similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-ld -Xlinker trivial patch

Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote: > On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: >> Looks like this is platform dependent. > > Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. > > Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required > as of LLVM 2.7 to get RTTI for LLVM symbols? > No. If this is a hack to get the command 'g++ -shared -o libLLVM-2.7.so -lXXX -lXXX

Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > We currently use two different techniques to get whole libraries > included into the .so. On Linux (gnu ld and gold), we pass > --whole-archive, while on OSX we pass -all_load. Which ld does FreeBSD > use? If you can rearrange tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile until it works for > you and send us a patch, we can probably get it working for llvm-2.8. > ld on

On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: > Looks like this is platform dependent. Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required as of LLVM 2.7 to get RTTI for LLVM symbols? -- Pekka

On 12/4/13, 9:05 AM, Mark Felder said: ----------------- > There was no alternative; we couldn't keep BIND in base. BIND 9 will > certainly have a EoL before the EoL of FreeBSD 10.x, and we can't use > BIND 10 because it requires importing Python to base. I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that we should have a minimal Python in "base". More and more people

Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > I just tried it again on trunk (not 2.7) on OSX 10.5, and it works. > What platform are you on? Does it work with another version of gcc? > Looks like this is platform dependent. libLLVM-2.7.so created has size only 4145 bytes and all llvm symbols are missing. It's empty because there are no .o modules included into it, only libraries through -l options

Hello out there, my first try to install a package (e.g. ctest from CRAN) didn't succeed; looking at the error messages I think it must be a configuration problem of my machine, but as I'm not very experienced I would be glad if someone could give me a hint ... R's version is 0.63.0, my i386-Linux is kernel 2.0.35. I hadn't had problems to compile R, and R itself seems to work.

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote: >> >> On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: >>> >>> Looks like this is platform dependent. >> >> Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. >> >> Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required >> as of LLVM 2.7 to

Hello, I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes. It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the laptop. I guess there is a switch already prsent to have in the bootloader config? Thanks, oh -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Followed the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html The upgrade borked. Error message: Can't find 'kernel' When I checked with ls /boot/kernel/, the directory does exist. :-( Since the system has encrypted root partion with ZFSonROOT, I tried to follow instructions at https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=8958 to boot

Am 09.07.2016 um 17:19 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 09/07/16 10:27, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >> What is different afterwards when using with/without? Does it create a >> systemd service file? >> > Do not know about '--with-systemd', but there are no (horrible) systemd > components if you use '--without-systemd' there is nothing horrible in a systemd

Dear All , In sysinstall , there are menu items to install packages from release DVD . In bsdinstall , there is NO such package installation menu items . Another problem is there is no any available information about this subject in the Handbook installation pages ( at least I could not find any one one ) . Is there any such available information link , and is there any possibility to include

Hello, I have written a pass that works nicely if I use it with the opt tool, as proposed by the "Writing an LLVM Pass" tutorial. Now I want to execute this pass directly when clang is executed. I use the technique described here: http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~asampson/blog/clangpass.html. The pass is loaded and executed, when I run clang with the right command line. But clang

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 09.07.2016 um 17:19 schrieb Rowland penny: >> >> On 09/07/16 10:27, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>> >>> What is different afterwards when using with/without? Does it create a >>> systemd service file? >>> >> Do not know about

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >> >> We currently use two different techniques to get whole libraries >> included into the .so. On Linux (gnu ld and gold), we pass >> --whole-archive, while on OSX we pass -all_load. Which ld does FreeBSD >> use? If you can rearrange tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile until it

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >> >> I just tried it again on trunk (not 2.7) on OSX 10.5, and it works. >> What platform are you on? Does it work with another version of gcc? >> > > Looks like this is platform dependent. libLLVM-2.7.so created has size only > 4145 bytes and all llvm symbols are

Am 06.03.2017 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:48:32 +0100 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> well, there is nothing different when you use rpmbuild and chose the >> prefix you want besides that: >> >> * cleanup of orphan files >> * simpe upgarde/downgrade because you have your prebuild .rpm files

Hi all, It appears as though SVN r244198 introduced a regression. One that is affecting HEAD and stable/10 (for upcoming 10.0-R) and was introduced 10 months ago (but does not appear to have made it into 9.x yet or even stable/9). The regression introduced by r244198 is that: Whilst "sysctl -f /etc/sysctl.conf" will parse parameters with quoted values... "service sysctl

Could you give specific pointers to the resources that are relevant to segmentation fault debugging? This kind of bug is the hardest to bebug because the error message has nothing to do with the actual bug. Generic advices without consideration of specific properties of the problem will surely end up inefficient debugging. What I added to the .ll file in this case are just function calls to

Hello All ! I trying to build wine on my Redhat 7.1 box. Compilation stops with the following error messages : . . . make[1]: Leaving directory `/receive/wine-20010510/tsx11' make[1]: Entering directory `/receive/wine-20010510/dlls' make[2]: Entering directory `/receive/wine-20010510/dlls/ntdll' LD_LIBRARY_PATH="../../unicode:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"

Hi all! Sorry for my poor english, i'm italian. I installed Digium B410P on my asterisk server. I followed the official installation instructions found on digium site. These instruction, in my opinion, are not clear, so i tried with other ways (found on the trixbox site). I found this: http://www.trixbox.org/forums/trixbox-forums/trunks/howto-install-script-digium-b410p Now i can receive