similar to: [LLVMdev] Errors building llvm

> Hi, > > I am trying to build LLVM on x86 Windows platform with Cygwin and get an > error building lib/Support/APInt.cpp. I get the same errors using gcc 3.4.2 > and 3.4.4. The log is attached. Please advice. Thanks. I encountered this issue also when building LLVM on Cygwin. I modified /usr/include/stdint.h to change int32_t and unit32_t from long's to int's. So the

Hi, Chris > Can you please send in a patch so we can fix this on mainline? This known problem: stdint.h on cygwin declares {u}int32_t type to be 'long', not 'int'. And this causes problems with APInt's uint32_t => unsigned casts. I myself don't know good direct fix except patching Cygwin's stdint.h itself. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of

Hello, Well theres not too much to it. A patch for Cygwin's stdint.h. And a patch for lib/System/Unix/Program.inc. Despite Cygwin complaining of timing errors both LLVM and LLVM-GCC4 compile ok'ish. make[2]: Warning: File `/dev/null' has modification time 0.0096 s in the future make[2]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. I am getting this on both

> Please just use #ifdef _CYGWIN_ Okay >> Regarding the Bytecode writer stuff. I will try adding some inline >> dis-ambiguator functions. > > Yeah, I can't help you solve this problem because I don't have your > environment or compiler. However, this really smells like a compiler or > stdint.h bug to me. This code compiles fine on many unix platforms and

Hi, I was just wondering if it is possible to debug a live Xen domain with mdb i.e. use mdb on a running domain? I know that it is possible to debug a domain with mdb using a crash dump. I couldn''t find anything about using mdb on a live domain though so I thought I''d ask here. -Padraig This message posted from opensolaris.org

On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 21:42 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > Okay I have put a #ifdef HAVE_RLIMIT_RSS round the RSS code. > > There needs to be logic added to config system to complement this. > > Or shall I just use an #ifdef _CYGWIN_ ? Please just use #ifdef _CYGWIN_ > > Regarding the Bytecode writer stuff. I will try adding some inline > dis-ambiguator functions. Yeah,

/usr/sfw/bin/firefox is a shell script which calls run-mozilla.sh which calls firebox-bin. Is there a way to call dapptrace on firefox in order to trace firefox-bin? This message posted from opensolaris.org

I'm trying to install llvm on my windows development box and hit a problem I'm using cygwin cygwin% gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) I downloaded both the top of tree via svn I ran ./configure make make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/llvm/lib/Support' llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Debug build llvm[1]: Compiling APInt.cpp

Rubin, Norman wrote: > I'm trying to install llvm on my windows development box and hit a > problem > I'm using cygwin > cygwin% gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) > > I downloaded both the top of tree via svn > I ran ./configure > make > > make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/llvm/lib/Support' >

I've filed a bug for aarch64 https://github.com/xiph/speexdsp/issues/7 and provided the port in a fork with a pull request. We need someone to review/merge in the pull request? It provides the source code, but my testing was under Android builds, so there would be some configure changes needed to build it stand alone. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Frank Barchard <fbarchard at

Hi all, I build successfully with speex-1.2rc2. And with speexdsp 1.2rc3, I build with i386, X86_64, armv7 and armv7s all passed. But when I build for ARM64 (for iPhone 6), it failed with: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make all-recursive Making all in libspeexdsp CC preprocess.lo CC jitter.lo CC mdf.lo CC fftwrap.lo CC

Dear all. I built the LLVM 3.0 rc4 with Clang front-end in windows os env. (also with -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=all option) For arm neon intrinsics testing, I tried to compile some codes, which are included a few neon intrinsics. Although I got a well done bitcode on ubuntu build pc, it shows some errors when compile the codes on windows. Could you let me know why occurred errors? is this just a

Hi Eric, Could you explain the intent and policy regarding the test-suite body of code. Should the test be left as much as possible as-is (even if technically incorrect)? Should changes only affect the XCore target (#ifdef) or should all targets get the changes? Taking "int32_t main" as an example. The correct return type & argc for main is 'int'. In the XCore tool chain,

Hello, I am trying to run this test program via JIT on my Mac (10.7.1) where I have compiled the latest LLVM code for 32-bit and it is not working properly. Running the same code against LLVM 2.9 works fine. I also tried recompiling my same checkout of LLVM as 64-bit and re-compiled my test program and that works fine, for some reason the 32-bit version is yielding unexpected behavior. I believe

Does 'nounwind' have semantics that inform optimization passes? It seems to in some cases, but not consistently. For example... int32_t foo(int32_t* ptr) { int i = 0; int result; do { bar(ptr); result = *ptr; bar(ptr); } while (i++ < *ptr); return result; } Say we have a front end that declares bar as... declare void @bar(i32*) readonly; So 'bar' is

From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha at ti.com> I optimized Speex resampler for NEON capable ARM CPUs. The first patch should speed up resampling on any platform that can spare the increased memory usage. It would be nice to have these merged to the master branch. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help the the merge. The patches have been rebased on top of master branch in

* Richard W.M. Jones: > diff --git a/lib/hivex.c b/lib/hivex.c > index e3c1e05..9351ac5 100644 > --- a/lib/hivex.c > +++ b/lib/hivex.c > @@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ hivex_value_value (hive_h *h, hive_value_h value, > if (h->msglvl >= 2) > fprintf (stderr, "hivex_value_value: warning: big data block is not " > "valid

Hello, Depending on how I extract integer lanes from an x86_64 xmm register, the backend may spill that register in order to load scalars. The effect was observed on two targets: corei7-avx and btver1 (I haven't checked other targets). Here's a test case with spilling/no-spilling code put on conditional compile: #if __SSE4_1__ != 0 #include <smmintrin.h> #else #include

>>> Linfeng Zhang <linfengz at google.com> schrieb am 06.06.2017 um 06:46 in Nachricht <CAKoqLCAfj+fDUMLfN4dLNSZ4NNAZpaSt_BWZRp+7XBqfhiSqiQ at mail.gmail.com>: > Hi Jean-Marc, > > I tried "==" before, and it failed when both results are 0.0. Maybe the > exponent or sign has difference because of the different 0.0 representation > in NEON. If anybody

Hello, The following two patches add an additional offset part in the FB resize event. Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel