similar to: [LLVMdev] g++-4.2.1

On 7/24/07, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Anyone tried using g++ 4.2.1 to build llvm yet? 4.2 has at least one serious > bug that's a showstopper. > > -Dave > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu

For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? -Tomas

Hi all, I'm having some trouble with inline asm expressions, more specifically how to create the right FunctionType for a given constraint set. So far it has worked well for inputs, but not for outputs. The inline asm support in this language (which is D, LLVMDC[1]) is through asm *statements*. I never have inline asm *expressions*, and outputs are always via memory. I D my test looks like

On Apr 8, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > From my experience, the ARM backend fails miserably on all except the > most trivial uses of first class aggregates. For our project, this is > a complete blocker on ARM platforms. I'll try Dan's suggested fix for pr3795 "ARM assertion failure for load of first-class aggregate from variable GEP". I'm not

Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 > > Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? While we're at it, what about: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 This is a real nuisance, as people regularly build LLVM in a way (--enable-pic, which even is the default now) which

Hi everybody. I'm having (yet) another look at trying to get naked functions from D (1) working in our LLVM D Compiler - LDC (2). I have this test case: /// D CODE /// extern(C) int printf(char*, ...); ulong retval() { asm { naked; mov EAX, 0xff; mov EDX, 0xaa; ret; } } ulong retval2() { return (cast(ulong)0xaa << 32) | 0xff; } void main() {

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen <tomas.l.olsen at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm having some trouble with inline asm expressions, more specifically > how to create the right FunctionType for a given constraint set. > So far it has worked well for inputs, but not for outputs. The inline > asm support in this language (which is D, LLVMDC[1]) is

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen > <tomas.l.olsen at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having some trouble with inline asm expressions, more specifically >> how to create the right FunctionType for a given constraint set. >> So far it has

Hi. I had a strange issue today. basically llvm-as refused to do anything, borking out on the simplest of module: ; ModuleID = 'test' @_nothing_works_here = constant i32 42 $ llvm-as test.ll llvm-as: test.ll:1,0: test.ll:1: error: parse error, expecting `GLOBAL' or `CONSTANT' while reading token: '@_nothing_works_here' It turns out that I forgot to install bison before

2009/4/1 Robert Schuster <theBohemian at gmx.net>: > Hi, > the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I > learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of > LLVM is generally in its early stages of development. > > I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to > be unstable and the like. > >

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:09 PM, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Please do.  7z is not supported on Linux. Does not this work? http://packages.debian.org/lenny/p7zip-full Eugene

Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> writes: > On 7 July 2015 at 15:05, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >> I'm learning the cmake build. >> >> Is there a way to disable the build of a subdirectory in llvm/projects? >> I'm getting a build error on one project and don't want it to hold up >> the build of everything else. >

I think I have experienced this when more than one module contains definitions for the same values. ie. it should only be a declaration in one of them. On 8/15/07, Holger Schurig <hs4233 at mail.mn-solutions.de> wrote: > I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 > > When issueing the command > > $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ >

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > Actually git pull can sometimes get you into trouble. Probably git > fetch / git rebase is the better combination for LLVM. I don't get it. Doesn't "git pull --rebase" do exactly a fetch followed by a rebase? -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

Liam O'Toole wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 13:41:08 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > >> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any >> update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? >> >> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of >> Mate is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment.

Hello everyone, I have just released Syslinux 4.00-pre59. This is intended as last call for 4.00: from this point on I will only fix showstopper bugs. Anything that didn't make this release will have to wait for 4.01 or 4.10. Please help test it and report bugs, so we can avoid said showstopper bugs in the actual release. Target date for final release is Monday, June 28. -hpa

I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 When issueing the command $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ .obj/conf.o .obj/configwriter.o \ -L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib \ -lcrypto -lusb -lutil -lqt-mt -lXext -lX11 -lm -lpthread I get this output: Linking bitcode file '.obj/conf.o' Linked in file '.obj/conf.o' Linking

Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> Actually git pull can sometimes get you into trouble. Probably git >> fetch / git rebase is the better combination for LLVM. > > I don't get it. > > Doesn't "git pull --rebase" do exactly a fetch followed by a rebase? No. It does

Hi all. I'm working on a LLVM based compiler for the D programming language by Walter Bright. D allows static arrays up to 16MB in size. I'm initializing global static arrays with a constant initializer. But D requires that (per default) static arrays are initialized with the default initializer for the element type. For float this happens to be NaN, so I cannot use a

Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> writes: > In short, I propose a intrinsic based approach which hinges on the > concept of a "parallel map". The immediate effect of using intrinsics > is that we no longer have to worry about missing metadata. Moreover, > we are still free to lower the intrinsics in a variety of ways -- > including vectorizing them or