similar to: [LLVMdev] bcanalyzer emits errors

Chad, Yes it helps, thanks. I have started hacking bitcode-analyzer. ---ajonwa ----- Original Message ----- From: Chad Rosier Sent: 11/05/11 09:07 PM To: ajonwa ajonwa Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Enable Detailed Output llvm-bcanalyzer ajonwa, It will provide some of the information you're seeking, but not all. Here's a partial dump from one of the bitcode test cases:

Hi, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: > Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/Format.h"? Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. Btw, llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp seems to also use fprintf -- does mixing it with errs() cause problems and should it be converted to use format()? best regards, Timo Lindfors

Hello, llvm-bcanalyzer told me that the size of the BLOCKINFO_BLOCK of my file is "1.345017e+01" percent of the whole file. This is not very readable. The attached patch prints the percentage without scientific notation so we get something bit more readable: Block ID #0 (BLOCKINFO_BLOCK): Num Instances: 1 Total Size: 637b/79.62B/19W % of file: 13.450169 Num

conversion of llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp compiles, but not runtime tested Cheers, Gabor -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp.diff URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070704/b12afa40/attachment.ksh>

Dear All, Does llvm-bcanalyzer still print the number of instructions in a bitcode file, or has that functionality been removed? -- John T.

On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:08 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Does llvm-bcanalyzer still print the number of instructions in a > bitcode > file, or has that functionality been removed? Try the "opt -instcount -stats" option, -Chris

Hello all, Does anyone know how to make llvm-bcanalyzer produce detailed output i.e. provides additional information on a per-function basis. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111105/8e7fe152/attachment.html>

I think I have experienced this when more than one module contains definitions for the same values. ie. it should only be a declaration in one of them. On 8/15/07, Holger Schurig <hs4233 at mail.mn-solutions.de> wrote: > I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 > > When issueing the command > > $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ >

On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Hi, > > Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: >> Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/ >> Format.h"? > > Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. It looks like something similar got applied back in r82772 on 9/25. > > Btw,

fucking hell, listserv... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Wilfred L. Guerin" <wilfredguerin at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:54:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Segment Register Use To: Holger Schurig <hs4233 at mail.mn-solutions.de> I was very much expecting this style of response ;) I believe the following characteristics and class of example should

I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 When issueing the command $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ .obj/conf.o .obj/configwriter.o \ -L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib \ -lcrypto -lusb -lutil -lqt-mt -lXext -lX11 -lm -lpthread I get this output: Linking bitcode file '.obj/conf.o' Linked in file '.obj/conf.o' Linking

Tomas, Please file a bug for this. Attach the .o files and command line in question. Thanks, Reid. On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 23:22 +0200, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > I think I have experienced this when more than one module contains > definitions for the same values. ie. it should only be a declaration > in one of them. > > On 8/15/07, Holger Schurig <hs4233 at

I realize I am one of the few who uses the segment registers (especially CS and DS) on the ia32 chips for example, and a definite few with complete segregation models that rival specialized physical processors... GCC still fails to use these correctly and if your LLVM still depends on either Generic or some of the RTL models they use in various processor definitions, I express concern for

Hello All, Sorry to rehash a question I am sure has shown several time but I cannot google up the answer from the lists. Does anyone know where I can get some royalty free, cost free music for my music on hold? I saw someone's post several weeks ago that said that this exists at a download site but I have not been able to find it. Thanks! Wiley Siler -------------- next

This implements -dry-run for llvmc2: $ llvmc2 -dry-run main.c llvm-g++ -c -x c main.c -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.bc -emit-llvm llc -f /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.bc -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.s llvm-gcc -c -x assembler /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.s -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.o llvm-gcc /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.o -o a.out $ llvmc2 -dry-run -opt main.c llvm-g++ -c -x c main.c -o /tmp/llvm_UGZtwL/main.bc -emit-llvm opt

Good evening, guys! I suppose mingw build would be stable, though, I would like some patches to be picked up. * RC1 LLVM and clang can be built on either msys/autoconf, msys/cmake and mingw/cmake. By CMake, all tests can run but 37 of LLVM and 5 of clang tests would fail. On mingw by configure tests cannot be executed. [PR9505] For compiling, I saw a warning, in llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp. (fixed in

> If you use bison instead of yacc this bug is not exposed. > > Is this correct behavior? I guess so. bison is quite different to yacc, see "info bison". llvm depends on bison and this is quite well documented. At http://llvm.org/releases/2.3/docs/GettingStarted.html#software it says "bison" and specifically which version of Bison you've to use.

> The idea is to use llvm to put performance sensitive code into > a DLL that a Windows app can then use. > > This would build the performance sensitive code on the target > machine making it possible to exploit CPU specific x86 > vector instructions. Isn't this what Apple does with OpenGL, except that they skip the DLL step?

I yesterday brought up to date the version of * the CVS and now I have a problem. I cannot effect the RELOAD that * it breaks. Somebody can help or say as to load new users without stopping * ? Thank?s Excuse my English Joao Carlos Moura

Are JIT DLLs supported? The idea is to use llvm to put performance sensitive code into a DLL that a Windows app can then use. This would build the performance sensitive code on the target machine making it possible to exploit CPU specific x86 vector instructions. The code that calls fn's in the DLL should, ideally, be unaware that a llvm JIT is being used. -- Øyvind Harboe