similar to: [LLVMdev] newbie with pass registering Problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] newbie with pass registering Problem"

2008 Apr 22
1
[LLVMdev] newbie with pass registering Problem
Hi!! This is my first time with llvm. I'm still learning and really need help. I wrote only one Function Pass, which uses another Function Pass (blockNrs), and registered this: RegisterPass<FunctionAnalysis> X("gasched", "Genom Scheduling Pass"); When I compile my sourcecode, everything was okay. But when I tried to test it, i got this error Message: nicole at
2008 Apr 22
6
bandwidth limiting - vif "rate" option
Hello everybody, i have found, that i can limit the OUTGOING bandwidth with the option "rate=" (e.g. rate=250KB/s) at the vif line in my sxp-file. I have tested it, it is working good, but why it is "only" limiting the outgoing bandwidth ? Is there any easy way to limit the incoming bandwidth too, something like the obove option ? My network setup is bridged. Thank you in
2008 Feb 14
5
On an eight cpu system domU ''cap'' can only be set to 100
On a 8 Core system only dom0 can set cap > 100 and vcpus > 1. On a domU ''xm sched-credit -d <domU> -c 200'' says "Error: cap is out of range". Vcpu cannot be set higher than 1 - regardless of boot/config/command line. Low performance is equivalent to the cap setting. See ''xm list --long'': (domain (domid 0) (uuid
2008 Sep 09
3
sort by value fails
hi all, i want use sort_by_value to sort by "username". so in the indexing process i add the value i want sort by as value (lang is php) $document->add_value(0, 'value'); when i sort i got all specialchars at the beginning ? ? ? alf the values be indexed as utf8. what do i wrong? any suggestions? regards, sven
2008 Feb 08
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Hi, I tried to figure out what the problem is -- but it seems to be totally different from what I expected. My status at the moment is: - computing results for "generic" and "Blackfin ASM" versions of the DIV32_16 function are the same, there is no "algorithmic bug" - Instead, there seems some sort of memory corruption: When I comment out the DIV32_16 function
2008 Mar 14
2
Problems with Samba
Hi, I administrate a server (debian etch) on which runs samba, version 3.0.24-6et. Everything worked fine until today. I tried to logon on the server via a clientmachine (win2k, winxp), but i got an error, "System cannot logon because domain not reachable". (it is possible to ping the server and to establish a shortcut (to logon) to the server - that works). I have no idea what
2008 Feb 24
1
Authentication using multiple password schemes
Hi there, I tried to patch the actual Dovecot 1.1 rc1 with the http://dovecot.org/patches/1.1/auth-multi-password.diff. The patch doesn't work for this version and I don't want to get an old version. Is this patch perhaps in the 1.1 rc1version included? I'm not sure because I don't really know how it's to use. I thought about returning some password fields from a database.
2008 Feb 01
0
FW: Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Frank Lorenz a ?crit : > And yes, the same "overflow" happens even when I disable Blackfin ASM > optimizations. Indeed, that shouldn't happen. Just to make sure I understand, so far there's two problems: 1) DIV32_16() in Blackfin assembly causes problems 2) The resampler overflows When you fix/workaround those two, is the encoder/decoder working correctly or are there
2008 May 27
3
mount shares with path
I need to mount a share I don't have direct access to only to one subdirectory. I have no problems mounting other shares on the same windows server with the same permissions. I can mount the volume through gnome "Connect to Server...", but I need it on the filesystem. What is working: smbmount //server1/share1 /mnt -o -fstype=cifs -noperm,credentials=/etc/auto.smb.server1 What is
2008 Feb 22
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Hi Jean-Marc, after some problems with getting svn to work here I finally made it. Problem is, you write that I cannot use libspeex and libspeexdsp at the same time now -- because I use a "live" system (mic-in -> speex_enc -> speex_dec -> headphone out) and I can run the AD1836 audio codec on 48 kHz only, I cannot use my program now (because I use speex resampling...) So I
2007 Oct 12
3
How get DHCP-/BOOTP-Options with MEMDISK
Using PXELINUX and MEMDISK I started a MS-DOS-Diskimage. How can I get the DHCP-Options or BOOTP-Tags from within MS-DOS?? (Like bppatch from 3com.) Thanks! _______________________________________________________________________ Jetzt neu! Sch?tzen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 3 Monate kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220
2008 Mar 05
1
Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Jean-Marc, Frank, I have stumbled across a similar situation regarding optimization. I seem to have a similar setup as Frank does with a fixed 48khz in and out. The wideband mode and ultra-wideband modes are really what I?m looking for. I have a test application that reads audio, downsample to 16kHz (or 32kHz), speex encode, speex decode, upsample back to 48kHz, and playback. If I remove
2008 Feb 12
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Hi, when I compile with FIXED_DEBUG enabled, I get an error -- both when make tries to build testenc.o and when I try to link my app against the speex lib: lorenz@panelmaker:~/Blackfin/tests/speex_loopthrough$ make bfin-uclinux-gcc -c -g -I/home/lorenz/include -o main.o main.c bfin-uclinux-gcc -gl -elf2flt -L/home/lorenz/lib -o speex_through main.o -lspeex_debug -lspeexdsp -lm
2008 Feb 05
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Hi, I just started to examine the DIV32_16 function (Blackfin ASM version), and wondered why the return value of the function inside 'fixed_bfin.h' is of type 'spx_word16_t', but the local variable 'res' which is returned by this function is of type 'spx_word32_t'. Is this a trick of optimization or a bug? (Same question for PDIV32_16 and MAX16, too!) best
2007 Jun 05
0
New Package on Lancet Surveys of Iraq Mortality
Hello, I have placed a package on CRAN about two surveys of mortality in Iraq that were published in the Lancet. http://cran.at.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/lancet.iraqmortality.html > install.packages("lancet.iraqmortality") ... > library(lancet.iraqmortality) Loading required package: foreign > ?lancet.iraqmortality > vignette("mortality") This is
2007 Jun 05
0
New Package on Lancet Surveys of Iraq Mortality
Hello, I have placed a package on CRAN about two surveys of mortality in Iraq that were published in the Lancet. http://cran.at.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/lancet.iraqmortality.html > install.packages("lancet.iraqmortality") ... > library(lancet.iraqmortality) Loading required package: foreign > ?lancet.iraqmortality > vignette("mortality") This is
2005 Jan 24
1
mcnemar.test odds ratios, CI, etc.
Does anyone know of another version of the Mcnemar test that provides: 1. Odds Ratios 2. 95% Confidence intervals of the Odds Ratios 3. Sample probability 4. 95% Confidence intervals of the sample probability Obviously the Odds Ratios and Sample probabilities are easy to calculate from the contingency table, but I would appreciate any help on how to calculate the confidence
2000 Apr 25
2
[R) Bland Altman plot (was: paste ?)
> De : Bill Venables <venables at acland.qld.cmis.csiro.au> > Objet : Re: [R] paste ? > Date?: mardi 25 avril 2000 08:45 > (...) > Secondly, I'm curious about the history of this kind of plot. > I've only heard it called a "Tukey mean difference" plot, (and > Trellis graphics has a function, tmd(), that does it, but no one > knows about it...).
2008 Aug 03
2
Benchmark results
Hey everyone, I hope you guys can help me explaining a pretty strange result that came up when benchmarking a native Red Hat installation against a Xen DomU (installed in a file container). I used lmbench3 on a dualcore AMD-machine. To make the results comparable, I "unplugged" all CPU cores but one in the native installation (setting the "online"-entry to 0). The DomU had
2008 Aug 03
2
Benchmark results
Hey everyone, I hope you guys can help me explaining a pretty strange result that came up when benchmarking a native Red Hat installation against a Xen DomU (installed in a file container). I used lmbench3 on a dualcore AMD-machine. To make the results comparable, I "unplugged" all CPU cores but one in the native installation (setting the "online"-entry to 0). The DomU had