similar to: [LLVMdev] gfortran bugs filed

Dear all, In our compiler we use a modified version LLVM Polly, which is very sensitive to proper code generation. Among the number of limitations, the loop region (enclosed by phi node on induction variable and branch) is required to be free of additional memory-dependent branches. In other words, there must be no conditional "br" instructions below phi nodes. The problem we are facing

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, As a small means of community service, I've decided to provide an unofficial patched version of 3.0.24 (tagged as 3.0.24-gc-1) to address the CVE-2007-2444, CVE-2007-2446, and CVE-2007-2447 security advisories. The bzr branch is hosted at http://people.samba.org/bzr/jerry/samba-3-0-24-gc.bzr/ The source tarball is available from

I have been trying to do a nls model and gives me the error of a nonnumeric argument table(file="c:/tt2.txt",header=T) > fit.model <- nls(TT~60*(1+alpha*(v/c)^beta),data=tt2, start=list(alpha=1, beta=3, v=1000)) Error in v/c : non-numeric argument to binary operator > is.numeric(tt2) [1] FALSE > is.character(tt2) [1] FALSE > as.numeric(tt2) Error: (list)

Hi Sam, do you know if there is anything done about cbb(4)? I have many wireless adapters with ath(4), but only the one based on PCMCIA is making problems on FreeBSD. I cannot boot my notebook with the device inserted into the port, or it will render the system unusable (100% load on cbb(4)). And all I can see is the following: Jul 12 14:58:39 link kernel: ath0: ath_chan_set: unable to reset

Is there a way to execute specific applications at Asterisk startup (like "startup context" or something)?

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2443 Bug ID: 2443 Summary: Bugs intended to be fixed for OpenSSH 7.1 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: meta Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous

Hi all, Two questions: 1. Is there a way to evaluate models from lmer() with a poisson distribution? I get the following error message: library(lme4) lmer(tot.fruit~infl.treat+def.treat+(1|initial.size),family=poisson)->model plot(fitted(model),resid(model)) Error: 'resid' is not implemented yet Are there any other options? 2. Why doesn't the function estimable() in gmodels

Can dtrace help with collecting any of the following, in otherwords are there any existing counters to be exploited, or am I going to have to make my own custom Solaris build with additional counters... currently I can get this detailed trap information from our SPARC simulator, for example here are some ints-per-sec during a benchmark-of-interest: sending-source

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.msbb.uc.edu> wrote: > Chris and Bill, > I have tested the proposed patch from... > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html > > under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems building gfortran > from llvm svn. The resulting compiler works fine so can we get that > patch

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:38:30PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.msbb.uc.edu> wrote: > > Chris and Bill, > > I have tested the proposed patch from... > > > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html > > > > under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've posted an updated version of my 3.0.24-gc dev branch to deal with the break in "force group" caused by the CVE-2007-2444 patch and backported the Vista related bug fixes from the Samba patches page. The bzr branch is hosted at http://people.samba.org/bzr/jerry/samba-3-0-24-gc.bzr/ The source tarball is available from

First of all, if Asterisk is the client and it must register to the other side, does the peer\user entry have to be in sip.conf, or can it be in ARA? Second, why do all calls fall through to the last context specified, whether in that peer\user definition or not? I'm assuming it's a typo somewhere, but I can't find it. I had a full sip.conf, but axed a lot of the fluff trying to

Hi Folks, Currently i am using samba version 2.5. Now the following patches for security vulnerabilities are available on the samba.org... http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/security/samba-3.0.24-CVE-2007-2444.patch http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/security/samba-3.0.24-CVE-2007-2446.patch http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/security/samba-3.0.24-CVE-2007-2447.patch But these

Chris and Bill, I have tested the proposed patch from... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems building gfortran from llvm svn. The resulting compiler works fine so can we get that patch in before 2.4 is release? Jack ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm svn. I find

If there are any other users who use AHRQ's SAS code comoanaly2010 and comformat2010 to create comorbidity variables, I thought you might be interested in the following PRELIM code we wrote to mimic its functionality in R. It seems to yield similar results, but may contain errors. Please feel free to comment (kindly) or enhance. I'm sure there are better ways to skin this cat, but we at

Hello, I have a Centos 4.4 Linux server that setup Winbind with windows 2003AD integration, the winbind suddenly can't receive AD accounts, I can use wbinfo -u to show AD user name and group etc, but getent passwd isn't pulling across all of the domain accounts. Here is the winbind log: [2007/10/04 23:31:08, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_fill_pwent(50) error getting user id

I am trying to do some research on two Samba Vulnerabilities; Samba MS-RPC Request Parsing Heap Buffer Overflows (CVE-2007-2446) and Samba Remote Command Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2007-2447). In reading the documentation for these vulnerabilities, it appears that the available patches, to fix the problems, are for version 3.0.24. I am currently running version 3.0.21, on Solaris 10. Does that

List, I'm working on fitting a logistic model for a well known dataset (which is given below in case anyone wants to try to reproduce). I used both R and SAS to fit the model and have some differences in the parameter estimates. I'm wondering if R calculates the ML estimates differently. I'm making NO accusations as to which program is "right or wrong". That is not the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1288 Tom Ueltschi <bugzilla.mindrot.org at ueltschi.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.mindrot.org at ueltsch | |i.net ---

Full_Name: Emmanuel Charpentier Version: 1.2.0 OS: Linux 2.2.18 (Debian 2.2) Submission from: (NULL) (193.251.31.31) When trying "mass" installation of available packages, the package logspline does not compile, at least when installed through install.packages("logspline"). It seems that it is a small bug, such a missing #include <math.h> or -libm linking switch ?