similar to: [LLVMdev] Strategy to compile for LLVM IR (Chris Lattner)

Hi, We have a compiler for the Faust language (faust.grame.fr) that currently compiles a C++ class which implements a DSP plug-in with several methods. Our strategy to compile LLVM IR instead is the following: - use the current Faust ==> C++ compiler to compile a "empty" plug-in that we use as a template C++ class. - compile this template C++ class using "llvm-g++

> > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:16:32 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Partial evaluation and LLVM (2) > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0706151213090.7416 at nondot.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-unknown" > > On

> For the JIT and a couple of optimizers on x86 (suitably stripped etc), > we see it taking ~2M uncompressed. Additionally, as you say, this is > very compressible for an install image. 2mByte for PC apps is "nothing" these days. The app I have in mind is 50-200mByte depending on install options. To be able to write llvm DLLs and ship intermediate code would definitely be

My congratulations to Chris as well! For those who don't follow the ACM world much, SIGPLAN is the primary research organization for PL and Compilers, and I expect this award to become one of the most prestigious awards in the field. It's quite a coup for Chris and for LLVM to have won it, and moreover to win it in the first year of the award. And it's remarkable that it has

Hello, I am using the Faust language which leverages LLVM's MCJIT for code generation (http://faust.grame.fr/). There are some problems[1] when generating code and executing it afterwards on Windows with a MSVC "host" (that is, LLVM itself and the software it is used in are built with MSVC). It works fine when building LLVM / Faust with Mingw. On MSVC the code is generated with

Nikolaos Kavvadias wrote: > Dear friends, > > I have been using the SUIF Machine infrastructure for sometime. Some > optimizations are available without using a target machine, i.e. at the > SUIFvm level. At this level you have "infinite" registers. Other > optimizations, including analyses as for profiling require the use of a > target library, a complete

First-Time SIGPLAN Award to Apple's Chris Lattner for Developing Popular LLVM Infrastructure with Applications in Commercial, Research, Teaching, and Open Source Projects From the press release: June 7, 2010 – The ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN) today presents its first-ever Programming Languages Software Award to Chris Lattner of Apple Inc. for his design

Dear friends, I have been using the SUIF Machine infrastructure for sometime. Some optimizations are available without using a target machine, i.e. at the SUIFvm level. At this level you have "infinite" registers. Other optimizations, including analyses as for profiling require the use of a target library, a complete backend. It is very sad, that they have discontinued their MIPS

Hi, Thanks so much at first. > Here are some observations: > > > for C level, > > > > char a[]="global string test"; > > for(i=0;i<strlen(a);i++){ > > a[i]= a[i]^RANDMON; > > } > > If you compile this C code, "global string test" will occur in the program > binary, so you have not obfuscated anything. You can

Hi all, As per the instructions here <http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access>, I contacted Chris Lattner to obtain commit access but haven't received a response (either positive or negative). What's the expected turnaround time for this (I contacted him five days ago)? In case he's currently unavailable, is there someone else I could contact? Thanks,

Hi, and thanks for the feedback. >My own gut feeling on this is that you'd be better off figuring out >how to do this in the context of Faust, which already does a important >subset of what you are describing, though notably without (I think) >the LLVM part. Surely a contribution to the discussion by the Faust people would be welcome; and even more than to the discussion :->.

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at grame.fr> wrote: > > Le 29 mai 2010 à 01:08, Bill Wendling a écrit : > >> Hi Stéphane, >> >> The SSE support is the LLVM backend is fine. What is the code that's generated? Do you have some short examples of where LLVM doesn't do as well as the equivalent scalar code? >> >> -bw >>

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at grame.fr> wrote: >> >> Le 29 mai 2010 à 01:08, Bill Wendling a écrit : >> >>> Hi Stéphane, >>> >>> The SSE support is the LLVM backend is fine. What is the code that's generated? Do you have some

Le 29 mai 2010 à 01:08, Bill Wendling a écrit : > Hi Stéphane, > > The SSE support is the LLVM backend is fine. What is the code that's generated? Do you have some short examples of where LLVM doesn't do as well as the equivalent scalar code? > > -bw > > On May 28, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Stéphane Letz wrote: We are actually testing LLVM for the Faust language

Hey Guys, I'm working on a project in Android related to System-level Audio DSP Effects for Tuning Android Audio. I want to leverage Faust ( https://faust.grame.fr/) to allow users to program their own filters. Faust provides a libfaust implementation which includes a JIT Compiler which leverages LLVM and seems to be the best path for me to use. Unfortunately I'm having problems

Hi, We have a web page on our "LLVM backend for Faust" project available here: http://www.grame.fr/~letz/faust_llvm.html. Best Regards Stephane Letz

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote: > I have been looking for a while to  LLVM as a possible technology to build a > DSP execution engine, providing the runtime flexibility needed by real-time > interactive DSP applications (like patcher languages), or by plug-in based > processors, and in the same moment > the powerful link time

> > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:25:30 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Strategy to compile for LLVM IR > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0706151224570.7416 at nondot.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-unknown" > > On

Hello, i have installed samba alpha3, domain-join works fine. But smbpython setup/adduser is buggy, so i tried to install newest checkout. (I also tried it with a new installed machine) After configure, make, and make install there is no smbpython in source/bin. Everyother seems to bee there. It is a ubuntu with the packets installed mentioned in the tutorial plus python and python-dev and

On 03.12.2013 14:30, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Can you send a patch? Hi Rafael, the patch is attached. @Mikael, Tim Thanks for the help. I really needed only the link to the repo. Regards, Kai > > On 2 December 2013 06:44, Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC >> compiler. All