structure's > > > 3rd element actually starts at (pointer to structure) + > 3*sizeof(ubyte) > > > or not. So, is there any semantic connection between "ubyte" as > > > used in structure accesses and what getelementptr actually interprets > > > it as? Or is it just called ubyte for fun? > > > > > > -"Confused in Urbana", Brian > > > > > > > I have a question about GetElementPtr. > > > > > > > > Suppose I have an GetElementPtr Instruction GI: > > > > > > > > %reg = getelementptr %ST* %s, uint 1, ubyte 2, ubyte 1, uint > > > > 5, uint 13 > > > > > > -- > > > gaeke at uiuc.edu > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > -- > gaeke at uiuc.edu >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction
- [LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction
- [LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction
- [LLVMdev] [fwd] Re: LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
- [LLVMdev] Two important changes to the getelementptr instruction