similar to: [LLVMdev] newbie question (link error)

Oliver Schneider <gmane at assarbad.net> writes: >>> However, we have official git mirrors of most of the projects on >>> llvm.org, would using them instead of svnsync be an option for you? >> >> Well, if the authoritative source code control system for all the >> llvm projects is svn, I'd just as soon use svn as the tool at my end. > The git

I.e., I see this when I run `git fetch`: ``` $ git fetch -v llvm.org From http://llvm.org/git/llvm = [up to date] master -> llvm.org/master = [up to date] release_1 -> llvm.org/release_1 = [up to date] release_16 -> llvm.org/release_16 = [up to date] release_20 -> llvm.org/release_20 = [up to date] release_21 -> llvm.org/release_21 = [up to date]

> On 2016-Feb-05, at 15:22, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > That usually happens when someone deletes and then recreates an svn branch with the same name, as happened in r215001 and r215011. > It can be deleted now, if anyone wants to. ``` $ git push llvm.org :release_35 at 215010 fatal: unable to access 'http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git/': The requested

Hello, I am author of a Morse code training software written in Perl at http://starling.ws/morse Currently I output to *.wav and, if on Unix, convert to *.ogg. And that's okay for a trainer. But I have desire to upgrade the project to a real-time communication tool...or at least a Morse code audio mail routine. And I should like to avoid *.wav. I'd like some means of writing a pure

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:02 AM Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 8:38 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > As far as LLVM semantics are concerned, the implicit pointer doesn't > seem to be that much different from any other implicit values (such as > constants) to me. Why do you think that it

> On Jan 2, 2020, at 6:37 AM, Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > On the topic of intrinsics, right now we have two (dbg.value / > dbg.addr) that respectively describe: > * The "direct value" (quoting langref) of a variable, and > * The address of where the current variable value is stored. > Both of which map onto dwarf

Hi all, I am running a simulation and a curious error keeps coming up that stops the whole process. The error is a subscript out of bounds error, and it seems to happen at different points (floating around) throughout the looping simulation. Say, for example, it crashes on sample 1 - iteration 200. I can force it to start again on iteration 202 with all of the same settings, and it is

Hi, Is it possible to get an application that requires the MS NET framework to run under WINE? I see the MONO site. If I build and run MONO would it allow me to run an application under WINE? Actually I want to do this with a free program called RUFZ to help sharpen morse code skills. Thanks Kurt

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:20 AM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 10, 2020, at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:02 AM Jeremy Morse < > jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 8:38 PM

Does Samba 3.0.2a release integrate with Windows Active Directory running in 2003 Native Mode? The situation is that two corporate departments are joining their network infrastructure. One department runs several Samba 2.2 servers and the other is a 2003 Native Mode Active Directory. I understand that if you upgrade to Samba 3.0 this supports Windows 2000 AD, but it is unclear to me if

Hi, Let me consolidate what we discussed with my opinion. * On the point of new intrinsic llvm.dbg.derefval: It (new intrinsic) was more a neater way than a needed way. The whole functionality can go ahead without it and using llvm.dbg.value instead. Though I liked it (new intrinsic), since most of us are against it, it should be fine for me to drop it. This is because the transformation was

On 2011-08-29 04:21, Kurt Lidl wrote: > While I agree bootstrapping a new mirror from scratch is time and > resource consuming, this can be largely avoided by making a seed > of the svn tree available. (Basically, I think that looks like > a compressed tar file of the svn repository.) Or, a svnadmin dump > of the repo could be made available for the adventurous. Having the same

> On Nov 18, 2019, at 8:33 AM, Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi llvm-dev@, > > Switching focus to the LLVM implementation, the significant change is > using dbg.value's first operand to refer to a DILocalVariable, rather > than a Value. There's some impedance mismatch here, because all the > documentation (for example in the

Being one the many people trying to track down echo 'ghosts' I ran across this page: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-November/071301.html suggesting ways to adjust the gain. I have a TDM400P 2x2 config with Kewlstart lines configured. I've located a local telco milliwatt test line, and when I call it, the gain numbers are no where near 14844. Now, this

Hi folks, I am pushing a PoC patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D70833 for review which includes the case when temporary is promoted. For such cases it generates IR as call void @llvm.dbg.derefval(metadata i32 3, metadata !25, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_explicit_pointer, DW_OP_LLVM_arg0)), !dbg !32 And llvm-darfdump output looks like ------------- 0x0000007b:

Hi David, Thanks for your comments! I just want to add that I think it would neat if the entry values could map into multi-location dbg.values and DBG_VALUEs that are being proposed on this list. For example, if we have: int local = param1 + param2 + 123; I think it would be good if we would be able to to represent the four different permutations of the values of the parameters being

The debug info statistics bot is triggered by this job: http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/ which unfortunately hasn't been green in a very long time (>1mo). Alex/Azhar, do you know what's blocking that job? -- adrian > On Nov 20, 2019, at 9:46 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > +usual debug info folks (but I think in this case

Hello, I am having a lot of trouble with my deployment of Asterisk. I am running the PBX-In-a-flash turnkey of Asterisk and ever since deployment I have had many different problems. I have managed to get all issues sorted out as I go along, until this one that randomly began last week. We are using Grandstream GXP 2000 Handsets in the office, and at TE110P card to interface to our ISDN OnRamp10

Apologies for the slow response here Jeremy. Your reply has been incredibly helpful so far, I just need to try adding 'llvm.dbg.addr' myself to confirm that works. Thank you! - Brian Gesiak On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for working on coroutines, the debugging experience, and in > particular

During compiling I have not seen an error, however, when I start asterisk again it ends with: app_morsecode.so => (Morse code) == Registered custom function 'SYSINFO' func_sysinfo.so => (System information related functions) Segmentation fault (core dumped) How can I figure out what is wrong? bye Ronald