similar to: [LLVMdev] [Bug 1769] Should remove the -cee pass

Hi all, Pursuant to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1769 , I'm going to remove the CEE pass, which includes the Transforms/Scalar/ CorrelatedExprs.cpp file. If anyone has any objections to removing this pass and/or file, please speak now. Thanks! -bw

On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all, > > Pursuant to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1769 , I'm going to > remove the CEE pass, which includes the Transforms/Scalar/ > CorrelatedExprs.cpp file. If anyone has any objections to removing > this pass and/or file, please speak now. Go for it, thanks! -Chris

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > > The new package is here: > > http://edwintorok.googlepages.com/sqlite_lemon_llvmtest.tar.gz > > Anything else I should change? > > Looks good. Please commit. Should I speak with Chris about commit access? I made the change

On Mar 17, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Great. Note that -cee is a beta pass... it has some known bugs and > isn't planned to be worked on in the immediate future. :( After a bit of digging, I found one open bug and two failing test cases, all of which appear to be feature requests: #217: LLVM needs a generic dominator update mechanism nullpointer.ll: "a

On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Eric Kidd wrote: >> I'm particularly confused by the rlwinm instructions that keep turning up >> in PowerPC output, and the double test against 98. I don't have a problem >> or anything; I'm just trying to figure out what's going on. :-) > > Ah! The backend is running -lowerswitch, which does a binary search of the > case labels

On Mar 26, 2008, at 12:03 AM, Török Edvin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> > wrote: >> >> On Mar 25, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Török Edwin wrote: >>> The new package is here: >>> http://edwintorok.googlepages.com/sqlite_lemon_llvmtest.tar.gz >>> Anything else I should change? >> >> Looks good.

* Arc <arc@indymedia.org> shaped the electrons to say... > > I quite agree - it's frustrating to be able to use software that's > > almost there, then have all the development move to a format that 90% > > of the applications/embedded systems don't yet support. > > I'm sorry, but >90% of software does support Ogg.

On Mar 17, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Eric Kidd wrote: > Unfortunately, this generates really weird code on the LLVM 1.6 > PowerPC backend: > > LBB_matches_1: ; regex6 > lbz r4, 0(r3) > LBB_matches_2: ; NodeBlock > rlwinm r5, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmplwi cr0, r5, 98 > blt cr0, LBB_matches_4 ; LeafBlock > LBB_matches_3: ; LeafBlock1 >

Hi, I was evaluating all transformation passes and noticed a few things. In particular, I found three passes in the documentation that I can't seem to find any code for. Where these removed? Lower GC intrinsics, for GCless code generators (-lowergc) Correlated Expression Elimination (-cee) Lower select instructions to branches (-lowerselect) Additionally, I found the following passes for

Hello last week we updated three domain controllers (Sernet Samba) from 4.2 to 4.7, typical upgrade path (4.3->4.4->4.5->4.6->4.7), everything was ok. The next day we got a mail from the Sernet team informing they fixed a bug affecting the group memberships. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095 We've applied the update and few days after the update which should

Hey folks, I'm following up after a meeting with Rich, Karsten, and others, where we discussed next steps towards setting up a mirror of https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/red-hat-enterprise-linux-documentation/rhel-8-docs at https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/docs Interesting question came up - how should the repo be named? Considering that all "redhat", "centos

Hello, I would like to remove the last 8 digists of character strings in a vector. Below I added a couple of elements from that vector. I have a problem defining a pattern to replace the digits using for example "sub". Removing the ".tif" part works fine using sub('.tif',"",x), but how do I get rid of the four preceding digits? Thanks for your help, Kim

Hello, I would like to use R to process a list of text strings. The text strings are filenames, encoding experimental settings. Based on the information in there I'd like to select certain files and copy only the selected files to another directory. The files are images and there is no need, actually no desire, to open them. Is there a way to use R for copying and pasting files with any

Hello. Nice to meet you. My name is Seung Jae Lee, a graduate student in UIUC CEE, who is working in NCSA for the present. Nowadays I am trying to develop LLVM backend to spit out CHiMPS assembly code. In the process, I installed LLVM codes on my home directory in the host computer. But I don't think it was installed properly. While bootstrapping the LLVM C/C++ Front-End, I met several

On 2008-05-07, at 08:42, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > I was evaluating all transformation passes and noticed a few things. > In particular, I found three passes in the documentation that I > can't seem to find any code for. Where these removed? > Lower GC intrinsics, for GCless code generators (-lowergc) Yes; this pass at least has been removed. > Correlated Expression

First of all, I think dovecot is really fantastic and I have thanks for all the hard work. I think it will be the best fit for my ~5000 users when I have it setup completely. We normally have approx 500 concurrent IMAP connections during the day. I am trying to convert from courier-imap to dovecot, but I have an issue with public namespace folders that are not writable by certain users.

Hello - Can anyone explain why I get the stack trace in background_server.log when I try to start my first worker? I don''t get this on subsequent workers, only the first one. I should note, the method I am using to start backgroundrb is documented in the archives, and is likely the root of this problem. Suggestions about how to "fix" or avoid this issue are appreciated.

On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take > a look and send me any comments or feedback you have: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > Trivial changes: * Most of LLVM is now built with "-pedantic", ensuring better portability to more C++ Compilers. Probably

On 2009-09-06 19:57, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Edwin, > > thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. > Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored > in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the > graph in order to visit all nodes? (and what happens when you have > disjointed DFGs?). Sorry for the

Hi, I'm trying to create two gluster volumes over two nodes with two seperate networks: The names are in the hosts file of each node: root at gluster01 :~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 gluster01.peiker-cee.de gluster01 10.0.2.54 gluster02g1.peiker-cee.de gluster02g1 10.0.7.54 gluster02g2.peiker-cee.de gluster02g2 10.0.2.53