Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] RFC: CEE Pass"
2008 Jan 27
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: CEE Pass
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Pursuant to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1769 , I'm going to
> remove the CEE pass, which includes the Transforms/Scalar/
> CorrelatedExprs.cpp file. If anyone has any objections to removing
> this pass and/or file, please speak now.
Go for it, thanks!
-Chris
2007 Nov 04
1
[LLVMdev] [Bug 1769] Should remove the -cee pass
On 11/4/07, bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu <bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:
> --- Comment #1 from Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> 2007-11-04 11:45:00 ---
> The release notes say "The -cee pass is known to be buggy, and may be removed
> in a future release.". I think we should just do it.
Oops, I should have read the "known problems" section of
2006 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] Stupid '-load-vn -licm' question (LLVM 1.6)
On Mar 17, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Great. Note that -cee is a beta pass... it has some known bugs and
> isn't planned to be worked on in the immediate future. :(
After a bit of digging, I found one open bug and two failing test
cases, all of which appear to be feature requests:
#217: LLVM needs a generic dominator update mechanism
nullpointer.ll: "a
2006 Mar 17
2
[LLVMdev] Stupid '-load-vn -licm' question (LLVM 1.6)
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Eric Kidd wrote:
>> I'm particularly confused by the rlwinm instructions that keep turning up
>> in PowerPC output, and the double test against 98. I don't have a problem
>> or anything; I'm just trying to figure out what's going on. :-)
>
> Ah! The backend is running -lowerswitch, which does a binary search of the
> case labels
2004 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this
mail list?
Now results.
Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended.
New regressions:
Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS
Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL ,
expected PASS
Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL
2004 Aug 06
3
ices 0.3 released
* Arc <arc@indymedia.org> shaped the electrons to say...
> > I quite agree - it's frustrating to be able to use software that's
> > almost there, then have all the development move to a format that 90%
> > of the applications/embedded systems don't yet support.
>
> I'm sorry, but >90% of software does support Ogg.
2006 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] Stupid '-load-vn -licm' question (LLVM 1.6)
On Mar 17, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Eric Kidd wrote:
> Unfortunately, this generates really weird code on the LLVM 1.6
> PowerPC backend:
>
> LBB_matches_1: ; regex6
> lbz r4, 0(r3)
> LBB_matches_2: ; NodeBlock
> rlwinm r5, r4, 0, 24, 31
> cmplwi cr0, r5, 98
> blt cr0, LBB_matches_4 ; LeafBlock
> LBB_matches_3: ; LeafBlock1
>
2008 May 07
4
[LLVMdev] Missing passes
Hi,
I was evaluating all transformation passes and noticed a few things. In
particular, I found three passes in the documentation that I can't seem to
find any code for. Where these removed?
Lower GC intrinsics, for GCless code generators (-lowergc)
Correlated Expression Elimination (-cee)
Lower select instructions to branches (-lowerselect)
Additionally, I found the following passes for
2017 Nov 02
2
corrupted db after upgrading to 4.7
Hello
last week we updated three domain controllers (Sernet Samba) from 4.2 to
4.7, typical upgrade path (4.3->4.4->4.5->4.6->4.7), everything was ok.
The next day we got a mail from the Sernet team informing they fixed a
bug affecting the group memberships.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095
We've applied the update and few days after the update which should
2021 Sep 17
1
Repo for RHEL docs in CentOS Stream
Hey folks,
I'm following up after a meeting with Rich, Karsten, and others, where
we discussed next steps towards setting up a mirror of
https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/red-hat-enterprise-linux-documentation/rhel-8-docs
at
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/docs
Interesting question came up - how should the repo be named? Considering
that all "redhat", "centos
2007 Sep 17
2
removing a specific number of digist from a character string
Hello,
I would like to remove the last 8 digists of character strings in a
vector. Below I added a couple of elements from that vector.
I have a problem defining a pattern to replace the digits using for
example "sub". Removing the ".tif" part works fine using
sub('.tif',"",x), but how do I get rid of the four preceding digits?
Thanks for your help,
Kim
2007 Mar 12
4
R for copying and pasting selected image files?
Hello,
I would like to use R to process a list of text strings. The text
strings are filenames, encoding experimental settings. Based on the
information in there I'd like to select certain files and copy only
the selected files to another directory.
The files are images and there is no need, actually no desire, to
open them. Is there a way to use R for copying and pasting files with
any
2003 Dec 10
3
How much space is needed to install samba??
Dear samba support team,
I am very interested to use samba for "talking"
between Windows machine and Unix machine.
May I know how much space is needed to install samba on the server?
Thanks in advance for your great feedback.
Regards,
Alex
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
please
2005 Mar 10
2
[LLVMdev] Errors building llvm with Visual Studio in Debug mode
I'm not sure what causes this. Everything builds fine in Release mode
but when I try to do a Debug build I get an error in Transforms (which
causes all dependant projects to fail as well). I'm not exactly sure
what causes the error, I'll try to investigate tomorrow (unless
someone can figure out what it is by then). Below is the output from
VS:
------ Build started: Project:
2006 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] Question about uninstalling LLVM
Hello. Nice to meet you.
My name is Seung Jae Lee, a graduate student in UIUC CEE, who is working in NCSA for the present.
Nowadays I am trying to develop LLVM backend to spit out CHiMPS assembly code. In the process, I installed LLVM codes on my home directory in the host computer. But I don't think it was installed properly. While bootstrapping the LLVM C/C++ Front-End, I met several
2008 May 07
0
[LLVMdev] Missing passes
On 2008-05-07, at 08:42, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> I was evaluating all transformation passes and noticed a few things.
> In particular, I found three passes in the documentation that I
> can't seem to find any code for. Where these removed?
> Lower GC intrinsics, for GCless code generators (-lowergc)
Yes; this pass at least has been removed.
> Correlated Expression
2007 May 07
6
Dovecot not handling r/o mailboxes completely, and problem with ACL as a workaround
First of all, I think dovecot is really fantastic and I have thanks for all
the hard work. I think it will be the best fit for my ~5000 users when I
have it setup completely. We normally have approx 500 concurrent IMAP
connections during the day.
I am trying to convert from courier-imap to dovecot, but I have an issue with
public namespace folders that are not writable by certain users.
2007 Feb 28
0
IOError problem
Hello -
Can anyone explain why I get the stack trace in background_server.log when
I try to start my first worker? I don''t get this on subsequent workers,
only the first one.
I should note, the method I am using to start backgroundrb is documented
in the archives, and is likely the root of this problem. Suggestions about
how to "fix" or avoid this issue are appreciated.
2006 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 1.8 release notes draft
On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take
> a look and send me any comments or feedback you have:
> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>
Trivial changes:
* Most of LLVM is now built with "-pedantic", ensuring better
portability to more C++ Compilers.
Probably
2005 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] Errors building llvm with Visual Studio in Debug mode
It compiles successfully with VC++ 7.1. You are apparently using VC++
8.0, otherwise known as the Whidbey beta. The cause is no doubt due to
bugs in Whidbey and this isn't the first one encountered. I'm sorry,
but I cannot support beta Microsoft products (if only because I refuse
to have them anywhere near my computer). All I can suggest is that you
do a 'clean solution'