similar to: [LLVMdev] Disabling Verifier

Hi, there. I have two questions about using R to create boxplots. 1. The function boxplot() plots the outliers. How can I label the exact values arount these outlier points? Does R have an option allow me to do that? 2. How can I put two boxplots in one x-y axis? Thanks. Yulei $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Yulei He 276 Grove St. Apt 3 Newton, MA 02466 617-796-7834(H)

Hello, there has been a post to this list somewhere arount april which said that it is possible to use a Sangoma BRI A500 card with zaptel and asterisk bristuff. That is, without sangoma_brid and sangoma_mgd daemons and without woomera channels. Could anybody give me a short hint how to configure this? I tried wanpipe-driver + zaptel + asterisk-bristuffed, but I couldn't get zaptel to

RSpeckers: I''m trying to install this into a Merb-generated RSpec rig: http://code.jeremyevans.net/doc/fixture_dependencies/ It requires inserting their test case into RSpec. This is the documented way to do it: describe ''Post'' do inherit FixtureDependencies::SequelTestCase And that leads to the syntax error in the subject line. (No stack trace is available

After some extra reading about LVM snapshots & Gluster, I think I can conclude it may be a bad idea to use it on big storage bricks. I understood that the LVM maximum metadata, used to store the snapshots data, is about 16GB. So if I have a brick with a volume arount 10TB (for example), daily snapshots, files changing ~100GB : the LVM snapshot is useless. LVM's snapshots doesn't

Rubies: My quest to get the maximum coverage & diagnostics from the leanest possible tests has reached a new level. This is a Rails functional test on an HTML form: user = users(:Moses) get :edit_user, :id => user.id assert_xhtml do form :action => ''/users'' do fieldset do legend ''Personal Information''

Hi Roman, > True. I'm working on the version of the linear scan based on Wimmer's > thesis. It supports live range splitting. I'd like to compare it with > yours. Do you have any good examples of those fairly large functions > that are just flat sequences of instructions, anywhere from 100 to > 10000+ in size??? You can find a couple attached to bug #1512, but I'm

Hi Duraid, > Hi everyone, > > Quick summary: > > LLVM now has a new register allocator particularly suitable for > compiling (very) large, machine-generated functions. Congrats! Very good job! > Longer story: > > I've recently been using LLVM in an application that involves JITing > > fairly large functions that have no control flow - they're

Rubyists: Consider the following monstrosity, coded using assert_select: assert_select "div#logo_box img[src=/0000/0001/logo.gif][alt=My Company]" Now, behold it rewritten to use assert_xhtml: assert_xhtml do div.logo_box! do img :src => /logo.gif$/, :alt => ''My Company'' end end That sample contains more Ruby; it''s not just

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:00 AM Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> wrote: > Let me share my thoughts. Thanks! :) > > > However, as one can see in the video, it takes a pretty long time to > inspect the disk (in order to find the operating system) and to mount the > file systems. > > Do you really need to inspect disk image BEFORE mounting file >

Hi Chris, Your were totally right with your suggestion. I have implemented the code that : a) does not merge multiple TokenFactor nodes in the DAGCombiner::visitTokenFactor(), if the resulting TF node would contain more than 64 operands. b) produces a bunch of TokenFactor nodes with at most 64 operands, instead of one huge TokenFactor in the SelectionDAGLowering::getRoot(). If we have n

Hi, In the LiveIntervalAnalysis::runOnMachineFunction, there is a code to compute the MBB2IdxMap, by remembering for each MBB its start and end instruction numbers: unsigned MIIndex = 0; for (MachineFunction::iterator MBB = mf_->begin(), E = mf_->end(); MBB != E; ++MBB) { unsigned StartIdx = MIIndex; for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB->begin(), E =

Hi I'm seeing something probably related to this. I'm getting an assert from the lower_bound in LiveIntervals::findLiveinMBBs (from a checking std:: VS2005 implementation). Idx2MBBMap has two elements in it, both of which have a .first of 0. (I believe because of an empty MBB in the function below, so StartIndex doesn't advance). scott On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Roman

Can you file a bug so I don't forget? I'm a little occupied right now. But I'll take care of this soon. Evan On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Scott Graham wrote: > Hi > > I'm seeing something probably related to this. I'm getting an assert > from the lower_bound in LiveIntervals::findLiveinMBBs (from a checking > std:: VS2005 implementation). Idx2MBBMap has two

Hi, The checking about that if this is a terminator that it is at the end of the block has been applied twice (bellow). One is at Verifier::visitInstruction, and the other is at Verifier::visitTerminatorInst. Since visitInstruction is called when visiting each instruction, the checking at visitTerminatorInst seems redundant to me. Did I miss any case? void Verifier::visitInstruction(Instruction

Somehow I have ended up with v2.0.2 on my Mac. I am running Leopard so am not sure whether this version came with it. Here are the various versions of components: macfizz$ rails -v Rails 2.0.2 macfizz$ ruby -v ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [universal-darwin9.0] macfizz$ gem -v 1.0.1 macfizz$ Anyway, for various reasons I''m not that happy with 2.0.2 and want to downgrade

> Well, I don't need any information about the operating system itself but ideally, when browsing the disk image the user sees the file system(s) as if the user would have connected (e.g., via ssh) to the guest. So let's say that I browse a disk image with two partitions, the root that is mounted to "/" and another one that is mounted to "/boot". I think it makes

I want to have a message board or forum in my site, I have looked at beast but have no clue how to use svn, and I have had no luck with savage beast either. Can anyone recommend a simple message board/forum that I could plugin and adjust with minimal effort. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are

Hi everyone, Quick summary: LLVM now has a new register allocator particularly suitable for compiling (very) large, machine-generated functions. Longer story: I've recently been using LLVM in an application that involves JITing fairly large functions that have no control flow - they're just flat sequences of instructions, anywhere from 100 to 10000+ in size. (The control flow is

Hi all, We have a problem with our system which is a Siemens PRIMERGY, 8xPentium III Xeon, 8GB Memory, 280GB HD, running as DB2 server. We have some kind of error message like below in /var/log/messages:

>> I had big issues with timeouts until I realize the the imap and mbox format >> isnt a good choice if your users have huge naiboxes. >> At my server there were users with mailboxes arount 700MB to over 1GB. each >> time one of those users checked their email >> the imap server had to open this huge file and parse it, causing I/O issues. >> The only solution I