similar to: [LLVMdev] adding a target for "-march=" option in Visual Studio (Resolved)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] adding a target for "-march=" option in Visual Studio (Resolved)"

2007 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] adding a target for "-march=" option in Visual Studio (Resolved)
No, No... That's OK. I appreciate your concerns. Seung Jae Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:30:59 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] adding a target for "-march=" option in Visual Studio (Resolved) >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Seung Jae Lee wrote:
2008 Feb 22
1
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Xi, I just installed VS2005 pro w/ SP1 for Win Vista. Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:36:43 +0800 >From: "Xi Wang" <xi.wang at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >I'm sorry but did you
2007 Apr 06
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM command options in Visual Studio
Thank you for your kind explanation. I did it as you mentioned. That is, I set '-march=x86 hello.bc' in the Command Arguments. (I also set my compiled LLC, i.e., LLVM_ROOT_DIR\win32\debug\llc.exe, in the property name Command.) But, when I made a breakpoint in main( ) of llc.cpp and then started to debug I found the 'InputFilename'(llc.cpp:176) is shown like {???}. Therefore it
2007 Mar 28
0
[LLVMdev] "deserialize primitive type 16 (vers=0, pos=15)" with Visual Studio
Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I followed the steps in "Getting Started with the LLVM System using Microsoft Visual Studio" in the document in LLVM page. > > I made hello.c file exactly same shown in the page. > I made hello.bc on UNIX and transferred it to my Windows computer. > And I typed "llc -march=c hello.bc" > (Of course, I downloaded the latest version of LLVM
2007 Mar 28
3
[LLVMdev] "deserialize primitive type 16 (vers=0, pos=15)" with Visual Studio
I followed the steps in "Getting Started with the LLVM System using Microsoft Visual Studio" in the document in LLVM page. I made hello.c file exactly same shown in the page. I made hello.bc on UNIX and transferred it to my Windows computer. And I typed "llc -march=c hello.bc" (Of course, I downloaded the latest version of LLVM and compiled with VS before this.) But my command
2008 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Thanks--I was offline when I wrote it, couldn't Google. Found it in about 5 seconds once I was back online. Second question: I'm getting various build errors relating (it seems) to configuration: can't find windows.h and so forth. Where (or to whom) is the best place to report these and iterate until we fix them? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking,
2006 Nov 09
3
[LLVMdev] Is this bug in LLVM?
Hello. My name is Seung Jae Lee. I'd like to ask you onething about converting to ARM assembly code. I saved the simplest C code shown in your LLVM webpage as 'hello.c' And I made 'hello.bc' by "$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello". In order to make ARM assembly code, I typed "llc -march=arm hello.bc -o hello.arm" But, I met this error. llc: ARMISelDAGToDAG.cpp:73:
2007 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. Thank you Seung Jae Lee
2007 Apr 06
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM command options in Visual Studio
Hello. I wonder how I can use the options of LLVM commands in Visual Studio Debugging mode. For example, If I want to follow the pass on 'llc -march=x86 hello.bc' in the Visual Studio's debuggin mode, how can I let it know the options such as '-march=x86 hello.bc'? I can set the breakpoint in main() in llc.cpp but I can't let it cognize that I want X86 assembly code from
2008 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I believe Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so you may not need that. I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the getgnuwin32 folks. I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably already have everything. You will need to have the executables in your path. I build with VisualStudio 2k5
2008 Feb 13
2
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I simply found it at: http://getgnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:11:04 -0800 >From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "'LLVM Developers Mailing List'" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >I'm sorry,
2008 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Hola Seung, I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked. I updated the 2.2 win32 vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be building. You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed. I used the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine. Good luck. Chuck. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed: $ flex --version flex version 2.5.4 $ bison --version bison (GNU Bison) 2.3 Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman. Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Should that work,
2008 Feb 13
1
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
If you are using the Express versions of Visual Studio, the Platform SDK(windows.h) is a seperate install that you have to download. Kevin Tew Ted Neward wrote: > Thanks--I was offline when I wrote it, couldn't Google. Found it in about 5 > seconds once I was back online. > > Second question: I'm getting various build errors relating (it seems) to > configuration:
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Thanks for your comment. I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on VS2005. (I didn't modify anything before the compilation) I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM doc says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to have bison and/or flex installed where
2008 Feb 14
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
>I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed: WinGNU32 Flex and Bison are the ones to use with LLVM and Visual Studio. http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ The LLVM Visual Studio .sln file is for Visual Studio 2003 so will require conversion and some minor modification. Aaron > Should that work, assuming they're on the PATH? When I ran the build from > inside VS, I get some
2007 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] adding a target for "-march=" option in Visual Studio
Hello. How can I add one more TARGET in "llc -march=TARGET" when using Visual Studio in addition to CBackend and x86? Thank you. Seung Jae Lee
2006 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] Registering '-march=' option for LLC
Thank you for replying to me. As you recommended, I modified configure.ac in autoconf folder. But I’m not sure about how to regenerate configure. Sorry… I tried to follow the way introduced in README.TXT in the autoconf folder. It asks me to run autoupdate on all the m4 and configure.ac. And then it asks me to regenerate configure script with AutoRegen.sh. However, when I did that, I got an error
2008 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
By the way, somebody (I think it was Chuck, but I don't remember for certain) was asking for the BuildLog.htm from building the llvm.sln file under VS 2005 SP1 for diagnostic purposes; right now the SLN is configured to produce a new BuildLog for each and every one of the projects inside the solution. I don't know who's responsible for this guy, but that's probably not the best way
2008 Feb 21
1
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I use VS2005/Vista, which works well... Thx, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:02:29 +0800 >From: "Xi Wang" <xi.wang at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Hi there, > >Did anyone try