Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [PATCH] trivial: remove unused variable"
2009 Apr 28
1
[PATCH] ocfs2/trivial: Remove unused variable in ocfs2_rename.
With indexed dir enabled, now we use ocfs2_dir_lookup_result to
wrap all the bh used for dir. So remove the 2 unused variables.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 4 ----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
index 2220f93..33464c6 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
@@
2007 Jul 12
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] trivial: remove unused variable
fix the following warning:
FastDSE.cpp: In member function ‘bool<unnamed>::FDSE::handleEndBlock(llvm::BasicBlock&, llvm::SetVector<llvm::Instruction*, std::vector<llvm::Instruction*, std::allocator<llvm::Instruction*> >, llvm::SmallSet<llvm::Instruction*, 16u> >&)’:
FastDSE.cpp:174: warning: unused variable ‘AA’
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/FastDSE.cpp
2010 Sep 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 75, Issue 32
2010/9/15 <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to
> llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu
>
> You can
2012 Jul 13
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
Benjamin Kramer wrote:
> On 13.07.2012, at 09:46, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am in charge of the controlled introduction of clang into
>> our builds at my workplace. Since all our tools must run from
>> a ClearCase view for automatic dependency tracking, we have been
>> biten by a Linux bug, and
2020 Jan 28
3
Where does LTO remove unused functions?
Hi!
LLVM newbie here, I was mainly working on the frontend so far. We had a
small hackathon project idea to piggyback on LTO to detect dead code
(unused functions). The basic idea is to compile the code for every target
and dump the removed functions. Intersect the function symbol names for
each target and those functions should be safe to remove from the source
code (unless there were some
2020 Jan 28
2
Where does LTO remove unused functions?
Thanks!
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:05 PM Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote:
> By default even regular LTO now has module summaries (like the kind used
> for ThinLTO). LTO will then run index based dead symbol analysis here:
> http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/LTO/LTO.cpp#923. Then when linkRegularLTO is
> called here: http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/LTO/LTO.cpp#935, it
2012 Jul 13
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
On 13.07.2012, at 09:46, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am in charge of the controlled introduction of clang into
> our builds at my workplace. Since all our tools must run from
> a ClearCase view for automatic dependency tracking, we have been
> biten by a Linux bug, and readlink("/proc/self/exe", ...) gives
>
2010 Jul 05
1
[LLVMdev] [HEADSUP] Another attempt at CallInst operand rotation
Reminder...
Round one has been committed as
<http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=107432>
I hope that it got digested by now, as I plan to commit the second
round tomorrow.
In fact I made two test commits already:
r107480 and r107580, the former of which
actually uncovered some more uses of the
low-level interfaces in core LLVM that
have slipped through.
To be
2012 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com
> <mailto:benny.kra at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 13.07.2012, at 21:39, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com
> <mailto:gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:
>
> > Benjamin Kramer wrote:
> >> On 13.07.2012,
2012 Jul 13
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
On 13.07.2012, at 21:39, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Benjamin Kramer wrote:
>> On 13.07.2012, at 09:46, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am in charge of the controlled introduction of clang into
>>> our builds at my workplace. Since all our tools must run
2011 Nov 30
1
[PATCH] [MEMALLOC] remove unused variable
Since commit 6ee30a14afac681adb1d62361ebcb0c9b6ba3153 ([klibc]
[MEMALLOC] Add pushstackmark), the 'oldstackp' local variable has been
unused. This change deletes the unused variable.
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen at google.com>
---
usr/dash/memalloc.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/usr/dash/memalloc.c b/usr/dash/memalloc.c
index
2010 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] [HEADSUP] Another attempt at CallInst operand rotation
Sounds great to me Gabor. I really like your new incremental approach to this patch set.
-Chris
On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gabor Greif wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch.
> I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to
> respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks
>
2024 Jul 29
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: remove unused variable ret
Fix build with CONFIG_NOUVEAU_PLATFORM_DRIVER enabled:
../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c: In function ?nouveau_platform_probe?:
../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c:29:13: error: unused variable ?ret? [-Werror=unused-variable]
29 | int ret;
| ^~~
Fixes: 961ae5f9807b ("drm/nouveau: handle pci/tegra drm_dev_{alloc, register} from common
2016 Nov 11
2
[PATCH] vhost/vsock: Remove unused but set variable
Remove the unused but set variable vq in vhost_transport_send_pkt() to
fix the following GCC warning when building with 'W=1':
drivers/vhost/vsock.c:198:26: warning: variable ?vq? set but not used
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser at distanz.ch>
---
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
2016 Nov 11
2
[PATCH] vhost/vsock: Remove unused but set variable
Remove the unused but set variable vq in vhost_transport_send_pkt() to
fix the following GCC warning when building with 'W=1':
drivers/vhost/vsock.c:198:26: warning: variable ?vq? set but not used
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser at distanz.ch>
---
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
2013 Mar 11
1
[PATCH -next] vhost-blk: remove unused variable
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei at trendmicro.com.cn>
The variable vq is initialized but never used
otherwise, so remove the unused variable.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei at trendmicro.com.cn>
---
drivers/vhost/blk.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
index 658c5f9..d9b245b 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/blk.c
+++
2013 Mar 11
1
[PATCH -next] vhost-blk: remove unused variable
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei at trendmicro.com.cn>
The variable vq is initialized but never used
otherwise, so remove the unused variable.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei at trendmicro.com.cn>
---
drivers/vhost/blk.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
index 658c5f9..d9b245b 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/blk.c
+++
2002 Jul 15
1
Patch: remove unused tty variable from session.c
Hi.
This was added just before 3.4p1 for passing to aix_usrinfo and is now
unused.
-Daz.
Index: session.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/openssh/session.c,v
retrieving revision 1.210
diff -u -r1.210 session.c
--- session.c 4 Jul 2002 03:08:41 -0000 1.210
+++ session.c 15 Jul 2002 11:50:14 -0000
@@ -1159,8 +1159,6 @@
void
2016 Feb 24
0
[PATCH 2/5] ntfs: remove unused variable and have ntfssect use char API calls
On 2/24/2016 08:02, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote:
> The variable 'ok' is never used and generates a warning. Remove it. Also
> ntfssect.c is designed to be compiled in non Unicode mode when using
> MSVC compilers, so remove all ambiguity about it (LPCTSTR -> LPCSTR, use
> of 'A' API calls) so that it doesn't break when compiled in Unicode
> mode, which is
2016 Feb 25
0
[PATCH 2/5] ntfs: remove unused variable and have ntfssect use char API calls
On 2/25/2016 07:30, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote:
> Hi Shao,
>
> On 2016.02.24 23:43, Shao Miller via Syslinux wrote:
>> Did you happen to notice anything unusual when compiling with MinGW
>> under Linux, once 'ok' was removed? I seem to recall warnings about
>> unused results, but not of unused objects. Maybe that's an incorrect
>> recollection or