similar to: [LLVMdev] C interface

Hello Gordon, I'm part of the felix dev team, and I've been interested in making a backend for felix in llvm. It's very exciting to hear that you're making an ocaml interface to llvm. Do you have any of the libraries exposed to the public yet? Also, what license do you plan on using for the code? Felix is bsd, like llvm, so if there's any chance that you'll use a

On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm authoring a C interface to the LLVM IR type system. Since this > is Really Quite Tedious, I would like to solicit opinions before I > get too far down any paths that seem offensive. Sounds good. > I've attached the header, where I've mapped a portion of Module and > most of Type and

On 2007-10-02, at 10:46, Jan Rehders wrote: > where can I read more about this? I assume (hope) the lib provides > some kind of OCaml bindings? I could not find any trace of it in > the 2.1 release source so I guess it's currently SVN only? Jan, Here's a trivial example. $ cat metahelloworld.ml (* metahelloworld.ml *) open Llvm open Llvm_bitwriter let _ = let filename

Hi, where can I read more about this? I assume (hope) the lib provides some kind of OCaml bindings? I could not find any trace of it in the 2.1 release source so I guess it's currently SVN only? greetings, Jan On 2. Okt 2007, at 12:22, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-10-02, at 03:19, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> On Oct 2, 2007, at 00:17, Bill Wendling wrote: >>

On 2007-10-02, at 03:19, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Oct 2, 2007, at 00:17, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> I get this error duing a "make install": >> >> llvm[3]: Installing Debug /usr/local/lib/ocaml/libllvm.a >> install: /usr/local/lib/ocaml/libllvm.a: Permission denied >> make[3]: *** [install-a] Error 71 >> make[2]: *** [install] Error 1

Hi, this looks very promising. Do you have any plans to add bindings for the use of an ExecutionEngine, especially recompileAndRelinkFunction? I've build an interactive toplevel implemented in OCaml and I have to pull of some stunts to be able to change the definition of a function. (emit a .ll file containing the code, looking up the function and calling removeBody, then reading

On Sep 12, 2007, at 01:01, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > I'm authoring a C interface to the LLVM IR type system. Since this > is Really Quite Tedious, I would like to solicit opinions before I > get too far down any paths that seem offensive. I've attached the > header, where I've mapped a portion of Module and most of Type and > its subclasses. This is working, and

Produces machine-readable output delimited by special markers __MACHINEBEGIN__ __MACHINEEND__ --- common/mltools/tools_utils.ml | 8 ++++++++ common/mltools/tools_utils.mli | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/common/mltools/tools_utils.ml b/common/mltools/tools_utils.ml index 09f1bb544..f7abd5c3e 100644 --- a/common/mltools/tools_utils.ml +++

Mostly code motion, no behaviour changes. --- builder/Makefile.am | 3 +++ builder/languages.ml | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ builder/languages.mli | 21 ++++++++++++++++++ builder/list_entries.ml | 36 ++----------------------------- 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) create mode 100644 builder/languages.ml create mode 100644

Switch the internal storage for the notes of each entry to a sorted list with all the subkeys available (which should represent the translations to various languages). The current outputs are the same (i.e. still the untranslated notes), so this is just internal refactoring/preparation. --- builder/builder.ml | 4 ++-- builder/index_parser.ml | 19 +++++++++++++++----

I''m going through Peepcode''s Rspec Basics for an overview. He''s just doing a simple spec: class PeepCode end describe PeepCode do it "should be awsome" do end end So running spec spec/simple_spec.rb should produce according to his screen cast: 1 example, 0 failures, 1 not implemented but I only recieve: 1 example, 0 failures Also spec

I'm hacking on an llvm backend for the ocaml language. http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/ I'd like to solicit some advice regarding the constant data structures that ocaml's runtime requires. Rewriting its runtime is a non-goal. The biggest problem is a data structure called the frame table, a simple structure for which LLVM seems ill-prepared. For each call site in the program, ocaml

I''ve seen reference to an ''add'' method, as in Model.add. When and why would I want to use it? Is it related to Model.collection.build? Thanks, David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070916/b9e5c97a/attachment.html

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:00:27PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > Firstly I apologize if this is noise. I elected to not file a > bugzilla as the problem seems to be powerpc specific and with the limited > resources for Fedora developers it would seem unfair. > > I was recently trying to build a "current" libguestfs from the f16 > branch[1]. During the

This adds --print-target. In addition, v2 provides a machine-readable version (in JSON format). All of the record -> JSON boilerplate in this patch could be eliminated if we moved the baseline to OCaml 4.02. Rich.

Hi all, wxRuby 1.9.1 introduced great Rubish style accessors (x.label as a synonym for x.get_label). I just found that get_id has no corresponding Rubish style id accessor. For a CheckListBox or a StaticText (I haven''t checked for other kind of controls), id just returns the Ruby object_id. This is very confusing and not consistent with other accessors. Chauk-Mean.

The I_need_the_Kernel_Source wiki article should have instructions to do the procedure as non-root. Installing the source as root may not be as dangerous as compiling something, but nevertheless it is not recommended and is not consistent with the contents of other related articles. Akemi

Hi, It seems that my dovecot installation periodically stops authenticating users. Restarting dovecot resolves the issue temporarily. I'm authenticating via PAM to OpenLDAP on a CentOS 4 box. I've seen several related posts about this issue but no resolution. My logs show: Sep 15 03:58:24 server01 dovecot: imap-login: Can't connect to auth server at default: Resource

List, Whilst I'm in the mood for contributing stuff, here's another little howto I wrote on securing SSH that has proved popular in the past: http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=433216 If you feel it is suitable and you would like me to contribute it to the CentOS wiki, just set up a page in the appropriate area and I'll be happy to add it. Regards, Ned

I''ve been working on a Rails project with one other developer; he was using Test::Unit, and I was using RSpec. That works OK for a while, but obviously it starts causing pain when you have to check in two places to see if a piece of code is properly tested/spec''d, you can''t use TextMate shortcuts to switch back and forth between code and test, you have to duplicate